Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM27893
Volume:
8 |
1 |
Jan 2024
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
With the exponential growth of online user-generated content, the issue of fake reviews has become a significant concern, impacting consumer decisions and trust in online platforms. Detecting fake reviews manually is challenging due to the sheer volume of reviews generated daily. This paper proposes a novel approach utilizing deep learning techniques for the automated detection of fake reviews. The study focuses on employing Convolutional Neural Networks (CNNs) and Recurrent Neural Networks (RNNs) to extract meaningful features from textual and contextual information within reviews. The proposed model integrates word embeddings and attention mechanisms to capture intricate patterns and dependencies within review texts. Furthermore, the research leverages a dataset of labeled reviews, distinguishing between genuine and fake reviews using various linguistic, behavioral, and sentiment-based features. The model is trained, validated, and fine-tuned using this dataset to enhance its ability to generalize across different review platforms and domains. Experimental results demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed deep learning model in accurately identifying fake reviews, achieving state-of-the-art performance metrics such as precision, recall, and F1-score.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
12/31/45294
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...