From Commands to Conversation: The Transformative Role of AI-Powered Language Technologies in Human–Computer Interaction

AI-driven natural language processing is reshaping HCI by moving interaction from predefined commands toward flexible, goal-oriented conversation. Transformer-based models and instruction-tuned LLMs have made it possible for users to query, instruct, revise, and collaborate with systems through ordinary language across an unprecedented range of tasks. The resulting interfaces can lower learning barriers, support personalization, expand accessibility, and increase the expressive power of human–computer interaction. The same qualities that make conversational AI attractive also create new risks. Fluent language can mask uncertainty, encourage overtrust, amplify bias, and make system failures harder to detect. Empirical HCI research shows that user experience depends not only on linguistic quality but on accuracy, context, timing, expertise, transparency, privacy, and the availability of correction mechanisms. The most productive direction for future HCI is therefore not to make computers merely sound more human. It is to combine natural language with clear system state, evidence, user control, inclusive design, and continuous evaluation. In that form, AI-driven NLP can become a powerful interface layer that supports rather than displaces human judgment.

[1] Amershi, S., Weld, D., Vorvoreanu, M., Fourney, A., Nushi, B., Collisson, P., Suh, J., Iqbal, S., Bennett, P. N., Inkpen, K., Teevan, J., Kikin-Gil, R., & Horvitz, E. (2019). Guidelines for human–AI interaction. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300233 [2] Bender, E. M., Gebru, T., McMillan-Major, A., & Shmitchell, S. (2021). On the dangers of stochastic parrots: Can language models be too big? Proceedings of the 2021 ACM Conference on Fairness, Accountability, and Transparency, 610–623. https://doi.org/10.1145/3442188.3445922 [3] Borsci, S., Malizia, A., Schmettow, M., van der Velde, F., Tariverdiyeva, G., Balaji, D., & Chamberlain, A. (2022). The Chatbot Usability Scale: The design and pilot of a usability scale for interaction with AI-based conversational agents. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 26(1), 95–119. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-021-01582-9 [4] Borsci, S., Schmettow, M., Malizia, A., Chamberlain, A., & van der Velde, F. (2023). A confirmatory factorial analysis of the Chatbot Usability Scale: A multilanguage validation. Personal and Ubiquitous Computing, 27(2), 317–330. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00779-022-01690-0 [5] Brown, T. B., Mann, B., Ryder, N., Subbiah, M., Kaplan, J. D., Dhariwal, P., Neelakantan, A., Shyam, P., Sastry, G., Askell, A., Agarwal, S., Herbert-Voss, A., Krueger, G., Henighan, T., Child, R., Ramesh, A., Ziegler, D. M., Wu, J., Winter, C., ... Amodei, D. (2020). Language models are few-shot learners. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 33, 1877–1901. [6] Chiesurin, S., Dimakopoulos, D., Sobrevilla Cabezudo, M. A., Eshghi, A., Papaioannou, I., Rieser, V., & Konstas, I. (2023). The dangers of trusting stochastic parrots: Faithfulness and trust in open-domain conversational question answering. Findings of the Association for Computational Linguistics: ACL 2023, 947–959. [7] Clark, L., Pantidi, N., Cooney, O., Doyle, P. R., Garaialde, D., Edwards, J., Spillane, B., Gilmartin, E., Murad, C., Munteanu, C., Wade, V., & Cowan, B. R. (2019). What makes a good conversation? Challenges in designing truly conversational agents. Proceedings of the 2019 CHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Article 475. https://doi.org/10.1145/3290605.3300705 [8] Devlin, J., Chang, M.-W., Lee, K., & Toutanova, K. (2019). BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding. Proceedings of NAACL-HLT 2019, 4171–4186. https://doi.org/10.18653/v1/N19-1423 [9] Følstad, A., Nordheim, C. B., & Bjørkli, C. A. (2018). What makes users trust a chatbot for customer service? An exploratory interview study. In S. S. Bodrunova (Ed.), Internet Science (LNCS 11193, pp. 194–208). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-01437-7_16 [10] Fossa, F., & Sucameli, I. (2022). Gender bias and conversational agents: An ethical perspective on social robotics. Science and Engineering Ethics, 28, 23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11948-022-00376-3