Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM.IBFE185
Volume:
|
|
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Gentle parenting, characterized by empathy, emotional validation, and open communication, has gained significant attention as a progressive child-rearing approach in recent years. However, in contemporary society, its consistent practice appears to be gradually declining, with many parents reverting to more traditional, discipline-oriented methods of upbringing. This paper aims to analyze the fading practice of gentle parenting by comparing it with conventional parenting styles that emphasize authority, obedience, and behavioral control. The study explores socio-cultural, economic, and psychological factors influencing parental choices, including time constraints, work-life imbalance, societal expectations, and perceived effectiveness of discipline-based methods. Using secondary data and observational insights, the research examines the impact of both approaches on child behavior, emotional development, and parent–child relationships. The paper further discusses the challenges faced by parents in sustaining dialogue-based parenting in fast-paced modern lifestyles. The findings suggest that while gentle parenting promotes emotional intelligence and secure attachment, practical limitations and lack of awareness contribute to its reduced application. The study concludes by emphasizing the need for balanced parenting approaches that integrate emotional responsiveness with appropriate discipline.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
1/28/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
4
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...