Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM66936

Fraud Detection in Digital Payment Systems using Machine Learning

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM66936

Volume:

10 |

8 |

Aug 2026

Pages:

1-3

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM66936

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

GV

Gnaneswari V

Department of Management Studies

Ballari Institute of Technology and Management

Download Author Certificate
DNK

Dr.R N Kulkarni

Department of computer science

Ballari Institute of Technology and Management

Download Co-Author Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

Digital payment platforms have become an essential part of everyday transactions, but their rapid expansion has also increased the number of fraudulent transactions, posing risks to both customers and financial institutions. This study develops a machine learning-based fraud detection system using a dataset of 7,500 digital payment transactions spanning UPI, cards, wallets, and net banking. After data preprocessing and exploratory analysis, the SMOTE technique is applied to correct class imbalance in the training data. Four algorithms - Logistic Regression, Decision Tree, Random Forest, and XGBoost - are trained and compared using Accuracy, Precision, Recall, F1-score, and ROC-AUC. While XGBoost achieved the highest accuracy (82.5%), Logistic Regression achieved the highest recall (30.6%), making it more effective at catching fraud despite its lower overall accuracy, and it was therefore selected as the preferred model. SHAP (SHapley Additive exPlanations) is used to interpret its predictions, identifying payment mode, account age, and prior failed attempts as the leading fraud indicators. The fraud probability is further converted into a 0-100 risk score with Low/Medium/High risk categories and a corresponding early warning alert, giving the system a practical, actionable output. The study shows that recall, rather than accuracy alone, should guide model selection in imbalanced fraud detection tasks, and it contributes a working risk-scoring framework for real-time digital payment monitoring.

KEYWORDS

Digital Payments Fraud Detection Machine Learning Risk Scoring SHAP SMOTE

Cite This Article

Gnaneswari V, Dr.R N Kulkarni, "Fraud Detection in Digital Payment Systems using Machine Learning," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 8, pp. 1-3, Aug 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM66936

Full Article/Conclusion

This study developed and compared four machine learning models for fraud detection in digital payment transactions. XGBoost achieved the highest accuracy, but Logistic Regression achieved the highest recall and was selected as the preferred model, showing that accuracy alone is not an adequate criterion for imbalanced fraud detection tasks - recall and the precision-recall balance matter more when the cost of missing fraud is high. SHAP analysis improved the interpretability of the selected model, and the resulting risk-scoring framework and early-warning alert system make the output directly usable in a real payment monitoring workflow. The low precision and ROC-AUC values obtained across all models indicate that the models are not yet ready for production use; this is attributable to the modest dataset size, its class imbalance, and the absence of richer behavioural or sequential features. Future work should explore larger and more diverse transaction datasets, behavioural and temporal features, and more advanced algorithms to build a reliable, real-time fraud detection system for digital payments.

References

1. Mahdi, M. D. H., Rezaul, K. M., Rahman, M. A.: Credit Fraud Detection in the Banking Sector in UK: A Focus on E-Business. Int. Conf. on Innovative Computing Technology (2010) 2. Al-Khatib, A. M.: Payment Fraud Detection Techniques. International Journal of Computer Applications (2012) 3. Franca Lima, R., Machado Pereira, A. C.: Feature Selection Approaches to Fraud Detection in E-Payment Systems. E-Commerce and Web Technologies (2015) 4. Roy, A., Sun, J., Mahoney, R., Alonzi, L., Adams, S., Beling, P.: Deep Learning Detecting Fraud in Credit Card Transactions. Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (2018) 5. Diadiushkin, A., Sandkuhl, K., Maiatin, A.: Fraud Detection in Instant Payments as Contribution to Digitalization in Banks. Int. Conf. on Business Informatics Research (2019) 6. Victoria Priscilla, C., Padma Prabha, D.: Influence of Optimizing XGBoost to Handle Class Imbalance in Credit Card Fraud Detection. Int. Conf. on Smart Electronics and Communication (2020) 7. Muhal, H., et al.: An Ensemble Approach for Credit Card Fraud Detection Using Champion-Challenger Analysis. Int. Conf. on Machine Learning and Data Engineering (2022) 8. Jain, N., Chaudhary, A., Kumar, A.: Credit Card Fraud Detection Using Machine Learning Techniques. Int. Conf. on Computing, Communication, and Intelligent Systems (2022) 9. Lande, J., Sharma, J.: Optimizing Logistic Regression for Fraud Detection in Digital Payments. International Journal of Computer Science and Engineering (2025) 10. Ebenezer, Mohan, S., Subalya, S., Jansi Rani, T.: AI-Powered Fraud Detection Framework for UPI and Digital Wallet Transactions Using Bi-LSTM with Attention. Int. Conf. on Artificial Intelligence and Smart Systems (2025) 11. Reserve Bank of India: Authentication Mechanisms for Digital Payment Transactions Directions, 2025. RBI (2025)  

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

8/25/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

1

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

3

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...