Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM68644

Fake News Detection System Using Machine Learning

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM68644

Volume:

10 |

10 |

Oct 2026

Pages:

1-6

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM68644

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

Prajna H Gouda

Prajna H Gouda

Department of Computer Science and Engineering (Data Science)

SJB institute of technology

Download Author Certificate
Jasma Bhavani B

Jasma Bhavani B

Department of Computer Science and Engineering (Data Science)

SJB institute of technology

Download Co-Author Certificate
K.Nandini

K.Nandini

Department of Computer Science and Engineering (Data Science)

SJB institute of technology

Download Co-Author Certificate
Monika M S

Monika M S

Department of Computer Science and Engineering (Data Science)

SJB institute of technology

Download Co-Author Certificate

Mentors

Jasma Bhavani B

Jasma Bhavani B

Department of Computer Science and Engineering (Data Science)

SJB institute of technology

Download Mentor Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

Online misinformation can circulate rapidly through social platforms and news aggregators, making manual verification difficult to apply at scale. This survey reviews major computational approaches to fake-news detection, including rule-based and linguistic techniques, conventional machine-learning classifiers, deep neural networks, and transformer models. It discusses text preparation, feature representation, classification methods, benchmark datasets, evaluation measures, and recurring limitations. The paper also describes our two-part prototype. The first component is a Java text classifier built with TF-IDF features and Multinomial Naive Bayes in Weka. On the reported 80/20 split of the ISOT dataset (44,889 articles), it achieved 95.23% accuracy, 96.34% precision, 94.61% recall, and a 95.47% F1-score. These figures describe performance on that dataset and should not be interpreted as evidence of equivalent performance on arbitrary current claims. The second component gathers contextual material from Google News RSS, NewsAPI, and Wikipedia, then sends the claim and retrieved material to the Gemini API for a REAL, FAKE, or UNVERIFIED assessment. This live component has been checked manually; no formal accuracy score is currently available. The survey concludes by considering dataset bias and ageing, adversarial wording, evidence quality, and the trade-off between model transparency and predictive performance.

KEYWORDS

Fake news detection Natural Language Processing TF-IDF Naive Bayes Text Classification Evidence Retrieval Wikipedia Survey.

Cite This Article

Prajna H Gouda, Jasma Bhavani B, K.Nandini, Monika M S, Jasma Bhavani B, "Fake News Detection System Using Machine Learning," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 1-6, Oct 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM68644

Full Article/Conclusion

This paper reviewed text-based and evidence-assisted approaches to fake-news detection and described a prototype with two complementary components. The first uses TF-IDF and Multinomial Naive Bayes and achieved 95.23% accuracy on the reported ISOT test split. That score reflects classification within the dataset and does not establish factual correctness for unseen news. The second component retrieves material from Google News RSS, NewsAPI, and Wikipedia and asks Gemini to assess a claim as REAL, FAKE, or UNVERIFIED. This component has been manually tested but has not yet undergone formal accuracy evaluation. The main priorities are to test generalisation across sources and time periods, measure live-verification performance with labelled claims, improve reproducibility, and communicate uncertainty responsibly. These limitations reflect broader challenges involving accuracy, interpretability, evidence quality, and computational cost.

References

[1]     S. Vosoughi, D. Roy, and S. Aral, “The spread of true and false news online,” Science, vol. 359, no. 6380, pp. 1146–1151, 2018, doi: 10.1126/science.aap9559. [2]     D. M. J. Lazer et al., “The science of fake news,” Science, vol. 359, no. 6380, pp. 1094–1096, 2018, doi: 10.1126/science.aao2998. [3]     K. Shu, A. Sliva, S. Wang, J. Tang, and H. Liu, “Fake news detection on social media: A data mining perspective,” ACM SIGKDD Explor. Newsl., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 22–36, 2017, doi: 10.1145/3137597.3137600. [4]     X. Zhou and R. Zafarani, “A survey of fake news: Fundamental theories, detection methods, and opportunities,” ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 1–40, 2020, doi: 10.1145/3395046. [5]     H. Rashkin, E. Choi, J. Y. Jang, S. Volkova, and Y. Choi, “Truth of varying shades: Analyzing language in fake news and political fact-checking,” in Proc. EMNLP, 2017, pp. 2931–2937, doi: 10.18653/v1/D17-1317. [6]     V. Pérez-Rosas et al., “Automatic detection of fake news,” in Proc. COLING, 2018. [7]     K. Spärck Jones, “A statistical interpretation of term specificity and its application in retrieval,” J. Documentation, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 11–21, 1972. [8]     H. Ahmed, I. Traore, and S. Saad, “Detection of online fake news using n-gram analysis and machine learning techniques,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Intelligent, Secure, and Dependable Systems in Distributed and Cloud Environments (ISDDC), 2017, pp. 127–138, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-69155-8_9. [9]     T. Mikolov, K. Chen, G. Corrado, and J. Dean, “Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space,” arXiv:1301.3781, 2013. [10]   J. Pennington, R. Socher, and C. D. Manning, “GloVe: Global vectors for word representation,” in Proc. EMNLP, 2014, pp. 1532–1543.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

10/31/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

8

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...