Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM67004
Volume:
10 |
8 |
Aug 2026
Pages:
1-14
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Department of Computer Networking
PSG POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE
Department of Computer Networking
PSG POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE
Department of Computer Networking
PSG POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE
Department of Computer Networking
PSG POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE
Department of Computer Networking
PSG POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE
Department of Computer Networking
PSG POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE
Department of Computer Networking
PSG POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE
Department of Computer Networking
PSG POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE
Department of Computer Networking
PSG POLYTECHNIC COLLEGE
The rapid advancement of digital technologies in education has intensified the need for intelligent systems that not only assist students in planning their studies but also support sustained engagement, consistency, and progress monitoring. A major challenge faced by many learners, including motivated and hardworking students, is the inability to translate effort into measurable academic outcomes due to ineffective study scheduling, lack of continuous feedback, and declining motivation over time. To address this challenge, this paper proposes an AI-based intelligent study routine management system that integrates personalized scheduling, progress tracking, motivational support, and predictive analytics within a unified framework. The proposed system dynamically generates individualized daily and weekly study routines by analyzing academic performance, subject difficulty, available study time, and examination schedules. In addition to routine generation, the system continuously monitors study execution, captures behavioral feedback, and adapts learning strategies to maintain balance and consistency. Machine learning models are employed to identify subject priorities and forecast academic performance trends, enabling early identification of potential learning risks. A motivation support module reinforces discipline through adaptive reminders, progress summaries, and habit-building mechanisms, while a visual analytics dashboard provides transparent insights into learning progress and engagement patterns. Experimental evaluation using simulated learner data indicates improvements in study consistency, subject prioritization, and predicted academic outcomes. By combining planning, monitoring, motivation, and adaptive intelligence, the proposed system addresses critical gaps in existing study planners and learning platforms. The paper further discusses implementation considerations, system limitations, and future enhancements aimed at scalable deployment in modern educational environments.
KEYWORDS
This paper presented the design, methodology, and prototype implementation of an AI-based intelligent study routine management system that integrates personalized scheduling, motivational support, progress monitoring, and academic performance prediction within a unified framework. Unlike conventional study planners or isolated learning analytics tools, the proposed system adopts a holistic approach that continuously adapts study routines based on learner performance, behavioural feedback, and engagement patterns. By embedding data-driven intelligence into daily academic planning, the system directly addresses long-standing challenges related to time management, inconsistent study habits, and declining learner motivation.The proposed architecture demonstrates how artificial intelligence can be effectively leveraged to support self-regulated learning. Through adaptive scheduling mechanisms, learners receive structured yet flexible study plans tailored to their individual needs and constraints. The inclusion of motivational reinforcement and transparent progress visualization further enhances learner engagement and consistency, while predictive analytics provide early indicators of academic risk and guide timely intervention. Experimental evaluations using simulated learner profiles indicate substantial improvements in schedule adherence, study consistency, and predicted academic outcomes, validating the practical value of the integrated approach. Beyond individual learners, the system offers meaningful benefits to educators and institutions by enabling data-informed monitoring of academic progress and early identification of students who may require additional support. The modular and scalable design of the platform allows it to be extended across diverse educational contexts, including formal education, online learning environments, and professional training programs. While challenges such as data privacy, long-term engagement sustainability, and large-scale validation remain important considerations, the system’s architecture is designed to accommodate continuous refinement and responsible deployment. In conclusion, this work demonstrates that artificial intelligence can play a transformative role in academic support systems when applied beyond automation and content delivery. By combining intelligent scheduling with motivational guidance, behavioural awareness, and predictive insight, the proposed system contributes a practical and research-driven solution for enhancing learning effectiveness and student well-being. The findings reinforce the potential of AI-enabled study management tools to foster disciplined, motivated, and resilient learners in increasingly complex educational landscapes.
