Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM66544
Volume:
10 |
8 |
Aug 2026
Pages:
1-11
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
FIRE TECHNOLOGY & SAFETY ENGINEERING
VIKRANT UNIVERSITY, GWALIOR
FIRE TECHNOLOGY & SAFETY ENGINEERING
VIKRANT UNIVERSITY, GWALIOR
Fire evacuation from high-rise buildings is a complex life-safety problem involving fire growth, smoke movement, occupant response, human movement, congestion, and the availability of safe egress routes. Conventional evacuation assessments based only on travel distance or simple hydraulic calculations may not adequately represent the interaction between fire conditions and occupant movement. This study presents a numerical framework for analyzing fire evacuation in a high-rise building using the Fire Dynamics Simulator (FDS) and Pathfinder. FDS is used to simulate fire development, smoke propagation, temperature distribution, visibility, and selected toxic-gas conditions, while Pathfinder is used to model occupant movement, route selection, congestion, travel time, and evacuation performance. The study considers a representative 20-storey high-rise building with two protected staircases and a representative population distributed over the occupied floors. Multiple fire scenarios are proposed, including a low-floor fire, a middle-floor fire, and a high-floor fire. The results framework evaluates pre-evacuation time, total evacuation time, stair congestion, visibility, tenability, and occupant exposure. An illustrative comparison demonstrates that evacuation performance is strongly influenced by fire location, smoke spread, stair availability, occupant distribution, and pre-evacuation delay. The combined FDS–Pathfinder approach provides a more comprehensive assessment than evacuation-only simulation because it enables the evacuation analysis to be interpreted against evolving fire and smoke conditions. The study concludes that high-rise fire safety should be assessed using performance-based evacuation analysis, protected and redundant egress routes, smoke-control measures, occupant preparedness, and scenario-based emergency planning.
KEYWORDS
This research presents a systematic framework for the fire evacuation analysis of high-rise buildings using Fire Dynamics Simulator and Pathfinder. FDS can be used to investigate fire development, smoke movement, temperature, visibility, and relevant fire-effluent conditions, whereas Pathfinder can be used to simulate occupant movement, route selection, congestion, and evacuation time. The principal advantage of the combined methodology is that it considers evacuation as a dynamic process occurring within a changing fire environment. An evacuation route cannot be considered safe solely because it is geometrically available; its suitability may change as smoke and heat propagate through the building. The analysis indicates that fire location, staircase availability, occupant population, pre-evacuation delay, route congestion, and smoke conditions are key factors affecting high-rise evacuation performance. The use of multiple protected evacuation routes and effective smoke-control measures can improve evacuation resilience. For academic and professional applications, the proposed methodology can support performance-based fire-safety design, emergency planning, evacuation strategy development, and identification of high-risk building areas. However, the illustrative results in this paper must be replaced with actual FDS and Pathfinder outputs before the work is presented as an empirical simulation study. Overall, FDS–Pathfinder integrated modelling provides a valuable computational framework for evaluating the interaction between fire development and human evacuation in high-rise buildings.
1. Thunderhead Engineering. Pathfinder Documentation: Emergency Preparedness and Fire Exposure Analysis. Thunderhead Engineering. 2. Thunderhead Engineering. Manually Coupling PyroSim (FDS) and Pathfinder to Respond to Smoke. Pathfinder 2026.1 Documentation. 3. Thunderhead Engineering. Fractional Effective Dose Integration with Evacuation Results. Pathfinder 2026.1 Documentation. 4. Thunderhead Engineering. Pathfinder User Manual. Thunderhead Engineering. 5. Pauls, J. L. Building Evacuation and Other Fire-Safety Measures: Some Research Results and Their Application to Building Design, Operation, and Regulation. National Research Council Canada. 6. Pauls, J. L. Evacuation and Other Fire Safety Measures in High-Rise Buildings. National Research Council Canada. 7. Pauls, J. L. Movement of People in Building Evacuations. National Research Council Canada. 8. Proulx, G. Evacuation Time and Movement in Apartment Buildings. National Research Council Canada. 9. Proulx, G. Critical Factors in High-Rise Evacuations. National Research Council Canada. 10. Proulx, G. High-Rise Office Egress: The Human Factors. National Research Council Canada.
Publication Date
8/5/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
8
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...