Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM62251
Volume:
10 |
4 |
April 2026
Pages:
1-8
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Computer Science and Engineering
Christ College of Engineering and Technology
Computer Science and Engineering
Christ College of Engineering and Technology
Computer Science and Engineering
Christ College of Engineering and Technology
Computer Science and Engineering
Christ College of Engineering and Technology
Financial fraud detection has become an essential component of modern digital banking systems due to the rapid growth of online and real-time transactions. Traditional rule-based fraud detection methods are limited in handling evolving fraud patterns and large-scale transaction data. Recent studies highlight the effectiveness of machine learning techniques in identifying fraudulent activities by learning hidden behavioural patterns from transaction records, even with limited labelled data. Real-time fraud detection frameworks, such as graph-based models, enable continuous monitoring of transaction networks and fast identification of suspicious behaviour with minimal delay. In addition, blockchain-integrated fraud detection systems enhance transaction security by ensuring data integrity, transparency, and resistance to tampering. Experimental results from existing research demonstrate that AI-driven and real-time fraud detection systems achieve high accuracy, scalability, and adaptability, making them suitable for deployment in modern banking environments.
KEYWORDS
The study reviewed and analysed various artificial intelligence–based fraud detection frameworks and their applicability in developing a real-time financial fraud detection system. The discussion covered traditional rule-based methods, machine learning and deep learning models, graph-based real-time detection frameworks, and reinforcement learning–enhanced adaptive systems. From the review, it is evident that AI has transformed fraud detection by enabling models to automatically learn behavioural and transactional patterns with minimal human intervention. Among the analysed approaches, machine learning and deep learning models demonstrated high accuracy in identifying fraudulent transactions, making them suitable for large-scale banking and digital payment systems. Real-time graph-based frameworks such as Spade+ showed exceptional efficiency in detecting coordinated and evolving fraud activities by dynamically analysing transaction networks. In addition, blockchain-based frameworks such as SRC-FD highlighted the importance of transaction immutability, transparency, and trust, particularly in cryptocurrency and decentralized financial systems. Reinforcement learning–based adaptive strategies further enhance fraud detection by continuously optimizing decision policies based on real-time feedback, reducing false positives and improving long-term system performance. The integration of these techniques results in a robust hybrid fraud detection framework that balances detection accuracy, adaptability, security, and computational efficiency—essential requirements for modern financial environments. The reviewed literature collectively supports the effectiveness of combining machine learning intelligence, real-time graph analytics, reinforcement learning, and blockchain technology to develop an intelligent, secure, and scalable financial fraud detection system capable of responding to emerging threats autonomously. In addition to accuracy and adaptability, the reviewed studies emphasize the importance of scalability and low-latency processing in fraud detection systems. As financial institutions handle millions of transactions in real time, detection frameworks must efficiently process high-volume data streams without performance degradation. Graph-based approaches such as Spade+ address this requirement by enabling continuous monitoring of dynamic transaction networks and rapid identification of suspicious substructures. These systems significantly reduce detection delays and financial losses by identifying fraud patterns at an early stage, making them well suited for deployment in real-world banking and digital payment environments
[1] K. H. Choi and J. E. Ha, “Object Detection Method Using Image and Number of Objects on Image as Label,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 58932–58945, 2024. [2] A. B. Amjoud and M. Amrouch, “Object Detection Using Deep Learning, CNNs and Vision Transformers:A Review,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 110234–110259, 2023. [3] K. Elgazzar, H. H. AlHakami, A. A. Alsabei, and M. A. Alharbi, “Quantitative Analysis of Deep Learning-Based Object Detection Models,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 92567–92581, 2024. [4] L. Jiao, F. Zhang, L. Liu, S. Yang, Z. Feng, and X. Cao, “New Generation Deep Learning for Video Object Detection: A Survey,” IEEE Access, vol. 10, pp. 54126–54147, 2022. [5] I. Ševo and A. Avramović,“Convolutional Neural Network Based Automatic Object Detection on Aerial Images,” IEEE Geoscience and Remote Sensing Letters, vol. 13, no. 5, pp. 740–744, May 2016. [6] A. A. Alsabei, T. M. Alsubait, and H. H. Alhakami,“Enhancing Crowd Safety at Hajj: Real-Time Detection of Abnormal Behavior Using YOLOv9,” IEEE Access, vol. 13, pp. 108932–108944, 2025. [7] J. Redmon, S. Divvala, R. Girshick, and A. Farhadi,“You Only Look Once: Unified, Real-Time Object Detection,”in Proc. IEEE Conf. on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition (CVPR), pp. 779–788, 2016. [8] W. Liu, D. Anguelov, D. Erhan, C. Szegedy, S. Reed, C.-Y. Fu, and A. C. Berg, “SSD: Single Shot MultiBox Detector,”in Proc. European Conf. on Computer Vision (ECCV), pp. 21–37, 2016. [9] K. He, G. Gkioxari, P. Dollár, and R. Girshick,“Mask R-CNN,”in Proc. IEEE Int. Conf. on Computer Vision (ICCV), pp. 2980–2988, 2017. [10] A. Dosovitskiy et al., “An Image Is Worth 16×16 Words: Transformers for Image Recognition at Scale,”arXiv:2010.11929, 2020.
Publication Date
5/3/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
4
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...