Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM.ISTCESD025
Volume:
10 |
9 |
Sep 2026
Pages:
1-14
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Department of Zoology,
Aadarsh college Hingoli, (MS) India
Department of Zoology,
Aadarsh college Hingoli, (MS) India
Department of Zoology,
Aadarsh college Hingoli, (MS) India
Freshwater benthic communities constitute an essential biological component of rivers, streams, lakes, reservoirs, wetlands and irrigation systems. In Maharashtra, a large network of river basins and artificial water bodies creates a wide range of sedimentary and substrate-associated habitats, yet the biodiversity and ecological functioning of their meiobenthic and benthic macroinvertebrate communities remain incompletely documented. This review synthesizes available evidence on freshwater meiobenthos and benthic macroinvertebrates with particular emphasis on Maharashtra and, where state-level evidence is sparse, uses relevant Indian studies to place Maharashtra observations in a broader context. Meiobenthos occupy the interstitial sediment environment and include nematodes, rotifers, gastrotrichs, harpacticoid copepods, ostracods, tardigrades and other small metazoans. Benthic macroinvertebrates include aquatic insects, molluscs, annelids and crustaceans. Together, these communities contribute to organic-matter decomposition, nutrient regeneration, sediment bioturbation, microbial regulation and trophic transfer to fishes and other consumers. Their community structure responds to sediment grain size, organic matter, dissolved oxygen, current velocity, water temperature, nutrients, aquatic vegetation and anthropogenic disturbance. Maharashtra studies from western districts, the Godavari basin, Wainganga-associated systems, Chandrapur and Yavatmal demonstrate substantial local diversity, but also reveal strong geographic and taxonomic gaps. Recent work elsewhere in India confirms that macroinvertebrate-based assessment can complement physicochemical monitoring, while international freshwater biomonitoring literature stresses the need for harmonized sampling and taxonomic protocols. The review identifies pollution, eutrophication, sedimentation, flow regulation, habitat alteration, agricultural runoff, urbanization and climate-related hydrological changes as major pressures. It concludes that Maharashtra requires a standardized, basin-wide and long-term benthic biodiversity programme integrating conventional taxonomy, functional traits, physicochemical measurements, sediment quality, DNA-based methods and spatial analysis. Such a framework would strengthen freshwater conservation, ecological restoration, fisheries management and evidence-based water-quality assessment.
KEYWORDS
Freshwater meiobenthos and benthic macroinvertebrates are integral components of Maharashtra's aquatic ecosystems, yet their biodiversity remains incompletely documented. Existing studies demonstrate that rivers, reservoirs, lakes and smaller freshwater bodies support diverse assemblages of aquatic insects, molluscs, annelids, crustaceans and microscopic sediment-dwelling organisms. Maharashtra-specific evidence is strongest for macroinvertebrates, while freshwater meiofaunal research remains a major frontier. The ecological importance of these organisms extends from decomposition and nutrient cycling to food-web support and biological assessment. Their sensitivity to oxygen conditions, sediment characteristics, organic enrichment, nutrient loading and habitat disturbance makes them valuable indicators when interpreted within a standardized regional framework. The future of freshwater benthic research in Maharashtra should therefore move from isolated site inventories towards coordinated basin-scale monitoring that integrates taxonomy, functional ecology, sediment science, physicochemical measurements, molecular tools and spatial analysis. Such an approach would strengthen biodiversity documentation and provide a scientific basis for pollution control, river restoration, reservoir management and sustainable fisheries conservation.
APHA, AWWA, & WEF. (2017). Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater (23rd ed.). American Public Health Association. Armitage, P. D., Moss, D., Wright, J. F., & Furse, M. T. (1983). The performance of a new biological water quality score system based on macroinvertebrates over a wide range of unpolluted running-water sites. Water Research, 17, 333–347. Balsamo, M., Semprucci, F., & Todaro, M. A. (2022). Meiofauna in a changing world. Ecological Indicators, 138, 108769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2022.108769 Barbour, M. T., Gerritsen, J., Snyder, B. D., & Stribling, J. B. (1999). Rapid bioassessment protocols for use in streams and wadeable rivers: Periphyton, benthic macroinvertebrates and fish (2nd ed.). U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Bhatt, J. P., & Pandit, M. K. (2010). Population ecology of benthic macroinvertebrates in a Himalayan river system. Bonada, N., Prat, N., Resh, V. H., & Statzner, B. (2006). Developments in aquatic insect biomonitoring: A comparative analysis of recent approaches. Annual Review of Entomology, 51, 495–523. Cantonati, M., et al. (2024). Towards harmonized standards for freshwater biodiversity monitoring and biological assessment using benthic macroinvertebrates. Science of the Total Environment, 918, 170360. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2024.170360 Chakraborty, S., et al. (2023). Spatio-temporal variability in macroinvertebrate community structure and ecological health status of a tropical dynamic river-estuarine system, India: An integrated approach of multivariate analysis. Environmental Research. Clarke, R. T., Wright, J. F., & Furse, M. T. (2003). RIVPACS models for predicting the expected macroinvertebrate fauna and assessing river quality.
Publication Date
9/28/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
1
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...