Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM68644
Volume:
10 |
10 |
Oct 2026
Pages:
1-6
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Department of Computer Science and Engineering (Data Science)
SJB institute of technology

Department of Computer Science and Engineering (Data Science)
SJB institute of technology

Department of Computer Science and Engineering (Data Science)
SJB institute of technology

Department of Computer Science and Engineering (Data Science)
SJB institute of technology

Department of Computer Science and Engineering (Data Science)
SJB institute of technology
Online misinformation can circulate rapidly through social platforms and news aggregators, making manual verification difficult to apply at scale. This survey reviews major computational approaches to fake-news detection, including rule-based and linguistic techniques, conventional machine-learning classifiers, deep neural networks, and transformer models. It discusses text preparation, feature representation, classification methods, benchmark datasets, evaluation measures, and recurring limitations. The paper also describes our two-part prototype. The first component is a Java text classifier built with TF-IDF features and Multinomial Naive Bayes in Weka. On the reported 80/20 split of the ISOT dataset (44,889 articles), it achieved 95.23% accuracy, 96.34% precision, 94.61% recall, and a 95.47% F1-score. These figures describe performance on that dataset and should not be interpreted as evidence of equivalent performance on arbitrary current claims. The second component gathers contextual material from Google News RSS, NewsAPI, and Wikipedia, then sends the claim and retrieved material to the Gemini API for a REAL, FAKE, or UNVERIFIED assessment. This live component has been checked manually; no formal accuracy score is currently available. The survey concludes by considering dataset bias and ageing, adversarial wording, evidence quality, and the trade-off between model transparency and predictive performance.
KEYWORDS
This paper reviewed text-based and evidence-assisted approaches to fake-news detection and described a prototype with two complementary components. The first uses TF-IDF and Multinomial Naive Bayes and achieved 95.23% accuracy on the reported ISOT test split. That score reflects classification within the dataset and does not establish factual correctness for unseen news. The second component retrieves material from Google News RSS, NewsAPI, and Wikipedia and asks Gemini to assess a claim as REAL, FAKE, or UNVERIFIED. This component has been manually tested but has not yet undergone formal accuracy evaluation. The main priorities are to test generalisation across sources and time periods, measure live-verification performance with labelled claims, improve reproducibility, and communicate uncertainty responsibly. These limitations reflect broader challenges involving accuracy, interpretability, evidence quality, and computational cost.
[1] S. Vosoughi, D. Roy, and S. Aral, “The spread of true and false news online,” Science, vol. 359, no. 6380, pp. 1146–1151, 2018, doi: 10.1126/science.aap9559. [2] D. M. J. Lazer et al., “The science of fake news,” Science, vol. 359, no. 6380, pp. 1094–1096, 2018, doi: 10.1126/science.aao2998. [3] K. Shu, A. Sliva, S. Wang, J. Tang, and H. Liu, “Fake news detection on social media: A data mining perspective,” ACM SIGKDD Explor. Newsl., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 22–36, 2017, doi: 10.1145/3137597.3137600. [4] X. Zhou and R. Zafarani, “A survey of fake news: Fundamental theories, detection methods, and opportunities,” ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 53, no. 5, pp. 1–40, 2020, doi: 10.1145/3395046. [5] H. Rashkin, E. Choi, J. Y. Jang, S. Volkova, and Y. Choi, “Truth of varying shades: Analyzing language in fake news and political fact-checking,” in Proc. EMNLP, 2017, pp. 2931–2937, doi: 10.18653/v1/D17-1317. [6] V. Pérez-Rosas et al., “Automatic detection of fake news,” in Proc. COLING, 2018. [7] K. Spärck Jones, “A statistical interpretation of term specificity and its application in retrieval,” J. Documentation, vol. 28, no. 1, pp. 11–21, 1972. [8] H. Ahmed, I. Traore, and S. Saad, “Detection of online fake news using n-gram analysis and machine learning techniques,” in Proc. Int. Conf. Intelligent, Secure, and Dependable Systems in Distributed and Cloud Environments (ISDDC), 2017, pp. 127–138, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-69155-8_9. [9] T. Mikolov, K. Chen, G. Corrado, and J. Dean, “Efficient estimation of word representations in vector space,” arXiv:1301.3781, 2013. [10] J. Pennington, R. Socher, and C. D. Manning, “GloVe: Global vectors for word representation,” in Proc. EMNLP, 2014, pp. 1532–1543.
Publication Date
10/31/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
8
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...