Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM66807
Volume:
10 |
8 |
Aug 2026
Pages:
1-22
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
MBA/School of Business
Indira University, Pune, India
School of Business and Management
DES Pune University, Pune, India
Operations and Supply Chain Management (OSCM) has changed tremendously after the usage of Artificial Intelligence (AI). There has been huge development in the field of Generative Artificial Intelligence (GenAI), Large Language Models (LLMs) and Agentic AI. It has completely reshaped the domain of Operations and Supply Chain Management (OSCM). The research paper studies and maps 203 Dimensions records under the category of Articles from 2022-2026. For the study, VOSviewer software is used to do Bibliometric analysis to examine publication growth, authors, coauthors, citations, leading sources, countries, collaborations, research fronts, intellectual foundations and thematic growth in the field. The study shows that 86.70% of the corpus was published between 2025-2026. The most productive source was International Journal of Production Research. Dmitry Ivanov is the most prolific author, and China is the leading country when cooccurrence analysis is considered. Adoption and Integration of technologies such as GenAI, LLM -enabled decision support and operational intelligence, and Disruption responsive supply chain by adapting Agentic AI is on increase in today’s world. Five research fronts were shown by Bibliographic coupling. Overlay analysis shows a relative shift towards disruption management agentic applications automation digital twins and simulations. The study clearly indicates that Agentic Supply Chain is an emerging cutting-edge technology. The future research can be done on cybersecurity, resilience, multiagent coordination and human oversight.
KEYWORDS
This study provides a bibliometric and thematic examination of the emerging literature on Generative Artificial Intelligence, Large Language Models and Agentic AI in Operations and Supply Chain Management. Based on a final corpus of 203 articles published between 2022 and 14 August 2026, the analysis demonstrates that this research domain has expanded rapidly, particularly during 2025–2026, while simultaneously becoming more specialised in its technological and operational focus. The findings show that the field is developing around three major thematic streams: Generative AI Adoption and Integration in Supply Chain Management, LLM-Enabled Decision Support and Operational Intelligence, and Agentic AI for Adaptive and Disruption-Responsive Supply Chains. Bibliographic coupling further identified five contemporary research fronts relating to intelligent AI architectures, sustainability and human-centric supply chains, resilience and performance, organisational adoption, and AI-enabled risk sensing and visibility. The combined thematic and overlay analyses indicate an emerging progression from the use of Generative AI for information generation and organisational integration, toward Large Language Models for operational intelligence and decision support, and increasingly toward Agentic AI systems capable of participating in goal-directed operational activities. This progression should not be interpreted as evidence that fully autonomous supply chains have already emerged. Rather, it indicates a developing research frontier in which AI systems are being assigned progressively greater roles in sensing, reasoning, planning, coordination and selected forms of execution. A central contribution of this study is therefore the positioning of the Agentic Supply Chain as an emerging socio-technical system in which intelligent agents may increasingly interact with supply-chain data, digital twins, enterprise systems and human decision makers to support adaptive operational responses. Human oversight, accountability and organisational governance remain essential components of such systems. The study also reveals that the field remains theoretically and empirically immature in several areas. Questions concerning multi-agent coordination, human–agent collaboration, autonomous decision boundaries, governance, cybersecurity, explainability and real-world operational performance require substantially greater investigation. Future research should therefore move beyond conceptual demonstrations toward empirical studies capable of evaluating when, where and under what governance conditions agentic technologies create sustainable operational value. Overall, the evidence suggests that the next stage of AI-enabled Operations and Supply Chain Management will not be defined merely by the ability of artificial intelligence to generate information, but increasingly by its capacity to interpret operational environments, coordinate decisions and act toward defined supply-chain objectives. Understanding how this transition can occur responsibly, securely and effectively represents an important research agenda for the development of future Agentic Supply Chains.
[1] R. G. Richey, S. Chowdhury, B. Davis-Sramek, M. Giannakis, and Y. K. Dwivedi, “Artificial intelligence in logistics and supply chain management: A primer and roadmap for research,” Journal of Business Logistics, vol. 44, no. 4, pp. 532-549, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1111/jbl.12364 [2] S. F. Wamba, C. Guthrie, M. M. Queiroz, and S. Minner, “ChatGPT and generative artificial intelligence: An exploratory study of key benefits and challenges in operations and supply chain management,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 62, no. 16, pp. 5676-5696, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2023.2294116 [3] S. F. Wamba, M. M. Queiroz, C. J. C. Jabbour, and C. Shi, “Are both generative AI and ChatGPT game changers for 21st-century operations and supply chain excellence?” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 265, 109015, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2023.109015 [4] I. Jackson, D. Ivanov, A. Dolgui, and J. Namdar, “Generative artificial intelligence in supply chain and operations management: A capability-based framework for analysis and implementation,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 62, no. 17, pp. 6120-6145, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2024.2309309 [5] R. Dubey, A. Gunasekaran, and T. Papadopoulos, “Benchmarking operations and supply chain management practices using Generative AI: Towards a theoretical framework,” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, vol. 189, 103689, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2024.103689 [6] L. Li, Y. Liu, Y. Jin, T. C. E. Cheng, and Q. Zhang, “Generative AI-enabled supply chain management: The critical role of coordination and dynamism,” International Journal of Production Economics, vol. 277, 109388, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2024.109388 [7] L. Li, W. Zhu, L. Chen, and Y. Liu, “Generative AI usage and sustainable supply chain performance: A practice-based view,” Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, vol. 192, 103761, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2024.103761 [8] V. Jannelli, S. Schöpf, M. Bickel, T. Netland, and A. Brintrup, “Agentic LLMs in the supply chain: Towards autonomous multi-agent consensus-seeking,” International Journal of Production Research, ahead-of-print, pp. 1-31, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2025.2604311 [9] B. L. Aylak, “SustAI-SCM: Intelligent supply chain process automation with Agentic AI for sustainability and cost efficiency,” Sustainability, vol. 17, no. 6, 2453, 2025. https://doi.org/10.3390/su17062453 [10] D. Ivanov, “Agentic digital twins: Bridging model-based and AI-driven decision-making support for a new era of supply chain and operations management,” International Journal of Production Research, vol. 64, no. 15, pp. 6574-6590, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2026.2630277
Publication Date
8/17/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...