Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM66884
Volume:
10 |
8 |
Aug 2026
Pages:
1-10
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Commerce
Govt. College Kumarsain, Shimla, H.P.
This study examines the causal linkages among foreign direct investment (FDI), economic growth, exports, gross capital formation, and inflation in India over the period 1985-2025. Using annual secondary data obtained from the World Bank’s World Development Indicators, the study employs a Vector Autoregression (VAR) framework and Granger causality approach to investigate the short-run dynamic relationships among the selected macroeconomic variables. The Augmented Dickey-Fuller test confirms that all variables are integrated of order one, while the Johansen cointegration test indicates no significant long-run equilibrium relationship among them. Accordingly, a VAR model in first differences with one lag is estimated. The Granger causality results reveal three significant unidirectional relationships: GDP Granger-causes exports, gross capital formation Granger-causes exports, and gross capital formation Granger-causes inflation. However, no significant causal relationship is found between FDI and GDP, either in the direction of FDI to growth or growth to FDI. The diagnostic tests confirm that the VAR model is stable and free from residual serial correlation, although the residuals are not jointly normally distributed. Overall, the findings indicate that domestic economic growth and capital formation play a more prominent role in India's short-run export dynamics than FDI. The study highlights the importance of strengthening domestic productive capacity, investment, and export competitiveness while ensuring that investment policies remain consistent with macroeconomic and price stability.
KEYWORDS
The study examined the dynamic relationships among GDP, FDI, exports, gross capital formation, and inflation in India for the period 1985-2025 using a VAR and Granger causality framework. The results confirm that all variables are integrated of order one, while the Johansen test indicates no long-run cointegrating relationship. The analysis therefore focuses on short-run interactions among the variables. The Granger causality results identify three significant relationships: GDP → Exports, GCF → Exports, and GCF → Inflation. These findings suggest that economic growth and domestic capital formation are important determinants of short-run export performance, while capital formation also has implications for price movements. However, no significant causal relationship is found between FDI and GDP, indicating that FDI did not have a significant short-run predictive effect on economic growth during the study period. From a policy perspective, the findings emphasise the need to strengthen domestic investment and productive capacity to improve export performance. Greater investment in infrastructure, technology, transport, logistics, and productive sectors can enhance India's competitiveness in international markets. Since GCF is also associated with inflation, investment expansion should be supported by adequate supply-side capacity and appropriate macroeconomic management to minimise short-run price pressures. The absence of significant FDI-GDP causality also suggests that policy should focus not only on attracting larger volumes of FDI but also on improving its quality and domestic economic linkages. FDI that promotes technology transfer, employment, productivity, skill development, and integration with domestic firms is likely to provide greater developmental benefits. Overall, a coordinated approach combining economic growth, domestic capital formation, export promotion, quality FDI, and price stability can provide a stronger foundation for sustainable economic development in India.
1. Alam, W., Ikram, F., Kumar, P., Haseeb, M., & Ali, N. (2024). Asymmetric effects of foreign direct investment on economic growth: Fresh evidence from India using NARDL simulation. Millennial Asia, 15(3), 409–428. https://doi.org/10.1177/09763996221122205 2. Bal, D. P., Dash, D. P., &Subhasish, B. (2016). The effects of capital formation on economic growth in India: Evidence from ARDL-bound testing approach. Global Business Review, 17(6), 1388–1400. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150916660403 3. Bhasin, N., & Gupta, A. (2017). Macroeconomic impact of FDI inflows: An ARDL approach for the case of India. Transnational Corporations Review, 9(3), 150–168. https://doi.org/10.1080/19186444.2017.1362860 4. Borensztein, E., De Gregorio, J., & Lee, J.-W. (1998). How does foreign direct investment affect economic growth? Journal of International Economics, 45(1), 115–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(97)00033-0 5. Chakraborty, C., &Basu, P. (2002). Foreign direct investment and growth in India: A cointegration approach. Applied Economics, 34(9), 1061–1073. https://doi.org/10.1080/00036840110074079 6. Chakraborty, C., &Nunnenkamp, P. (2008). Economic reforms, FDI, and economic growth in India: A sector level analysis. World Development, 36(7), 1192–1212. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2007.06.014 7. Dash, R. K., & Sharma, C. (2011). FDI, trade, and growth dynamics: New evidence from the post-reform India. The International Trade Journal, 25(2), 233–266. https://doi.org/10.1080/08853908.2011.554787 8. Jana, S. S., Sahu, T. N., & Pandey, K. D. (2020). How far is FDI relevant to India's foreign trade growth? An empirical investigation. Journal of Economic Structures, 9, Article 30. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40008-020-00212-6 9. Kaur, S., Kumar, P., & Ansari, M. A. (2024). An analysis of Indian FDI inflows through an augmented gravity model: Exploring new insights. International Economics and Economic Policy, 21(2), 435–455. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10368-024-00594-z 10. Paul, B. P., & Das, A. (2012). Export-led growth in India and the role of liberalization. Margin: The Journal of Applied Economic Research, 6(1), 1–26.
Publication Date
8/21/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...