Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM63402
Volume:
10 |
5 |
May 2026
Pages:
1-3
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Department of CSE
Shri Rawatpura Sarkar University, Raipur (C.G.)
Assistant Professor Department of CSE
Shri Rawatpura Sarkar University, Raipur (C.G.)
Automatic image colorization has demonstrated impressive results on natural scene datasets, yet pre-trained models struggle with domain-specific imagery such as Indian cultural heritage—vibrant festivals, classical dance forms, temple architecture, and traditional art. This paper presents a transfer-learning pipeline that fine-tunes the Zhang et al. (ECCV 2016) colorization convolutional neural network on a curated seven-domain Indian cultural dataset comprising 1,233 images across architecture, art, culture, dance, festivals, music, and other categories. Training was conducted entirely on Google Colab’s free-tier T4 GPU using PyTorch with a two-stage fine-tuning strategy: early encoder layers were frozen to preserve low-level feature representations while deeper layers were adapted to Indian cultural colour palettes over 20 epochs. The fine-tuned model achieves an overall PSNR of 20.35dB and SSIM of 0.8587 on a held-out test set of 107 images, with music (22.91dB) and architecture (21.94dB) achieving the highest per-domain scores.The complete pipeline is described in reproducible detail to enable adoption by resource-constrained academic researchers.
KEYWORDS
This paper presented a fully reproducible pipeline for fine-tuning the Zhang et al. image colorization model on Indian cultural heritage im-agery, implemented entirely within Google Colab’s free T4GPU envi-ronment. A seven-domain dataset of 1,233 images was curated, split 80/10/10, and augmented for underrepresented categories. A two-stage fine-tuning strategy produced a model achieving an overall PSNR of 20.35dB and SSIM of 0.8587 on a 107-image test set. Music and architecture domains achieved the strongest results (22.91dB and 21.94dB respectively), while festival imagery proved most challenging (18.02dB) due to extreme palette diversity. The complete six-cell Colab workflow is described in sufficient detail for full reproducibility without dedicated GPU hardware, making this approach accessible to resource-constrained researchers in cultural heritage computing.
[1] Zhang, R., Isola, P., & Efros, A.A. (2016). Colorful Image Colorization. European Conference on Computer Vision (ECCV) 2016. https://arxiv.org/abs/1603.08511 [2] He, K., Zhang, X., Ren, S., & Sun, J. (2016). Deep Residual Learning for Image Recognition. CVPR2016. [3] Goodfellow, I., Bengio, Y., & Courville, A. (2016).Deep Learning. MIT Press. [4] Pedregosa, F., et al. (2011). Scikit-learn: Machine Learning in Python. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 12, 2825–2830. https://scikit-learn.org/ [5] Iizuka, S., Simo-Serra, E., & Ishikawa, H. (2016). Let there be color! Joint end-to-end learning of global and local image priors for automatic image colorization with simultaneous classification. ACM Transactions on Graphics (TOG), 35(4), 1–11. [6] Su, J., Chu, H., & Jia, J. (2020).Instance-aware Image Colorization. IEEE/CVF Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR) 2020. [7] Isola, P., Zhu, J.Y., Zhou, T., & Efros, A.A. (2017). Image-to-image translation with conditional adversarial networks.CVPR2017. [8] Loshchilov, I., & Hutter, F. (2017).SGDR: Stochastic Gradient Descent with Warm Restarts. ICLR2017. [9] Vitoria, P., Raad, L., & Ballester, C. (2020). ChromaGAN: Adversarial picture colorization with semantic class distribution. IEEE Winter Conference on Applications of Computer Vision (WACV) 2020. [10] Wang, Z., Bovik, A.C., Sheikh, H.R., & Simoncelli, E.P. (2004). Image quality assessment: from error visibility to structural similarity. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing, 13(4), 600–612.
Publication Date
5/18/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...