Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM68366
Volume:
10 |
10 |
Oct 2026
Pages:
1-5
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

SRM School of Law
SRM Institute of Science and Technology, Kattankulathur
The explosive growth of retail participation in the Indian stock market has been heavily catalyzed by social media financial influencers, colloquially known as 'finfluencers.' While these individuals have democratized financial literacy, the proliferation of unregistered and often conflicted financial advice has raised severe consumer protection concerns. This doctrinal research paper provides an extensive examination of the Securities and Exchange Board of India’s (SEBI) regulatory framework governing finfluencers, conducting a deep-dive analysis into its corporate investigative powers under existing statutes. Furthermore, the paper explores the complex dynamics of online accountability, evaluating the limits of public scrutiny and the delicate constitutional balance between safeguarding investor interests and protecting freedom of speech in the digital age. By dissecting the nuances of regulatory authority, discovery mechanisms, consumer rights liabilities, and dispute resolution paradigms, this study underscores the necessity of a robust enforcement mechanism against market manipulation facilitated through borderless digital channels. The paper culminates in a comparative global analysis and proposes a comprehensive policy roadmap for mitigating digital financial fraud.
KEYWORDS
The ascendancy of finfluencers represents a permanent, structural evolution in the dissemination and consumption of financial information in India. While acknowledging their contribution to the democratization of financial knowledge, the sheer scale of their influence necessitates a rigorous, enforceable framework of online accountability. SEBI’s current regulatory posture, anchored in its extensive investigative powers under the SEBI Act and augmented by the IA and RA regulations, forms a vital bulwark against predatory digital practices. The regulator's capacity to trace digital footprints, compel discovery, and order the disgorgement of unlawful gains demonstrates that the principles of market integrity extend firmly into the digital realm. However, doctrinal analysis confirms that statutory enforcement by a securities regulator alone cannot completely eradicate the multifarious risks of digital fraud. Relying on the inherent limits of public scrutiny is a demonstrably flawed strategy. A holistic, inter-jurisdictional framework is required—one that seamlessly integrates the investigative powers of SEBI with the endorser liability and expedited dispute resolution mechanisms of the Consumer Protection Act. By mandating absolute transparency in revenue models, modernizing registration frameworks, and imposing stringent obligations on digital platforms, India can foster a safe, transparent, and equitable retail investment ecosystem. Ultimately, ensuring online accountability mandates a continuous, collaborative effort to guarantee that the democratization of finance does not devolve into the systematic exploitation of the uninformed.
[1] Securities and Exchange Board of India Act, 1992, No. 15, Acts of Parliament, 1992 (India). [2] Securities and Exchange Board of India (Investment Advisers) Regulations, 2013, SEBI Notification No. LAD-NRO/GN/2012-13/31/1778, Jan. 21, 2013. [3] Securities and Exchange Board of India (Research Analysts) Regulations, 2014, SEBI Notification No. LAD-NRO/GN/2014-15/07/1414, Sep. 1, 2014. [4] Consumer Protection Act, 2019, No. 35, Acts of Parliament, 2019 (India). [5] Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, No. 5, Acts of Parliament, 1908 (India). [6] Advertising Standards Council of India, "Guidelines for Influencer Advertising in Digital Media," ASCI, 2021 (Updated 2023). [7] Central Consumer Protection Authority, "Guidelines for Prevention of Misleading Advertisements and Endorsements for Misleading Advertisements," 2022. [8] P. K. Sharma and R. Singh, "The Impact of Social Media on Retail Investor Behavior in Emerging Markets: A Behavioral Finance Perspective," Journal of Behavioral Finance, vol. 18, no. 4, pp. 312-325, Nov. 2022. [9] M. Desai, "Regulatory Challenges of Finfluencers in the Indian Securities Market: Intersections of Law and Technology," Asian Journal of Law and Economics, vol. 12, no. 2, pp. 45-67, 2023. [10] Australian Securities and Investments Commission (ASIC), "Discussing financial products and services online (INFO 269)," 2022.
Publication Date
10/26/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
5
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...