Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM66950

EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION ON MECHANICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF CONCRETE USING MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE ASH AND EGG SHELL POWDER AS PARTIAL CEMENT REPLACEMENT

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM66950

Volume:

10 |

8 |

Aug 2026

Pages:

1-12

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM66950

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

BS

BOORLA SATHISH

Department of Civil Engineering (Structural Engineering)

Malla Reddy Engineering College (Autonomous), Maisammaguda, Secunderabad, Telangana, India 500100

Download Author Certificate
DBSR

Dr. B. Sudharshan Reddy

Professor & Head, Department of Civil Engineering (Structural Engineering)

Malla Reddy Engineering College (Autonomous), Maisammaguda, Secunderabad, Telangana, India 500100

Download Co-Author Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

The production of ordinary Portland cement (OPC) is among the most energy- and carbon-intensive industrial activities, and the search for supplementary materials capable of partially displacing cement in concrete has become a central theme of sustainable construction research. The present investigation examines the combined use of two waste-derived powders as partial replacement of cement in M20 grade concrete: municipal solid waste ash (MSWA), obtained by incineration of municipal refuse, and egg shell powder (ESP), a calcium-carbonate-rich biowaste generated in large quantities by hatcheries, bakeries and the food industry. The two materials are chemically complementary: ESP supplies finely divided calcium carbonate that acts as a filler and nucleation agent, while MSWA contributes siliceous and aluminous constituents with potential pozzolanic activity. An experimental programme comprising six concrete mixes was executed. The control mix contained no replacement material, while in the remaining five mixes the ESP content was held constant at 5% by mass of cement and the MSWA content was varied from 0% to 20% in increments of 5%. The mixes were proportioned by the method of IS 10262:2019, and the fresh and hardened behaviour was characterised through slump tests, cube compressive strength tests at 7, 14 and 28 days, and beam flexural strength tests at 28 days. Workability improved progressively as MSWA content increased, while hardened density remained essentially constant across the replacement series. Compressive strength rose with MSWA content up to 15%, the mix containing 5% ESP with 15% MSWA recording the highest 28-day strength of approximately 26 N/mm² — about 28.7% above the control — and 28-day flexural strength increased from 2.10 N/mm² for the control to a maximum of 2.74 N/mm² at the same combination, an improvement of 30.5%, before declining at 20% MSWA. A combined replacement of 5% ESP with 15% MSWA, corresponding to a total cement displacement of 20%, is accordingly identified as the optimum.

KEYWORDS

Municipal solid waste ash egg shell powder partial cement replacement workability compressive strength flexural strength sustainable concrete.

Cite This Article

BOORLA SATHISH, Dr. B. Sudharshan Reddy, "EXPERIMENTAL INVESTIGATION ON MECHANICAL CHARACTERISTICS OF CONCRETE USING MUNICIPAL SOLID WASTE ASH AND EGG SHELL POWDER AS PARTIAL CEMENT REPLACEMENT," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 1-12, Aug 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM66950

Full Article/Conclusion

An experimental investigation into the combined use of egg shell powder (ESP) and municipal solid waste ash (MSWA) as partial cement replacement in M20 grade concrete leads to the following conclusions. •  Workability improves progressively as MSWA content increases from 0% to 20% at a fixed 5% ESP dose, with all mixes remaining within the medium-workability range and no segregation or bleeding observed. •  Hardened density remains essentially unaffected by the replacement, varying by less than 1% about the control across the entire series. •  Compressive strength increases with MSWA content up to 15%, the combination of 5% ESP with 15% MSWA giving the highest 28-day strength of approximately 26 N/mm² — 28.7% above the control — before declining at 20% MSWA. •  Flexural strength follows the same trend, rising from 2.10 N/mm² (control) to a maximum of 2.74 N/mm² (30.5% improvement) at the same optimum combination. •  A combined replacement of 5% ESP with 15% MSWA — 20% total cement displacement — is identified as the optimum for M20 grade concrete, suitable for plain and lightly reinforced applications in non-aggressive exposure, subject to further durability qualification. •  At the optimum mix, roughly 83 kg/m³ of cement is displaced, avoiding an indicative 75–80 kg CO₂ per cubic metre and diverting an equal mass of waste from landfill, giving concrete practical effect to circular-economy policy for two locally abundant waste streams. •  Future work should extend the investigation to durability testing, microstructural characterisation, and structural-element behaviour at the optimum replacement level.

References

1. Yerramala, A. (2014), "Properties of Concrete with Eggshell Powder as Cement Replacement", The Indian Concrete Journal, pp. 94–102. 2. Gowsika, D., et al. (2014), "Experimental Investigation of Egg Shell Powder as Partial Replacement with Cement in Concrete", IJETT, Vol. 14, No. 2. 3. Parthasarathi, N. (2017), "Experimental Study on Partial Replacement of Cement with Egg Shell Powder and Silica Fume", Rasayan J. Chem., Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 442–449. 4. Mythili, B., et al. (2017), Egg shell powder replacement in cement mortar — strength studies. 5. Praveen Kumar, R., "Experimental Study on Partial Replacement of Cement with Egg Shell Powder", IJIET, Vol. 5. 6. Divya, et al. (2017), ESP preparation protocol and replacement in 1:1.5:3 concrete. 7. Monisha, et al. (2017), 20% ESP with polypropylene fibre in M20 concrete. 8. Al-Rawas, A. A., Hago, A. W., Taha, R., and Al-Kharousi, K. (2005), "Use of Incinerator Ash as a Replacement for Cement and Sand in Cement Mortars", Building and Environment, Vol. 40, pp. 1261–1266. 9. Lam, C. H. K., Ip, A. W. M., Barford, J. P., and McKay, G. (2010), "Use of Incineration MSW Ash: A Review", Sustainability, Vol. 2, No. 7. 10. Tang, P., Florea, M. V. A., Spiesz, P., and Brouwers, H. J. H. (2014), "The Application of Treated Bottom Ash in Mortar as Cement Replacement". 11. Joseph, A. M., Snellings, R., Van den Heede, P., Matthys, S., and De Belie, N. (2018), "The Use of Municipal Solid Waste Incineration Ash in Various Building Materials: A Belgian Point of View", Materials, Vol. 11. 12. Guo, X., and Zhang, T. (2020), "Utilization of Municipal Solid Waste Incineration Fly Ash to Produce Autoclaved and Modified Wall Blocks", J. Cleaner Production, Vol. 252, 119759. 13. Ashraf, M. S., Ghouleh, Z., and Shao, Y. (2019), "Production of Eco-Cement Exclusively from Municipal Solid Waste Incineration Residues", Resources, Conservation and Recycling, Vol. 149, pp. 332–342. 14. Chen, Z., Liu, Y., Zhu, W., and Yang, E.-H. (2016), "Incinerator Bottom Ash (IBA) Aerated Geopolymer", Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 112, pp. 1025–1031. 15. Pliya, P., and Cree, D. (2015), "Limestone Derived Eggshell Powder as a Replacement in Portland Cement Mortar", Construction and Building Materials, Vol. 95, pp. 1–9. 16. Ngayakamo, B., and Onwualu, A. P. (2022), "Recent Advances in Green Processing Technologies for Valorisation of Eggshell Waste for Sustainable Construction Materials", Heliyon, Vol. 8, e09649. 17. Polettini, A., Pomi, R., and Fortuna, E. (2009), "Chemical Activation in View of MSWI Bottom Ash Recycling in Cement-Based Systems", J. Hazardous Materials, Vol. 162, pp. 1292–1299.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

8/27/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

1

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

5

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...