Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM67696

FROM CASH TO CASHLESS: ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF DIGITAL PAYMENT USAGE ON HOUSEHOLD CONSUMPTION BEHAVIOUR AND FINANCIAL DECISION-MAKING IN INDIA

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM67696

Volume:

10 |

10 |

Oct 2026

Pages:

1-11

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM67696

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

SR

Suchika Rathore

Commerce

Nirwan University, Jaipur

Download Author Certificate
DNL

Dr Neelu Lamba

Commerce

Nirwan University, Jaipur

Download Co-Author Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

India has moved from being one of the most cash-dependent large economies in the world to hosting the world's largest real-time retail payment system. In 2025–26 the Unified Payments Interface (UPI) processed 24,161.69 crore transactions worth about ₹314 lakh crore, roughly 66 crore payments every day. This paper asks a simple but important economic question: when the way households pay changes, does what they buy, how much they save, and how they borrow also change? Using official secondary data from the National Payments Corporation of India, the Reserve Bank of India, the Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation, and the World Bank's Global Findex 2025, the study builds a descriptive-analytical picture of the cash-to-cashless transition and reads it against established economic theory. Three findings stand out. First, payments have become dramatically smaller and more frequent: the average value of a UPI transaction fell about 29 per cent, from roughly ₹1,838 in 2020–21 to about ₹1,300 in 2025–26, even as volume grew at more than 100 per cent a year over eight years. Second, this granular, low-friction payment habit coincides with a visible shift in household balance sheets household debt rose from 36.7 per cent of GDP in 2021–22 to 45.5 per cent by September 2025, with non-housing consumption loans forming 58.4 per cent of household borrowing, while net financial saving has stayed below its pre-pandemic level. Third, the welfare effect is not uniform: causal evidence shows digital payments raise spending for ordinary consumers but raise saving for very poor households receiving transfers. The paper concludes that digital payments are best understood as a friction-removing technology whose consumption effect is genuinely ambiguous, and argues for digital financial literacy, in-app spending nudges, and stronger consumer protection alongside continued expansion.

KEYWORDS

digital payments; Unified Payments Interface; household consumption; behavioural economics; India

Cite This Article

Suchika Rathore, Dr Neelu Lamba, "FROM CASH TO CASHLESS: ASSESSING THE IMPACT OF DIGITAL PAYMENT USAGE ON HOUSEHOLD CONSUMPTION BEHAVIOUR AND FINANCIAL DECISION-MAKING IN INDIA," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 1-11, Oct 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM67696

Full Article/Conclusion

The transition of cash to cashless is one of the most influential changes in payment behaviour ever witnessed by India. In this paper, we conceive of it as a way of removing two frictions in one shot: both the physical friction of releasing coins, and the psychological friction of making a payment. It's a no-brainer that removing the first is good. But removing the second is not; that friction was doing useful and quiet work as a self-control device. The Indian data are in line with that reading. This has resulted in payments increasing significantly in volume and dropping substantially in value, with the average value of UPI transacting dropping around 29 per cent from its peak in 2020-21 to around ₹1,300 in 2025-26. There has been an increase in consumption   and a shift toward non-food, discretionary items. The ratio of household debt to GDP now stands at 45.5 per cent, with numbers of household-dwelling units holding consumption loans making up the bulk and the net financial saving by this sector falling short of the pre-pandemic level. Causal evidence for India reveals the spending effect of cash dependence, which increases by 2.38 per cent per 10 percentage points of cash dependence, due to the erosion of endowment effect and not as a result of income or credit shocks. That digital payments are bad is the wrong conclusion. They have increased access, reduced costs, formalized transactions and connected hundreds of millions of people who were not served previously, in fact, for the poorest families, the international evidence indicates savings on their part, rather than spending. The takeaway: a payments system this seamless creep can alter the way that households make financial choices, and thus public policy should adjust accordingly. The challenge of the coming decade will not be to delay transition, but rather to establish the financial education, behavioural controls and consumer safeguards to help households reap the benefits of transition, while maintaining control of their finances.

References

·                  Agarwal, S., Ghosh, P., Li, J., & Ruan, T. (2024). Digital payments and consumption: Evidence from the 2016 demonetization in India. The Review of Financial Studies, 37(8), 2550–2585. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhae005 ·                  Aggarwal, K., Malik, S., Mishra, D. K., & Paul, D. (2021). Moving from cash to cashless economy: Toward digital India. Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(4), 43–54. https://doi.org/10.13106/jafeb.2021.vol8.no4.0043 ·                  Bachas, P., Gertler, P., Higgins, S., & Seira, E. (2021). How debit cards enable the poor to save more. The Journal of Finance, 76(4), 1913–1957. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.13021 ·                  Baumol, W. J. (1952). The transactions demand for cash: An inventory theoretic approach. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 66(4), 545–556. https://doi.org/10.2307/1882104 ·                  Crouzet, N., Gupta, A., & Mezzanotti, F. (2023). Shocks and technology adoption: Evidence from electronic payment systems. Journal of Political Economy, 131(11), 3003–3065. https://doi.org/10.1086/724847 ·                  Demirgüç-Kunt, A., Klapper, L., Singer, D., & Ansar, S. (2025). The Global Findex Database 2025: Connectivity and financial inclusion in the digital economy. World Bank. https://www.worldbank.org/en/publication/globalfindex ·                  Friedman, M. (1957). A theory of the consumption function. Princeton University Press. https://www.nber.org/books-and-chapters/theory-consumption-function ·                  Higgins, S. (2024). Financial technology adoption: Network externalities of cashless payments in Mexico. American Economic Review, 114(11), 3469–3512. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.20201952 ·                  Ministry of Statistics and Programme Implementation. (2024). Household Consumption Expenditure Survey: 2023-24 Fact sheet. Government of India. https://www.mospi.gov.in/sites/default/files/publication_reports/HCES%20FactSheet%202023-24.pdf ·                  Prelec, D., & Loewenstein, G. (1998). The red and the black: Mental accounting of savings and debt. Marketing Science, 17(1), 4–28. https://doi.org/10.1287/mksc.17.1.4

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

10/7/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

7

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...