Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM62643
Volume:
10 |
5 |
May 2026
Pages:
1-5
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Department of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence
Central University of Andhra Pradesh

Department of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence
Central University of Andhra Pradesh
Department of Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence
Central University of Andhra Pradesh
One of the greatest difficulties for farmers in many (developing) countries is income volatility due to crop price fluctuation. Traditional statistical forecasting models often are not capable of modeling the changing, nonlinear characteristic of an agricultural market. In this research we present a drift-aware and interpretable AI system for crop price prediction from heterogeneous sources: weather data, market prices, seasonal effects and crop quality features computed from images of the crop. Our approach is based on a combination of Convolutional Neural Networks (CNN) for computation of crop quality and a Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) for the time series price prediction. The model is able to deal with concept drift occurring in the market via Adaptive Windowing (ADWIN) at the time of prediction, and we are able to understand its predictions with Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Our system offers a prediction accuracy of 96.59%, and we make a prediction on a weekly basis to support farmers' sales decisions.
KEYWORDS
In this paper, the proposed model is a drift-aware, explainable AI framework to predict crop prices by fusing heterogeneous data sources: crop images, weather, market price, and seasonal factors. The proposed framework uses Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) to perform image-based crop quality recognition and Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks to forecast market prices as a time-series data. Additionally, Adaptive Windowing (ADWIN) to adapt to concept drift in market environment and SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) for model explainability. Experimental results show that our framework offers superior prediction accuracy and lower prediction error compared to conventional machine learning models. The fusion of visual quality information and market information represents the agricultural systems with richness and completeness, while the drift detection helps the framework adapt to dynamic market fluctuations. Also, the use of explainable AI helps to understand and trace the cause of prediction in the model. From the application viewpoint, the proposed framework is able to provide efficient decision support to farmers to plan selling strategies according to market price prediction. The system could increase the profits of farmers by diminishing market uncertainties and increasing access to efficient market participation information. However, there still are some limitations to our proposed system. Firstly, the quality and availability of data can greatly affect the performance of the model, especially in areas with limited digital access. Secondly, the generalization capability across various crops and geographical regions of the model needs further study. In addition, the complexity of the deep learning models may lead to increased deployment difficulty in resource-constrained environments.
[1] Hyndman, R. J., & Athanasopoulos, G. (2018). Forecasting: Principles and practice (2nd ed.). OTexts, https://otexts.com/fpp2/. [2] Hochreiter, S., & Schmidhuber, J. (1997). Long short-term memory. Neural Computation, 9(8), 1735–1780, https://doi.org/10.1162/neco.1997.9.8.1735. [3] Kamilaris, A., & Prenafeta-Boldú, F. X. (2018). Deep learning in agriculture: A survey. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, 147, 70–90, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2018.02.016. [4] Lundberg, S. M., & Lee, S.-I. (2017). A unified approach to interpreting model predictions. In Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems (NeurIPS), https://papers.nips.cc/paper/7062-a-unified-approach-to-interpreting-model-predictions. [5] Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., & Courville, A. (2016). Deep learning. MIT Press, https://www.deeplearningbook.org. [6] Wolfert, S., Ge, L., Verdouw, C., & Bogaardt, M. J. (2017). Big data in smart farming: A review. Agricultural Systems, 153, 69–80, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agsy.2017.01.023. [7] You, J., Li, X., Low, M., Lobell, D., & Ermon, S. (2017). Deep Gaussian process for crop yield prediction. In Proceedings of the AAAI Conference on Artificial Intelligence, https://ojs.aaai.org/index.php/AAAI/article/view/10644 [8] Zhang, G. P. (2003). Time series forecasting using a hybrid ARIMA and neural network model. Neurocomputing, 50, 159–175, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0925-2312(01)00702-0. [9] Bifet, A., & Gavaldà, R. (2007). Learning from time-changing data with adaptive windowing. In Proceedings of the SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539. [10] Liakos, K. G., Busato, P., Moshou, D., Pearson, S., & Bochtis, D. (2018). Machine learning in agriculture: A review. Sensors, 18(8), 2674, https://doi.org/10.3390/s18082674.
Publication Date
5/6/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
8
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...