Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM66621
Volume:
10 |
8 |
Aug 2026
Pages:
1-5
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Department of Computer Science
Malnad College of Engineering

Department of Computer Science
Malnad College of Engineering

Department of Computer Science
Malnad College of Engineering

Department of Computer Science
Malnad College of Engineering

Department of Computer Science
Malnad College of Engineering
Identifying whether a news article is real or fabri-cated has become a pressing need in today’s information-heavy environment. This paper describes a detection system built using Natural Language Processing and Machine Learning, where article text is cleaned through a five-step pipeline, converted to TF-IDF feature vectors, and then classified by one of four trained models: Logistic Regression, Naive Bayes, Decision Tree, and Support Vector Machine. All four classifiers were trained and tested under the same experimental setup. The paper includes a block diagram and a clear description of how the system works at each stage. Results show that even relatively simple ML classifiers can achieve good detection accuracy when the text preprocessing is handled carefully, without requiring the computational expense of deep learning models.
KEYWORDS
This paper presented a fake news detection system that uses a five-step NLP preprocessing pipeline combined with TF-IDF feature extraction and four ML classifiers. The preprocessing steps — lowercasing, punctuation removal, stopword removal, tokenisation, and stemming — clean and compress the raw article text before it is turned into a numerical vector. The system architecture was explained using a block diagram and a clear step-by-step description of how data moves through each stage. Among the four classifiers, Logistic Regression performed best, with SVM close behind. Both gave balanced precision, recall, and F1-score values across both the real and fake classes, meaning neither was biased toward one label. Naive Bayes was a strong option when training speed matters. Decision Tree showed clear signs of overfitting and should not be used without ensemble support for this type of task. Ablation testing confirmed that preprocessing genuinely helps; accuracy dropped when steps were removed. The final system is compact, interpretable, and does not require expensive hardware or external data, making it a realistic option for real-world use.
[1] J. Jouhar and M. Ahmed, “Fake News Detection Using Machine Learning Techniques,” Int. J. Comput. Appl., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 45–52, 2024. [2] R. N. Tanaja and P. Kumar, “Machine Learning Models for Fake News Classification,” J. Artif. Intell. Res., vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 101–109, 2025. [3] O. Embarak and S. Ali, “Deep Learning for Fake News Detection,” Int. J. Adv. Comput., vol. 9, no. 4, pp. 67–75, 2025. [4] R. K. Ayyasamy and K. Ravi, “Hybrid Deep Learning Framework for Fake News Detection,” IEEE Access, vol. 13, pp. 1100–1110, 2025. [5] S. Cui and L. Wang, “Fake News Detection Based on Shared Information and Ambiguity Learning,” J. Inf. Process. Syst., vol. 12, no. 3, pp. 211–220, 2026. [6] K. Shu, A. Sliva, S. Wang, J. Tang, and H. Liu, “Fake News Detection on Social Media: A Data Mining Perspective,” ACM SIGKDD Explor. Newsl., vol. 19, no. 1, pp. 22–36, 2017. [7] W. Y. Wang, “‘Liar, Liar Pants on Fire’: A New Benchmark Dataset for Fake News Detection,” in Proc. 55th Annu. Meet. ACL, Vancouver, Canada, 2017, pp. 422–426. [8] C. Castillo, M. Mendoza, and B. Poblete, “Information Credibility on Twitter,” in Proc. 20th Int. Conf. World Wide Web, Hyderabad, India, 2011, pp. 675–684.
Publication Date
8/8/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...