Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM67696
Volume:
10 |
10 |
Oct 2026
Pages:
1-11
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Commerce
Nirwan University, Jaipur
Commerce
Nirwan University, Jaipur
India has moved from being one of the most cash-dependent large economies in the world to hosting the world's largest real-time retail payment system. In 2025–26 the Unified Payments Interface (UPI) processed 24,161.69 crore transactions worth about ₹314 lakh crore, roughly 66 crore payments every day. This paper asks a simple but important economic question: when the way households pay changes, does what they buy, how much they save, and how they borrow also change? Using official secondary data from the National Payments Corporation of India, the Reserve Bank of India, the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, and the World Bank's Global Findex 2025, the study builds a descriptive-analytical picture of the cash-to-cashless transition and reads it against established economic theory. Three findings stand out. First, payments have become dramatically smaller and more frequent: the average value of a UPI transaction fell about 29 per cent, from roughly ₹1,838 in 2020–21 to about ₹1,300 in 2025–26, even as volume grew at more than 100 per cent a year over eight years. Second, this granular, low-friction payment habit coincides with a visible shift in household balance sheets household debt rose from 36.7 per cent of GDP in 2021–22 to 45.5 per cent by September 2025, with non-housing consumption loans forming 58.4 per cent of household borrowing, while net financial saving has stayed below its pre-pandemic level. Third, the welfare effect is not uniform: causal evidence shows digital payments raise spending for ordinary consumers but raise saving for very poor households receiving transfers. The paper concludes that digital payments are best understood as a friction-removing technology whose consumption effect is genuinely ambiguous, and argues for digital financial literacy, in-app spending nudges, and stronger consumer protection alongside continued expansion.
KEYWORDS
The transition of cash to cashless is one of the most influential changes in payment behaviour ever witnessed by India. In this paper, we conceive of it as a way of removing two frictions in one shot: both the physical friction of releasing coins, and the psychological friction of making a payment. It's a no-brainer that removing the first is good. But removing the second is not; that friction was doing useful and quiet work as a self-control device. The Indian data are in line with that reading. This has resulted in payments increasing significantly in volume and dropping substantially in value, with the average value of UPI transacting dropping around 29 per cent from its peak in 2020-21 to around ₹1,300 in 2025-26. There has been an increase in consumption and a shift toward non-food, discretionary items. The ratio of household debt to GDP now stands at 45.5 per cent, with numbers of household-dwelling units holding consumption loans making up the bulk and the net financial saving by this sector falling short of the pre-pandemic level. Causal evidence for India reveals the spending effect of cash dependence, which increases by 2.38 per cent per 10 percentage points of cash dependence, due to the erosion of endowment effect and not as a result of income or credit shocks. That digital payments are bad is the wrong conclusion. They have increased access, reduced costs, formalized transactions and connected hundreds of millions of people who were not served previously, in fact, for the poorest families, the international evidence indicates savings on their part, rather than spending. The takeaway: a payments system this seamless creep can alter the way that households make financial choices, and thus public policy should adjust accordingly. The challenge of the coming decade will not be to delay transition, but rather to establish the financial education, behavioural controls and consumer safeguards to help households reap the benefits of transition, while maintaining control of their finances.
· Agarwal, S., Ghosh, P., Li, J., & Ruan, T. (2024). Digital payments and consumption: Evidence from the 2016 demonetization in India. The Review of Financial Studies, 37(8), 2550–2585. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhae005 · Aggarwal, K., Malik, S., Mishra, D. K., & Paul, D. (2021). Moving from cash to cashless economy: Toward digital India. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(4), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no4.0043 · Bachas, P., Gertler, P., Higgins, S., & Seira, E. (2021). How debit cards enable the poor to save more. The Journal of Finance, 76(4), 1913–1957. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.13021 · Baumol, W. J. (1952). The transactions demand for cash: An inventory theoretic approach. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 66(4), 545–556. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882104 · Crouzet, N., Gupta, A., & Mezzanotti, F. (2023). Shocks and technology adoption: Evidence from electronic payment systems. Journal of Political Economy, 131(11), 3003–3065. https://doi.org/10.1086/724847 · Demirgüç-Kunt, A., Klapper, L., Singer, D., & Ansar, S. (2025). The Global Findex Database 2025: Connectivity and financial inclusion in the digital economy. World Bank. https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/globalfindex · Friedman, M. (1957). A theory of the consumption function. Princeton University Press. https://www.nber.org/books-and-chapters/theory-consumption-function · Higgins, S. (2024). Financial technology adoption: Network externalities of cashless payments in Mexico. American Economic Review, 114(11), 3469–3512. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20201952 · Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation. (2024). Household Consumption Expenditure Survey: 2023-24 Fact sheet. Government of India. https://www.mospi.gov.in/sites/default/files/publication_reports/HCES%20FactSheet%202023-24.pdf · Prelec, D., & Loewenstein, G. (1998). The red and the black: Mental accounting of savings and debt. Marketing Science, 17(1), 4–28. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.17.1.4
Publication Date
10/7/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
7
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...