Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM66303
Volume:
10 |
7 |
Jul 2026
Pages:
1-13
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Department of Professional Studies
St. Francis College for Women
Positive psychology has largely conceptualised human flourishing through two dominant paradigms: hedonic well-being, centred on pleasure and life satisfaction, and eudaimonic well-being, rooted in meaning, purpose, and self-actualisation. Both frameworks, however, operate within the bounds of the psychological self—the ego, the personality, and the narrative identity. This paper examines whether such frameworks are sufficient by turning to the philosophy of Osho (Bhagwan Shree Rajneesh) and his central teaching of witnessing (sakshi). For Osho, witnessing is not a psychological exercise but a transcendence of the psychological altogether and that is a shift from identifying with thoughts and emotions to becoming the neutral, aware observer of them. The paper proceeds in six parts. It begins by examining the hedonic and eudaimonic paradigms within positive psychology, identifying an assumption in both of them, that well-being is fundamentally psychological in nature. It then introduces the concept of ontological well-being (OWB) as a theoretical refinement that incorporates a whole-time perspective on life evaluation, while noting that OWB remains concerned with the “content” of life rather than the conscious space in which evaluation occurs. The paper then goes on to articulate Osho's philosophy of witnessing, drawing on his discourses and the Upanishadic tradition, and demonstrates how witnessing complements and deepens the OWB framework. The practical dimensions of witnessing are then outlined through a systematic four-stage model accessible to laypeople and applicable in daily life. The paper subsequently engages in a critical dialogue between these perspectives, arguing that Osho's framework both complements and challenges positive psychology and it offers a deeper foundation for resilience and emotional regulation. It also questions positive psychology's reliance on effortful interventions and self-report measures. Finally, it discusses the limitations of the present study and outlines directions for future research. This paper argues that witnessing offers a third and a hitherto under-explored model of well-being, referred as ontological well-being, which is rooted not in the content of experience but in the conscious space in which experience arises. Through this critical dialogue, the paper contends that witnessing produces psychological benefits, including resilience, emotional regulation, and reduced rumination but not as direct goals, but as inevitable byproducts of a deeper state of silence and equanimity. Conversely, it challenges positive psychology's reliance on effortful interventions and self-report measures, proposing that the highest form of flourishing may be non-cultivated and non-psychological in nature. By introducing Osho's framework, this paper invites the field of positive psychology to expand its ontological horizons, from the management of psychological states to the recognition of consciousness itself as the ground of genuine well-being.
KEYWORDS
This paper concludes with several key propositions that carry implications for positive psychology, contemplative practice, and the broader understanding of human flourishing. First, the paper concludes that positive psychology's dominant frameworks, hedonic and eudaimonic well-being are incomplete without acknowledging the ontological dimension of human experience. While they capture important aspects of flourishing, they remain confined to the psychological domain and do not address the possibility of a well-being that transcends psychological states altogether. This limitation is not merely theoretical but has practical implications for how well-being is measured, cultivated, and understood. Second, the paper concludes that Osho's concept of witnessing offers a genuine third paradigm of well-being: ontological well-being rooted in the conscious space in which all experiences arise and pass. This is not a state within the psychological self but a recognition of the witnessing awareness prior to and beyond the psychological self. Unlike hedonic well-being (rooted in pleasant feeling states) or eudaimonic well-being (rooted in meaning and purpose), ontological well-being is rooted in the recognition of oneself as the witness rather than the witnessed. Third, the paper concludes that witnessing produces psychological benefits like resilience, emotional regulation, and reduced rumination, not as direct goals, but as inevitable byproducts of a deeper state of silence and equanimity. This has significant implications for intervention design: rather than seeking to cultivate psychological skills, interventions might invite participants to recognise the witnessing awareness that is already present. This shift from cultivation to recognition represents a fundamental reorientation of how well-being might be approached. Fourth, the paper concludes that the integration of Osho's witnessing with the OWB framework offers a more comprehensive model of human flourishing, one that encompasses both the content of life (goals, meanings, purposes) and the consciousness that experiences it. In this integrative model, OWB provides the framework for understanding life as a meaningful project, while Osho's witnessing illuminates the awareness that undertakes and transcends this project. Fifth, the paper concludes that contemplative pedagogy and related approaches offer practical pathways for incorporating witnessing and ontological well-being into psychological education and practice (McCaw et al., 2025). By cultivating the capacity to observe thoughts, emotions, and physical sensations without identification or judgment, psychologists and educators can support individuals in recognising the witnessing awareness that is their fundamental nature.
Araújo, L., Ribeiro, O. and Paúl, C. (2017) 'Hedonic and eudaimonic well-being in old age through positive psychology studies: a scoping review', Anales de Psicología, 33(3), pp. 1–11. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990) Flow: The Psychology of Optimal Experience. New York: Harper and Row. Diener, E., Suh, E.M., Lucas, R.E. and Smith, H.L. (1999) 'Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress', Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), pp. 276–302. Duminskaya, M.V. (2020) 'The well-being phenomenon in the context of existential and ontological understanding', CyberLeninka. Available at: https://cyberleninka.ru (Accessed: 19 June 2026). Fredrickson, B.L. (2001) 'The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions', American Psychologist, 56(3), pp. 218–226. Frontiers in Psychology (2026) 'From Happiness to Meaning: A Systematic Review of Quantitative Research on Core Constructs in Positive Psychology Research', Frontiers in Psychology. Available at: https://www.frontiersin.org (Accessed: 19 June 2026). Henderson, L.W. and Knight, T. (2012) 'Integrating the hedonic and eudaimonic perspectives to better understand the relationship between well-being and health', Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(4), pp. 723–745. Kaba, İ. (2020) 'Ontolojik İyi-Oluş (Yaşam Projesi) [Ontological Well-Being (Life Project)]', Psikiyatride Güncel Yaklaşımlar, 12(1), pp. 143–154. Kabat-Zinn, J. (1990) Full Catastrophe Living: Using the Wisdom of Your Body and Mind to Face Stress, Pain, and Illness. New York: Delacorte Press. Kahneman, D., Diener, E. and Schwarz, N. (eds.) (1999) Well-Being: The Foundations of Hedonic Psychology. New York: Russell Sage Foundation.
Publication Date
7/23/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
4
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...