Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM66507
Volume:
10 |
8 |
Aug 2026
Pages:
1-25
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Independent Researcher
Independent Researcher
We define mass as the modulus-squared of a complex rotor βa quantised circulation in a source/sink mediumβ π = (π/2π2) π§π§βΎ, the elastic energy of a trapped vibration, in which the rotor phase cancels so that the Lorentz invariance of mass is manifest. From this single definition the fermion mass spectrum acquires a unified structure with four principal results. First, the Koide constant is a scale-invariant angle, π = 1/(3cos2π), so its constancy is geometry and its value the single condition π = 45β; each of the four sectors is then generated by one clock, one phase, and one amplitude, and every fermion mass is reproduced from its sector triple (charged leptons to 0.01%, up quarks to 0.5%, down quarks to 0.1%, neutrinos exactly in their inverse form). Second, the four clocks descend from a single clock at the grand-unification scale: read in its proper inverse form the neutrino clock is that scale, π β 2 Γ 1016 GeV β emergent, not inserted, and coinciding with the supersymmetric unification scale β and the charged-lepton clock descends from it through one chain, dimensional transmutation to π¬QCD, the rotor soliton to the nucleon, and the forced ππ = 3 to the per-rotor share ππ/ππ = 313 MeV, matched to better than half a percent. Third, the mechanism that carries a scale across the colour boundary is proven, not assumed: the stiffness multiplies a modulus that colour transformations leave exactly invariant (colour-blindness), and in the vortex ontology the free lepton and the confined quark share that scale by Kelvinβs circulation theorem β circulation is a topological invariant, the same free or bound. Assembling these, the charged-lepton sector reduces to a closed form, ππ = (ππ/ππ)[1 + β2cos(2/π2 + 2ππ/ππ)]2: three masses from the nucleon mass, the forced colour count, and one balance condition (π/π = β2, shown to be the equal-energy point of the two circulation modes). Fourth, the sector phase is not an input but is fixed by gauge quantum numbers: it has the closed form π = π’(1 β π’) (the same balance law as β2), with 1/π’ = π 1+π3+1/2 (πΆ (π))π built from the colour count π = 3, π 2 π the weak isospin π3, and the ππ(3) Casimir πΆ2(π) = 4/3, giving the clean rationals π = 2β9 , 3β16 , 8β81 , 11β144 for the lepton, down, neutrino, and up sectors to 0β3%. A consequence reaches inter-sector mixing: because the phase formula forces different sectors to different phases, the up and down (and the charged-lepton and neutrino) generation triangles are necessarily misaligned, so CP violation is forced to exist in both the CKM and PMNS sectors β nonzero precisely because the sectors carry different quantum numbers, with the quark misalignment exactly ππ β ππ’ = 1/9. The mixing angle magnitudes, by contrast, are not geometric: the three-fold symmetry that gives the clean spectrum forbids differential mixing, so the observed hierarchy is a mass-ratio (Fritzsch) effect. We are equally precise about the boundary. The overall scale remains an input, with the four clocks sharing no universal geometric base. The up sector, riding the electroweak vacuum value through the order-unity top Yukawa, is not an isolated exception but the π3 = + 1β2 branch of a weak-isospin selection rule: the up-type sectors (up, neutrino) ride the high electroweak-vev scale and the down-type sectors (down, charged lepton) the low QCD/rotor scale, so the same isospin flag that sets the phase also selects which condensate the clock couples to, with only the two condensate scales remaining inputs. Behind the phase formula the one residual step is to prove the family-holonomy multiplier is the colour Casimir rather than a coincidence of equal value. The underlying phenomenology βthe circulant, the sector pattern, the seesaw extension, the inverse relationβ is due to Koide, Foot, Brannen, Ε»enczykowski, and Rivero, whom we credit throughout; ours are the rotor definition of mass, the hydrodynamic reading of its scale through the unification-scale chain, the proofs above, and a boundary map that has reduced every remaining question to a specific calculation. The honest one-line summary: the geometry of circulation forces the form of the mass spectrum and, through the gauge quantum numbers it carries, the sector phase; the overall scale alone remains medium dynamics and input.
KEYWORDS
The honest summary is not that mass βcomes from geometryβ but something sharper: the geometry of circulation forces the form of the mass spectrum β its circulant, its ratios, the constancy of π, the balanced amplitude β while the scale is set by the dynamics of a medium (vortex circulation, confinement, one coupling); the phase is fixed by the gauge quantum numbers the geometry carries. That same phase, differing across sectors because their quantum numbers differ, forces CP violation to exist in both the CKM and PMNS sectors, while the mixing magnitudes remain a mass-ratio effect outside the geometry β an accurate map of what the circle governs and what it does not. Mass is the circulation energy of a rotor in the source/sink medium, patterned by geometry. Much of the underlying phenomenology β the circulant, the sector pattern, the seesaw extension, the inverse relation β is due to the cited authors; ours are the rotor definition of mass, the hydrodynamic reading of its scale, the boundary map of what geometry does and does not force, and the programme (Sec. 9) that reduces every remaining question to a specific calculation. The complex rotor is the internal parameter of a real mass relation; π§βΎ = π§β1 on the circle is a fact about that parameter space, carrying no claim about physical space.
1.Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Y. Koide, βA fermionβboson composite model of quarks and leptons,β Phys. Lett. B 120, 161 (1983); Prog. Theor. Phys. 89, 73 (1983). 2.Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β R. Foot, βA note on Koideβs lepton mass relation,β arXiv:hep-ph/9402242 (1994). 3.Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β C. A. Brannen, βThe lepton masses as circulant eigenvaluesβ (2006); formal statements appear in [4] and in J. Kocik, arXiv:1201.2067 (2012). 4.Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β P. Ε»enczykowski,Β Β Β βKoideβsΒ Β π3-symmetric parametrization,Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β quark masses and mixings,β Phys. Rev. D 86, 117303 (2012); 87, 077302 (2013). 5.Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Y. Koide, βUniversal seesaw mass matrix model and neutrino phenomenology,β arXiv:hep-ph/9805441 (1998). 6.Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β M. S. Chanowitz, J. Ellis, M. K. Gaillard, βThe price of natural flavour conservation in neutral weak interactions,β Nucl. Phys. B 128, 506 (1977). 7.Β Β Β Β Β Β Β Β A. Rivero, βA Koide tuple for strangeβcharmβbottom and the inverse relation,β arXiv:2606.10060 (2026).
Publication Date
8/4/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
12
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...