Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM62003
Volume:
10 |
4 |
April 2026
Pages:
1-12
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Bachelor of Business Administration
Maharaja Surajmal Institute
Serial entrepreneurship — the act of founding multiple ventures sequentially — presents a paradox: failure is common yet experienced entrepreneurs appear to leverage prior failure as a springboard for subsequent success. This study examines the interplay of three core constructs — failure tolerance, psychological resilience, and social capital — in shaping the performance outcomes of serial entrepreneurs. Grounded in Experiential Learning Theory and the Resource-Based View, we develop and test a conceptual model using a mixed-methods design comprising a survey of 284 serial entrepreneurs across India, the United Kingdom, and the United States, complemented by 22 in-depth interviews. Results indicate that failure tolerance and resilience jointly mediate the relationship between prior venture failure and subsequent venture success, while social capital — particularly bridging ties — significantly moderates this pathway. Entrepreneurs who reframe failure as instructive, maintain adaptive coping strategies, and sustain diverse relational networks demonstrate markedly higher success rates in follow-on ventures. The findings extend entrepreneurship theory and offer targeted guidance for ecosystem builders, incubators, accelerators, and policymakers aiming to cultivate environments that enable productive failure and durable entrepreneurial careers.
KEYWORDS
Failing forward is not a passive process — it is the product of deliberate psychological work, relational investment, and institutional support. This study demonstrates that serial entrepreneurship success is not simply the reward for persistence, but the outcome of a structured transformation process in which failure is cognitively reframed, emotionally processed, and relationally resourced. Failure tolerance creates the conditions for resilience; resilience, amplified by diverse social capital, translates into venture performance. For entrepreneurs, ecosystem builders, and scholars alike, these findings invite a fundamental reorientation: from viewing failure as an aberration to be minimized, toward recognizing it as the most powerful, and most underutilized, school of entrepreneurship we have.
Ayala, J. C., & Manzano, G. (2014). The resilience of the entrepreneur: Influence on the success of the business. A longitudinal analysis. Journal of Economic Psychology, 42, 126–135. Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. Bullough, A., & Renko, M. (2013). Entrepreneurial resilience during challenging times. Business Horizons, 56(3), 343–350. Burt, R. S. (2004). Structural holes and good ideas. American Journal of Sociology, 110(2), 349–399. Cope, J. (2011). Entrepreneurial learning from failure: An interpretative phenomenological analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(6), 604–623. Dweck, C. S. (2006). Mindset: The new psychology of success. Random House. Edelman, L., & Yli-Renko, H. (2010). The impact of environment and entrepreneurial perceptions on venture-creation efforts: Bridging the discovery and creation views of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(5), 833–856. Frankish, J. S., Roberts, R. G., Coad, A., Spears, T. C., & Storey, D. J. (2013). Do entrepreneurs really learn? Or do they just tell us that they do? Industrial and Corporate Change, 22(1), 73–106. Gompers, P., Kovner, A., Lerner, J., & Scharfstein, D. (2010). Performance persistence in entrepreneurship. Journal of Financial Economics, 96(1), 18–32. Headd, B. (2003). Redefining business success: Distinguishing between closure and failure. Small Business Economics, 21(1), 51–61. Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall. Luthans, F., Youssef, C. M., & Avolio, B. J. (2006). Psychological capital: Developing the human competitive edge. Oxford University Press. McGrath, R. G. (1999). Falling forward: Real options reasoning and entrepreneurial failure. Academy of Management Review, 24(1), 13–30. Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. Simon & Schuster. Shepherd, D. A. (2003). Learning from business failure: Propositions of grief recovery for the self-employed. Academy of Management Review, 28(2), 318–328. Shepherd, D. A., Wennberg, K., Suddaby, R., & Wiklund, J. (2019). What are we explaining? A review and agenda on initiating, engaging, performing, and contextualizing entrepreneurship. Journal of Management, 45(1), 159–196. Ucbasaran, D., Shepherd, D. A., Lockett, A., & Lyon, S. J. (2013). Life after business failure: The process and consequences of business failure for entrepreneurs. Journal of Management, 39(1), 163–202. Ucbasaran, D., Westhead, P., Wright, M., & Flores, M. (2010). The nature of entrepreneurial experience, business failure and comparative optimism. Journal of Business Venturing, 25(6), 541–555. Wyrwich, M., Wyrwich, M., Stuetzer, M., & Sternberg, R. (2016). Entrepreneurial role models, fear of failure, and institutional approval of entrepreneurship: A tale of two regions. Small Business Economics, 46(3), 467–492.
Publication Date
4/30/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...