Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM67845
Volume:
10 |
10 |
Oct 2026
Pages:
1-18
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Bachelor of Business Administration
Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation
Bachelor of Business Administration
Koneru Lakshmaiah Education Foundation
Continued financial statement fraud (FSF) is adversely impacting investor confidence and capital market stability worldwide. This research analyzes the suitability of the two most recognized models for detecting financial frauds in the form of Altman's Z-score model and Beneish's M-score model through a selective comparative case analysis of two Indian housing finance companies: the case company of Dewan Housing Finance Corporation Limited (DHFL), which is an identified case of financial manipulation being investigated by the Indian regulators since 2019, and its industry matched company of LIC Housing Finance Limited (LIC HF) that has no record of being investigated or involved in any accounting restatement. Audited standalone financial statements of the two companies have been analyzed on the basis of the four consecutive financial years from FY2015 to FY2018, i.e., the four consecutive financial years preceding the revelation of financial manipulations by DHFL. The study has estimated both the models' ratios and calculated their composite scores year wise and compared the trend of two companies. Both models have been well tested in advanced economies and, to some extent, in developing nations, but no prior study exists where these two models have been used together on a verified Indian housing finance company fraud case with direct comparisons made to its competitor firm on a year-to-year basis. It is the purpose of this research paper to fill this void, in addition to pointing out certain data quality issues in DHFL's FY2017 financial statements.
KEYWORDS
First, the Altman Z’’-Score failed to provide any valuable early-warning signals to detect earnings management at DHFL in this case. The model put DHFL in the safety zone every year and classified it as having higher values compared to the control company, whereas the latter was moving closer to the grey zone. For a creditor, this model summarizes the reported values of the capital strength and liquidity, which looked good in the case of DHFL. Second, the Beneish M-Score performed slightly better but still in the insufficient manner. In this case, both companies were distinguished by the test as expected – one year for DHFL and zero for LIC HF, but the signal was identified only in one out of three years and does not recur. Moreover, the M-Score is sensitive to non-recurring items and small balance sheet items like accounts receivable, which are not economically important for creditors. Third, the two models contradict each other. In FY2017, the models gave different results. This fact proves the conclusions made in the case of Toshiba, that choosing a model determines the result. Fourth, and possibly the most telling indicator of a problem, was the discrepancy and not a single score, namely, the balance sheet date on which there were very different receivable numbers in two years of annual reports. After all, any model screen is only as reliable as the consistency of the underlying numbers reported, and restatements need to be flagged as well as the scores. These findings are based on a single company-pair and from a lender’s perspective. This does not mean that the models don’t work in general, or that this research proves that they do.
Altamn,E.I(1968). FINANCIAL RATIOS, DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS AND THE PREDICTION OF CORPORATE BANKRUPTCY - Altman - 1968 - The Journal of Finance - Wiley Online Library Altman, E. I., Hartzell, J., & Peck, M. (1995). Emerging markets corporate bonds: A scoring system. Salomon Brothers, New York (the source of the Z''-Score variant used in Chapter 4). Reprinted in E. I. Altman & R. M. Levich (Eds.) Emerging Market Capital Flows (1998) Springer. Emerging market corporate bonds — a scoring system | Springer Nature Link Beneish, M. D. (1999). The detection of earnings manipulation. Financial Analysts Journal, 55(5) 24–36.The Detection of Earnings Manipulation: Financial Analysts Journal: Vol 55, No 5 2.1 This study by Güler, S., Emgin, O. And Uçma T. From 2013 is titled "A manifest for ethics in emerging markets: The prediction of manipulation in Turkey by using Beneish’s model." . The study was published by MÖDAV. The Turkish Foundation, for Collaboration of Accounting Academicians. The study can be found in the journal archive.Muhasebe Bilim Dünyası Dergisi Ana Sayfa 2.2 Nindito, M., Avianti, I., Koeswayo, P. S., & Tanzil N. D. (2019). Financial statement fraud: An investigation into its prevalence in cross sector industries, in Indonesia. Journal of Applied Economic Sciences, XIV, Winter, 4(66) 1180–1190. Journal record:https://www.ceeol.com/search/journal-detail?id=1011 2.3 Parikh, P. N. (2024). Checking stability and spotting fraud in chosen Indian pharmaceutical companies, with Altman Z-Score and Beneish M-Score models. International Journal of Social Science Humanity & Management Research, 3(6)Evaluating Financial Stability and Fraud Detection in Selected Indian Pharmaceutical Companies Using Altman Z Score and Beneish M Score Models 2.4 Bhavani, G., & Amponsah, C. T. (2017). M-. Z-Score, for detection of accounting fraud. Accountancy. The Public Interest, 68–86. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/318489930_M-Score_and_Z-Score_for_detection_of_Accounting_Fraud 2.5 Haryadi, A., Nurmalasari, R., & Yanti, H. B. (2026). Comparative analysis of the effectiveness of three models in detecting financial statement fraud. E-Jurnal Akuntansi, 36(2), 385–398 https://ejournal1.unud.ac.id/index.php/akuntansi/article/view/3488
Publication Date
10/12/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
10
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...