Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM53123
Volume:
9 |
10 |
Oct 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
The rapid evolution of generative artificial intelligence has redefined how machines process, reason, and communicate knowledge. Yet, the opaqueness of large language models (LLMs) continues to challenge their trustworthiness and interpretability in critical domains. This research introduces a comprehensive framework for explainable generative AI (GenAI) that seeks to decode and visualize the internal reasoning pathways of LLMs. The study integrates cognitive-inspired interpretability mechanisms with retrieval-augmented generation and semantic attribution mapping to uncover how contextual evidence shapes model responses. A novel visualization engine is developed to translate these latent reasoning traces into human-understandable graphical narratives, offering transparency across token-level, layer-level, and decision-level dimensions. Through systematic evaluation on benchmark reasoning datasets and domain-specific case studies, the proposed techniques demonstrate measurable improvements in faithfulness, causal coherence, and user interpretability. Beyond algorithmic transparency, the work also explores the epistemic implications of machine reasoning — bridging human cognitive interpretability and computational inference. The research ultimately positions explainable GenAI as a step toward ethically aligned, auditable, and cognitively comprehensible artificial reasoning systems capable of fostering accountability in next-generation intelligent technologies.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
10/18/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
5
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...