Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM35423
Volume:
8 |
6 |
Jun 2024
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Feedback Forge is an innovative online platform designed to enhance users’ writing skills through personalized feedback. Traditional feedback mechanisms often struggle to provide timely and relevant guidance, hindering skill development. In response, Feedback Forge leverages advanced technologies, including artificial intelligence and machine learning, to deliver tailored feedback at scale. This paper explores the landscape of feedback mechanisms, highlighting the limitations of traditional methods and the potential of technology-driven solutions. Key themes include the importance of feedback in skill development, challenges faced by traditional mechanisms, and the promise of technology-driven approaches. Moreover, Feedback Forge addresses a critical need in education and professional development by democratizing access to high-quality feedback. It offers a solution to individuals seeking to refine their writing skills independently, without the constraints of traditional feedback channels. By providing personalized feedback, Feedback Forge empowers users to identify areas for improvement, refine their writing techniques, and achieve their learning objectives effectively. In conclusion, Feedback Forge represents a significant advancement in feedback provision, bridging the gap between traditional practices and modern technology. Its implementation underscores the importance of leveraging AI-driven analysis to optimize learning outcomes in the digital age. This paper advocates for continued exploration and evaluation of technology-driven feedback mechanisms to promote skill development and lifelong learning in diverse contexts.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
3/5/2024
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
0
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...