Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM66426
Volume:
10 |
7 |
Jul 2026
Pages:
1-4
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Department of civil engineering
GOLDEN valley integrated campus
Department of civil engineering
GOLDEN valley integrated campus
Rapid urbanisation has increased the consumption of natural aggregates in concrete, leading to environmental degradation and depletion of natural resources. Simultaneously, the generation of electronic waste (E-waste), particularly plastic components, has emerged as a major environmental challenge due to its non-biodegradable nature. This study investigates the feasibility of utilising shredded E-waste plastic as a partial replacement for natural coarse aggregates in M30 grade concrete. Concrete mixes were prepared with 0%, 5%, 10%, and 15% replacement of coarse aggregates by E-waste plastic. The workability of fresh concrete was evaluated using the slump test, while mechanical properties were assessed through compressive strength, split tensile strength, and flexural strength tests at curing ages of 7, 14, 28, 56, and 90 days. The results indicate a gradual reduction in workability and strength with increasing E-waste content. However, concrete containing 5% E-waste plastic exhibited mechanical performance comparable to conventional concrete, with marginal strength reduction and improved sustainability benefits. The study concludes that limited replacement of coarse aggregate with E-waste plastic is feasible for producing eco-friendly concrete suitable for selected structural and non-structural applications.
KEYWORDS
Based on the experimental investigation, the following conclusions are drawn: 1. Incorporation of E-waste plastic reduces workability and mechanical strength with increasing replacement levels. 2. Concrete containing 5% E-waste plastic exhibited mechanical properties close to conventional M30 concrete. 3. Higher replacement levels (10% and 15%) caused significant reductions in strength due to weak bonding and reduced density. 4. An optimum replacement level of 5% E-waste plastic is recommended for achieving a balance between strength performance and sustainability. 5. The use of E-waste plastic in concrete contributes to waste reduction, conservation of natural aggregates, and environmentally responsible construction practices.
[1] Bureau of Indian Standards, IS 10262:2019 – Concrete Mix Proportioning – Guidelines, New Delhi, India, 2019. [2] Bureau of Indian Standards, IS 456:2000 – Plain and Reinforced Concrete – Code of Practice, New Delhi, India, 2000. [3] Bureau of Indian Standards, IS 516:2018 – Methods of Tests for Strength of Concrete, New Delhi, India, 2018. [4] Bureau of Indian Standards, IS 5816:1999 – Splitting Tensile Strength of Concrete, New Delhi, India, 1999. [5] Bureau of Indian Standards, IS 1199:1959 – Methods of Sampling and Analysis of Concrete, New Delhi, India, 1959. [6] Bureau of Indian Standards, IS 383:2016 – Specification for Coarse and Fine Aggregates from Natural Sources for Concrete, New Delhi, India, 2016. [7] A. M. Neville, Properties of Concrete, 5th ed., Pearson Education, 2011. [8] P. K. Mehta and P. J. M. Monteiro, Concrete: Microstructure, Properties and Materials, 4th ed., McGraw-Hill, 2014. [9] S. Mindess, J. F. Young, and D. Darwin, Concrete, 2nd ed., Prentice Hall, 2003. [10] R. Kumar and S. Baskar, “Utilization of electronic waste in concrete,” Int. J. Earth Sciences and Engineering, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 918–925, 2011.
Publication Date
7/31/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
12
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...