Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM47869
Volume:
9 |
5 |
May 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
social media has reshaped global interactions, offering unprecedented networking opportunities for individuals and businesses. However, its widespread reach also facilitates the rapid spread of harmful content, including hate speech directed at race, gender, religion, and disabilities, potentially causing significant emotional harm. To mitigate these challenges ML and DL techniques are becoming essential tools in identifying fraudulent social media profiles. These advanced methods analyse behavioural patterns, account details, and interactions to detect anomalies that indicate deceptive activity. ML algorithms classify suspicious accounts based on predefined features, while deep learning models—such as neural networks—process vast amounts of data to uncover more complex fraudulent tactics. As fraudsters evolve their strategies, AI-driven solutions continue to improve, enhancing social media security and protecting users from misinformation and scams. This study evaluates six ML models Neural Networks (NN), Naive Bayes (NB), Logistic Regression (LR), XGBoost (XGB), Random Forest (RF), and Support Vector Machine (SVM)using real-time datasets that have undergone pre-processing to optimize feature extraction. Among the evaluated models, SVM achieved the highest accuracy, surpassing both SVM and NB in precision, recall, and F1-score
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
5/14/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...