Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM68039
Volume:
10 |
10 |
Oct 2026
Pages:
1-6
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Department of Computer Science and Information Technology
Babu Banarasi Das University
Department of Computer Science and Information Technology
Babu Banarasi Das University
Department of Computer Science and Information Technology
Babu Banarasi Das University
Department of Computer Science and Information Technology
Babu Banarasi Das University
Cyber defence is being stretched by two forces at once: an ex-panding attack surface and adversaries who now use genera-tiveAI models to write phishing lures, mutate malware and au-tomate reconnaissance. The same family of models, which in-cludes large language models (LLMs), autoencoders and genera-tive adversarial networks, can also help defenders, yet recent surveys examine threat intelligence, detection and autonomous response in isolation. This paper follows a single piece of intelli-gence from ingestion to action. We review work published since 2024 and propose GenDefend, a five-layer reference framework that links generative threat-intelligence extraction, generative detection, LLM-based reasoning and a risk-gated autonomous response layer. To test parts of the design we built a reproduci-ble synthetic flow dataset of 12,000 records with six traffic clas-ses and ran controlled experiments. Autoencoder-based latent augmentation raised the macro recall of a random forest from 0.850 to 0.862, removing threat-intelligence features cost 2.8 points of macro F1, and a reconstruction-based scorer reached AUC values of 0.89–0.96 on attack types it had never seen. A Monte-Carlo simulation under stated assumptions suggests that graded autonomy could shorten mean time to containment sev-eral-fold. We close with the risks that must be managed before such systems are trusted in production.
KEYWORDS
We examined how generative AI can support a defender from the first piece of intelligence to the final containment action, and proposed GenDefend as a five-layer design that keeps humans in control of high-risk decisions. Our experiments on a synthetic dataset indicate that threat-intelligence features add measurable value, that generative augmentation gives a modest gain for rare attacks without clearly beating simpler oversampling, and that reconstruction-based scoring is a useful but not universally best detector of unseen attacks. A simulation under stated assumptions suggests that graded autonomy can shorten containment considerably while exposing a clear trade-off with unnecessary disruption. Because the evidence is synthetic, the main value of this work is the structure it offers and the questions it sharpens; confirming the findings on real data is the next step
[1] S. Metta, I. Chang, J. Parker, M. P. Roman, and A. F. Ehuan, “Generative AI in cybersecurity,” 2024, arXiv:2405.01674. [2] P. Balasubramanian, S. Liyana, H. Sankaran, S. Sivaramakrishnan, S. Pusuluri, S. Pirttikangas, and E. Peltonen, “Generative AI for cyber threat intelligence: Applications, challenges, and analysis of real-world case studies,” Artif. Intell. Rev., vol. 58, Art. no. 336, 2025, doi: 10.1007/s10462-025-11338-z. [3] M. A. Ferrag, F. Alwahedi, A. Battah, B. Cherif, A. Mechri, and N. Tihanyi, “Generative AI and large language models for cyber security: All insights you need,” 2024, arXiv:2405.12750. [4] Y. Yao, J. Duan, K. Xu, Y. Cai, Z. Sun, and Y. Zhang, “A survey on large language model (LLM) security and privacy: The good, the bad, and the ugly,” High-Confidence Comput., vol. 4, no. 2, 2024. [5] H. Xu et al., “Large language models for cyber security: A systematic literature review,” 2024, arXiv:2405.04760. [6] M. Andreoni, W. T. Lunardi, G. Lawton, and S. Thakkar, “Enhancing autonomous system security and resilience with generative AI: A comprehensive survey,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 109470–109493, 2024, doi: 10.1109/ACCESS.2024.3439363. [7] M. Bayer, P. Kuehn, R. Shanehsaz, and C. Reuter, “CySecBERT: A domain-adapted language model for the cybersecurity domain,” ACM Trans. Privacy Secur., vol. 27, no. 2, pp. 1–20, May 2024. [8] M. A. Ferrag et al., “Revolutionizing cyber threat detection with large language models: A privacy-preserving BERT-based lightweight model for IoT/IIoT devices,” IEEE Access, vol. 12, pp. 23733–23750, 2024. [9] S. Shafee, A. Bessani, and P. M. Ferreira, “Evaluation of LLM chatbots for OSINT-based cyber threat awareness,” 2024, arXiv:2401.15127. [10] F. Sufi, “An innovative GPT-based open-source intelligence using historical cyber incident reports,” Natural Lang. Process. J., vol. 7, Art. no. 100074, Jun. 2024.
Publication Date
10/16/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
6
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
10
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...