Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM65104
Volume:
10 |
6 |
Jun 2026
Pages:
1-4
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

School of Commerce and Management Studies
Sandip University, Nashik
School of Commerce and Management Studies
Sandip University, Nashik
Indian digital banking fraud detection systems are having a problem. They are incorrectly flagging transactions as fraudulent. This is what we call positives. It is a challenge in Indias rapidly growing digital payments ecosystem. The main reason for this growth is the Unified Payments Interface or UPI for short. When there are a lot of positives it leads to legitimate transactions being declined. This makes customers unhappy. Causes operational inefficiencies. It also results in revenue. This paper is going to look at the issue of positives in the Indian context. We will be drawing on rule-based legacy systems and emerging Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning solutions. We will also be looking at case studies, such as the ones from the State Bank of India ICICI and HDFC. Additionally, we will be looking at benchmarks like the ones from Danske Bank and BBVA. We will also be getting insights from research scholars and industry experts. Advanced techniques like Machine Learning and Deep Learning models behavioural analytics and feature engineering have been shown to reduce false positives by 15-80%. At the time they are able to maintain high detection rates. The main recommendations are to use real-time systems, Explainable Artificial Intelligence and regulatory support like the initiatives from the Reserve Bank of India.
KEYWORDS
There are challenges like privacy, concept drift and scalability. In the future we can expect to see the Reserve Bank of Indias Digital Payments Intelligence Platform, federated learning and advanced biometrics. 7. Advancements in Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning combined with regulatory initiatives and global lessons can offer substantial reductions in false positives. This can lead to a customer experience and improved fraud prevention.
1. Lingareddy, N. (2025). Enhancing Digital Payment Security: UPI Fraud Detection with Advanced Machine Learning Algorithms. IEEE Conference Publication. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/11077038/ (Accuracy 98.7%, False Positive Rate 1.2%). 2. Sethi, B., Mhatre, S., Yadav, S., Das, S., & Jadhav, V. (2025). Machine Learning-Based UPI Fraud Detection: A Comprehensive Approach Using Random Forest. Atlantis Press. (Precision 97%, strong minimization of false positives). 3. Kumar, J. (2025). Optimized Machine Learning and Deep Learning Approaches for UPI Fraud Detection. International Journal of Science and Advanced Technology. 4. (2026). A Convolutional Neural Network Framework for Real-Time UPI Fraud Detection. TIJER. (Accuracy 97.8%, Precision 96.4%, False Positive Rate 1.4%). 5. (2026). AI-Based Detection and Analysis of Fraud in UPI Transactions. Mazedan. (Low FP count of 28 in confusion matrix example). 6. (2026). UPI Fraud Detection and Prevention. ResearchGate. (95.7% detection accuracy on >5 million anonymous UPI transactions). 7. Various authors (2025). Papers in IJERT, IJCRT, IJISRT, and IRJET on ensemble methods, Isolation Forest, LSTM, and hybrid models for UPI fraud detection emphasizing FP reduction. 8. Reserve Bank of India (RBI). (2025–2026). Digital Payments Intelligence Platform (DPIP) – AI/ML-based real-time risk scoring and intelligence sharing to reduce false positives in digital payments. 9. RBI & NPCI initiatives (including MuleHunter.AI pilot) for mule account detection and behavioural analytics in UPI ecosystem. 10. State Bank of India (SBI) & ICICI Bank Pilots (2025). ML-based systems reduced false positives by ~15%, improved real-time UPI monitoring. 11. HDFC Bank + Mastercard AI Integration. Real-time behavioural analytics for fraud detection, significantly lowering false alerts.
Publication Date
6/17/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
9
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...