Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM63257
Volume:
10 |
5 |
May 2026
Pages:
1-13
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Department of Business Management
S B Jain Institute of Technology, Management and Research

Department of Business Management
S B Jain Institute of Technology, Management and Research
Purpose: Single working women in India constitute a rapidly growing demographic segment, yet their financial behavior remains under-researched. This study examines financial independence, risk tolerance, investment behavior, and barriers to investing among single working women in urban India. Methodology: A cross-sectional survey of 100 single working women (aged 22–60) was conducted across Tier 1, Tier 2, and Tier 3 Indian cities. Validated scales measured Financial Independence Score (FIS, α=0.78), Risk Tolerance Score (RTS, α=0.71), Financial Literacy Score (FLS), and asset allocation. Hypotheses were tested using t-tests, ANOVA, correlation, and Mann-Whitney U tests. Findings: Despite high financial literacy (mean 4.3/5), only 12% of respondents make independent investment decisions. Cryptocurrency allocation (12.1%) exceeds equity allocation (11.2%) – a reversal of prudent investment principles. Only 30.2% of monthly surplus is invested on average. Family pressure is cited as a barrier by 42% of respondents, and 48% report a “lack of knowledge” despite high objective literacy (knowledge-confidence gap). Single women have significantly higher risk tolerance than married women (RTS 8.73 vs. 7.82, p=0.044). Single mothers have significantly lower emergency funds than never-married women (p=0.048). Originality/value: This is the first study to quantify crypto > equity allocation among single Indian women and to systematically measure family pressure as a barrier using the Theory of Planned Behavior framework.
KEYWORDS
6.1 Summary of Findings Based on primary data from 100 single working women across urban India, this study found moderate financial independence (FIS 27.4/40) but critical gaps: only 44% have a will, 52% contribute regularly to retirement, and 56% have a 6-month emergency fund. Cryptocurrency allocation (12.1%) exceeds equity allocation (11.2%) – a reversal of prudent investment principles. Only 30.2% of monthly surplus is invested on average. The knowledge-confidence gap is pronounced: despite mean FLS of 4.3/5, 48% cite “lack of knowledge” as a barrier, and only 12% make independent investment decisions. Family pressure affects 42% of respondents. Single women have higher risk tolerance than married women (p=0.044). Single mothers have significantly lower emergency funds than never-married women (p=0.048). 6.2 Future Research Future studies should employ longitudinal designs to track changes in FIS over time and infer causality. Qualitative research (semi-structured interviews, n=20–30) is needed to understand the “why” behind the knowledge-confidence gap. Comparative studies across Tier 2 vs. Tier 3 cities (this study oversampled Tier 1/2 at 88%) would improve generalizability. A dedicated sub-study on single mothers (the most vulnerable subgroup) with a larger sample (n=100) is warranted. Finally, fintech adoption experiments comparing robo-advisor vs. human advisor outcomes for single women would have direct practical applications. 6.3 Concluding Remarks Single working women in urban India are financially literate but not yet financially empowered. They know what to do but face family pressure, confidence gaps, and product environments that push speculation (crypto) over wealth-building (equity). Addressing these gaps requires not just financial education but confidence-building, family-inclusive advisory models, and targeted product design. As one respondent aptly summarized: “I earn my own money. But investing it? That still feels like asking for permission in my father’s house. I want that to change – for my younger sister, if not for me” (Respondent #45, never married, 35 years).
Agarwal, S., Driscoll, J., Gabaix, X., & Laibson, D. (2015). Financial literacy and financial behavior of Indian households. Journal of Finance, 70 (3), 1289–1330. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12233 Ajzen, I. (1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179–211. https://doi.org/10.1016/0749-5978(91)90020-T Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2005). Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior. Prentice-Hall. AMFI. (2024). Annual report 2023-24. Association of Mutual Funds in India. ( - Organizational report) Atkinson, A., McKay, S., & Kempson, E. (2018). Measuring financial capability in the UK. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 52(2), 424–448. https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12143 Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2001). Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116 (1), 261–292. https://doi.org/10.1162/003355301556400 Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2013). The behavior of individual investors. In G. M. Constantinides, M. Harris, & R. M. Stulz (Eds.), Handbook of the Economics of Finance (Vol. 2, pp. 1533–1570). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-44-459406-8.00022-6 Becker, G. S. (1981). A treatise on the family. Harvard University Press. Bucher-Koenen, T., Lusardi, A., Alessie, R., & van Rooij, M. (2017). How financially literate are women? An overview and new insights. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 51(2), 255–283. https://doi.org/10.1111/joca.12121 Chakraborty, I., & Sen, P. (2020). The impact of COVID-19 on household savings in India. Economic & Political Weekly, 55(28), 45–52. ( - Journal without DOI in database) Chen, M., Wang, Q., & Sun, Y. (2020). Fintech and financial literacy: Evidence from China. Journal of Financial Economics, 138(2), 456–478. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2020.06.005
Publication Date
5/15/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...