[1] R. Luckin, W. Holmes, M. Griffiths, and L. Forcier, Intelligence Unleashed: An Argument for AI in Education. London, U.K.: Pearson, 2016. [2] B. P. Woolf, Intelligent Interactive Tutors: Student-Centered Strategies for Revolutionizing E-Learning. San Francisco, CA, USA: Morgan Kaufmann, 2010. [3] R. S. Baker and P. S. Inventado, “Educational data mining and learning analytics,” in Learning Analytics, New York, NY, USA: Springer, 2014, pp. 61–75. [4] UNESCO, AI and Education: Guidance for Policy Makers. Paris, France: UNESCO Publishing, 2022. [5] M. Chassignol, A. Khoroshavin, A. Klimova, and A. Bilyatdinova, “Artificial intelligence trends in education: A narrative overview,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 136, pp. 16–24, 2018. [6] S. H. Selvaraj and R. Venkatesan, “AI-driven adaptive learning models for higher education,” in Proc. IEEE EDUCON, 2021, pp. 145–152. [7] D. P. Kingma and M. Welling, “Auto-encoding variational Bayes,” arXiv preprint, arXiv:1312.6114, 2013. [8] J. E. Beck and K. Chang, “Identifying students at risk using machine learning predictions,” User Modeling and User-Adapted Interaction, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 85–105, 2012. [9] K. Eves and J. Valasek, “Adaptive control for singularly perturbed systems,” Code Ocean Repository, Aug. 2023. [10] Y. Yorozu, M. Hirano, K. Oka, and Y. Tagawa, “Electron spectroscopy studies on magneto-optical media,” IEEE Transl. J. Magn. Japan, vol. 2, pp. 740–741, Aug. 1987. [11] T. L. Nguyen and H. M. Jeong, “Adaptive e-learning systems using deep learning,” IEEE Access, vol. 8, pp. 181534–181545, 2020. [12] J. K. Tarus, Z. Niu, and A. Yousif, “A hybrid knowledge-based recommender system for e-learning,” Applied Intelligence, vol. 48, pp. 1707–1722, 2018. [13] S. Kumar and S. Garg, “Personalized learning using reinforcement learning,” in Proc. IEEE ICCCA, 2021. [14] K. Verbert et al., “Learning dashboards: An overview,” IEEE Trans. Learning Technologies, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 124–135, 2014. [15] P. Brusilovsky and E. Millán, “User models for adaptive hypermedia,” in The Adaptive Web, Berlin, Germany: Springer, 2007. [16] D. Ifenthaler and C. Yau, “Utilizing learning analytics to support study strategies,” Research and Practice in Technology Enhanced Learning, vol. 15, no. 6, 2020. [17] A. M. Sharples et al., “Digital personal assistants in education,” Open Learning, vol. 35, no. 1, 2020. [18] V. Kumar and A. Soman, “Student performance prediction using decision trees,” in Proc. IEEE ICACCCN, 2019. [19] K. W. Tham and K. N. Wong, “Machine learning approaches for academic analytics,” Journal of Educational Computing Research, 2019. [20] M. Khosravi, H. Shabaninejad, and S. Ghaffari, “Reinforcement learning-based tutoring systems,” IEEE Access, vol. 7, pp. 170982–170995, 2019. [21] S. Papamitsiou and A. Economides, “Learning analytics and educational data mining in practice,” Journal of Educational Technology & Society, vol. 17, no. 4, pp. 49–64, 2014. [22] A. Kaur and P. Singh, “AI-driven study planners for improving academic performance,” in Proc. IEEE ICICCT, 2022. [23] C. Romero and S. Ventura, “Educational data mining: A review,” IEEE Trans. Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 40, no. 6, pp. 601–618, 2010. [24] K. Bandi and S. Srinivasan, “Time management optimization using machine learning models,” International Journal of Intelligent Systems, 2021. [25] M. Joshi, “Cognitive load estimation using AI in e-learning environments,” Procedia Computer Science, vol. 172, pp. 987–995, 2020. [26] S. R. Ahmed and R. R. Patil, “Prediction of academic success using deep neural networks,” in Proc. IEEE ICCSP, 2020. [27] J. Greene et al., “Self-regulated learning and AI tutoring systems,” Educational Psychologist, 2018. [28] A. Almasri, B. Alsmadi, and I. Hmeidi, “Predicting student performance using regression analysis,” International Journal of Computer Science & Applications, vol. 16, 2019. [29] A. S. Ghosh and P. De, “A smart study assistant using artificial intelligence,” in Proc. IEEE SMARTTECH, 2021. [30] H. S. Raghavan, “AI-enabled personalized education systems: Challenges and opportunities,” IEEE Potentials, vol. 41, no. 4, pp. 35–41, 2022.
Publication Date
8/28/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...