Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM67845

FINANCIAL STATEMENT FRAUD DETECTION USING ALTMAN Z-SCORE AND BENISH M-SCORE: a comparative case study of Dewan Housing Finance Corporation limited(DHFL) and LIC Housing Finance limited in the Indian Context

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM67845

Volume:

10 |

10 |

Oct 2026

Pages:

1-18

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM67845

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

Varanasi Shivatejitha

Varanasi Shivatejitha

Bachelor of Business Administration

Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation

Download Author Certificate
DKV

Dr.Ajay Kumar Varshney

Bachelor of Business Administration

Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation

Download Co-Author Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

Continued financial statement fraud (FSF) is adversely impacting investor confidence and capital market stability worldwide. This research analyzes the suitability of the two most recognized models for detecting financial frauds in the form of Altman's Z-score model and Beneish's M-score model through a selective comparative case analysis of two Indian housing finance companies: the case company of Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Limited (DHFL), which is an identified case of financial manipulation being investigated by the Indian regulators since 2019, and its industry matched company of LIC Housing Finance Limited (LIC HF) that has no record of being investigated or involved in any accounting restatement. Audited standalone financial statements of the two companies have been analyzed on the basis of the four consecutive financial years from FY2015 to FY2018, i.e., the four consecutive financial years preceding the revelation of financial manipulations by DHFL. The study has estimated both the models' ratios and calculated their composite scores year wise and compared the trend of two companies. Both models have been well tested in advanced economies and, to some extent, in developing nations, but no prior study exists where these two models have been used together on a verified Indian housing finance company fraud case with direct comparisons made to its competitor firm on a year-to-year basis. It is the purpose of this research paper to fill this void, in addition to pointing out certain data quality issues in DHFL's FY2017 financial statements.

KEYWORDS

Keywords: Financial Statement Fraud Altman Z-Score Beneish M-Score Earnings Manipulation Forensic Accounting Housing Finance DHFL LIC Housing Finance India

Cite This Article

Varanasi Shivatejitha, Dr.Ajay Kumar Varshney, "FINANCIAL STATEMENT FRAUD DETECTION USING ALTMAN Z-SCORE AND BENISH M-SCORE: a comparative case study of Dewan Housing Finance Corporation limited(DHFL) and LIC Housing Finance limited in the Indian Context," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 1-18, Oct 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM67845

Full Article/Conclusion

First, the Altman Z’’-Score failed to provide any valuable early-warning signals to detect earnings management at DHFL in this case. The model put DHFL in the safety zone every year and classified it as having higher values compared to the control company, whereas the latter was moving closer to the grey zone. For a creditor, this model summarizes the reported values of the capital strength and liquidity, which looked good in the case of DHFL.   Second, the Beneish M-Score performed slightly better but still in the insufficient manner. In this case, both companies were distinguished by the test as expected – one year for DHFL and zero for LIC HF, but the signal was identified only in one out of three years and does not recur. Moreover, the M-Score is sensitive to non-recurring items and small balance sheet items like accounts receivable, which are not economically important for creditors.   Third, the two models contradict each other. In FY2017, the models gave different results. This fact proves the conclusions made in the case of Toshiba, that choosing a model determines the result.   Fourth, and possibly the most telling indicator of a problem, was the discrepancy and not a single score, namely, the balance sheet date on which there were very different receivable numbers in two years of annual reports. After all, any model screen is only as reliable as the consistency of the underlying numbers reported, and restatements need to be flagged as well as the scores. These findings are based on a single company-pair and from a lender’s perspective. This does not mean that the models don’t work in general, or that this research proves that they do.

References

  Altamn,E.I(1968). FINANCIAL RATIOS, DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS AND THE PREDICTION OF CORPORATE BANKRUPTCY - Altman - 1968 - The Journal of Finance - Wiley Online Library   Altman, E. I., Hartzell, J., & Peck, M. (1995). Emerging markets corporate bonds: A scoring system. Salomon Brothers, New York (the source of the Z''-Score variant used in Chapter 4). Reprinted in E. I. Altman & R. M. Levich (Eds.) Emerging Market Capital Flows (1998) Springer. Emerging market corporate bonds — a scoring system | Springer Nature Link   Beneish, M. D. (1999). The detection of earnings manipulation. Financial Analysts Journal, 55(5) 24–36.The Detection of Earnings Manipulation: Financial Analysts Journal: Vol 55, No 5 2.1     This study by Güler, S., Emgin, O. And Uçma T. From 2013 is titled "A manifest for ethics in emerging markets: The prediction of manipulation in Turkey by using Beneish’s model." . The study was published by MÖDAV. The Turkish Foundation, for Collaboration of Accounting Academicians. The study can be found in the journal archive.Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi Ana Sayfa 2.2    Nindito, M., Avianti, I., Koeswayo, P. S., & Tanzil N. D. (2019). Financial statement fraud: An investigation into its prevalence in cross sector industries, in Indonesia. Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, XIV, Winter, 4(66) 1180–1190. Journal record:https://www.ceeol.com/search/journal-detail?id=1011 2.3    Parikh, P. N. (2024). Checking stability and spotting fraud in chosen Indian pharmaceutical companies, with Altman Z-Score and Beneish M-Score models. International Journal of Social Science Humanity & Management Research, 3(6)Evaluating  Financial Stability and Fraud Detection in Selected Indian Pharmaceutical Companies Using Altman Z Score and Beneish M Score Models 2.4 Bhavani, G., & Amponsah, C. T. (2017). M-. Z-Score, for detection of accounting fraud. Accountancy. The Public Interest, 68–86. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318489930_M-Score_and_Z-Score_for_detection_of_Accounting_Fraud  2.5     Haryadi, A., Nurmalasari, R., & Yanti, H. B. (2026). Comparative analysis of the effectiveness of three models in detecting financial statement fraud. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 36(2), 385–398 https://ejournal1.unud.ac.id/index.php/akuntansi/article/view/3488

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

10/12/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

10

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...