Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM66305
Volume:
10 |
7 |
Jul 2026
Pages:
1-11
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Department of Civil Engineering
Deogiri Institute of Engineering & Management Studies, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar-431005, Maharashtra, India
Department of Civil Engineering
Deogiri Institute of Engineering & Management Studies, Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar-431005, Maharashtra, India
The accumulation of polyethylene terephthalate (PET) bottle waste continues to grow because of the non-biodegradable nature of the polymer and the limited capacity of conventional disposal routes to process it. This study evaluates the mechanical performance of M50 grade high-strength concrete in which 10% of ordinary Portland cement (OPC 53 grade) was replaced with silica fume and natural fine aggregate was partially replaced with waste PET fibers, both in untreated and cement-silica fume slurry surface-treated form. Five mixes were cast: a control mix without fibers, three mixes containing untreated PET fibers at 0.50%, 0.75% and 1.00% by weight of fine aggregate, and one mix containing 0.75% surface-treated PET fibers. Compressive strength, split tensile strength and flexural strength were determined at 7, 14 and 28 days, and fresh concrete workability was measured using the slump cone test. Among the untreated mixes, the 0.75% dosage gave the best 28-day results (58.31 MPa compressive, 4.41 MPa split tensile and 6.88 MPa flexural strength), closely matching the control mix (58.29 MPa, 4.31 MPa and 6.79 MPa respectively), while the 1.00% dosage caused a decline in all three properties owing to reduced workability and fiber agglomeration. The 0.75% surface-treated PET fiber mix produced the highest strengths overall — 59.37 MPa compressive, 4.57 MPa split tensile and 6.96 MPa flexural strength — confirming that surface treatment strengthens the fiber-cement interfacial bond and improves stress transfer across the matrix. The findings identify 0.75% surface-treated waste PET fiber, combined with 10% silica fume, as the optimum combination for the materials investigated and support the use of recycled PET fibers as a viable, environmentally responsible reinforcement for structural-grade concrete.
KEYWORDS
1. The concrete mix containing 10% silica fume and 0.75% surface-treated PET fiber (TM5) exhibited the best overall mechanical performance among all mixes tested, achieving 28-day compressive, split tensile and flexural strengths of 59.37 MPa, 4.57 MPa and 6.96 MPa respectively. 2. Among the untreated PET fiber mixes, 0.75% dosage (TM3) produced the best performance, with 28-day strengths of 58.31 MPa (compressive), 4.41 MPa (split tensile) and 6.88 MPa (flexural), essentially matching or marginally exceeding the control mix. 3. Increasing the untreated PET fiber content to 1.00% (TM4) reduced all three strength properties relative to the 0.75% dosage, with 28-day compressive strength falling to 54.63 MPa, attributable to reduced workability, fiber agglomeration and non-uniform dispersion. 4. Surface treatment of PET fibers with a cement-silica fume slurry consistently improved mechanical performance relative to untreated fibers at the identical 0.75% dosage, confirming that fiber-matrix interfacial bonding, rather than fiber content alone, governs the effectiveness of PET reinforcement. 5. The improvement in split tensile and flexural strength for the surface-treated mix indicates enhanced crack-bridging behaviour, although this was assessed indirectly in the absence of direct fracture or crack-width testing. 6. The results support 0.75% surface-treated waste PET fiber, combined with 10% silica fume, as the optimum and recommended combination for producing sustainable, high-strength M50 concrete with recycled plastic reinforcement.
[1] Y. Mouna, B. Irfan, M. S. Rahman, and M. Batikha, "A statistical-experimental study to investigate the optimal parameters of fibers made from waste PET bottles for strengthening concrete." [2] D. Hatungimana, B. Malibita, J. Minani, A. Mardani, and H. El-Hassan, "Performance enhancement of concrete using recycled PET fibers from post-consumer bottles." [3] L. A. Abdulateef, S. H. Hassan, and A. M. Ahmed, "Exploring the mechanical behavior of concrete enhanced with fibers derived from recycled plastic bottles," 2024. [4] A. Meza, P. Pujadas, L. M. Meza, F. Pardo-Bosch, and R. D. López-Carreño, "Mechanical optimization of concrete with recycled PET fibers based on a statistical-experimental study," Materials, 2021. [5] I. Vollmer, M. J. F. Jenks, M. C. P. Roelands, R. J. White, T. van Harmelen, P. de Wild, G. P. van der Laan, F. Meirer, J. T. F. Keurentjes, and B. M. Weckhuysen, "Beyond mechanical recycling: giving new life to plastic waste." [6] L. Lebreton and A. Andrady, "Future scenarios of global plastic waste generation and disposal," 2019. [7] D. A. Silva, A. M. Betioli, P. J. P. Gleize, H. R. Roman, L. A. Gómez, and J. L. D. Ribeiro, "Degradation of recycled PET fibers in Portland cement-based materials." [8] H. Toutanji, S. McNeil, and Z. Bayasi, "Chloride permeability and impact resistance of polypropylene-fiber-reinforced silica fume concrete," 1998. [9] O. F. Olusunmade, S. J. Antony, E. Danso-Boateng, V. Sarhosis, and O. C. Ogunnigbo, "Development and optimisation of sustainable recycled PET-sand composites for construction applications." [10] A. Singh and N. Arora, "Impact of silica fume and PET fiber over the strength aspects of the concrete."
Publication Date
7/21/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
6
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...