Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM67348

GraphRAG: The Next Generation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM67348

Volume:

10 |

9 |

Sep 2026

Pages:

1-8

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM67348

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

Yallanagouda Basanagouda Hulyal

Yallanagouda Basanagouda Hulyal

Computer science

CMR UNIVERSITY

Download Author Certificate
DUR

Dr Umadevi Ramamoorthy

Computer science

CMR UNIVERSITY

Download Co-Author Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) has become a standard technique for grounding large language models (LLMs) in external knowledge, yet conventional vector-based RAG retrieves isolated, unstructured text chunks that often fail to preserve the relational context required for multi-hop and compositional reasoning. Graph-based Retrieval-Augmented Generation (GraphRAG) addresses this limitation by incorporating explicit relational structure — entities, relations, and subgraphs — into the retrieval and generation pipeline. This paper synthesizes seven recent contributions spanning multi-hop question decomposition, multi-aspect adaptive retrieval, fine-tuning-free subgraph retrieval, domain-specific knowledge-graph construction, an analogous LLM-and-graph application outside question answering, and a unifying survey taxonomy, to characterize the current state of GraphRAG research. A structured comparison of methods, datasets, and reported gains is presented alongside a synthesis of consensus findings and open debates, including whether GraphRAG requires LLM fine-tuning, how graph-construction cost weighs against its benefits, and which retrieval granularity contributes most to downstream performance. Building on this synthesis, the paper identifies a central, unaddressed gap — the absence of a controlled, cross-architecture evaluation protocol — and proposes a research agenda, termed the GraphRAG Attribution Study, designed to isolate the pipeline stages and structural granularities responsible for reported improvements over vector-only RAG.

KEYWORDS

GraphRAG; Retrieval-Augmented Generation; Knowledge Graphs; Multi-hop Reasoning; Subgraph Retrieval; Large Language Models; Graph Neural Networks; Question Answering.

Cite This Article

Yallanagouda Basanagouda Hulyal, Dr Umadevi Ramamoorthy, "GraphRAG: The Next Generation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 9, pp. 1-8, Sep 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM67348

Full Article/Conclusion

This paper has synthesized seven methodologically distinct contributions to GraphRAG research into a coherent thematic map organized around a common five-stage reference pipeline. The synthesis shows that the field agrees on the core failure mode of vector-only retrieval and on the value of explicit relational structure for multi-hop and grounded reasoning, while remaining divided on whether fine-tuning is necessary, how graph-construction cost should be weighed against its benefits, and which structural granularity matters most. A structured comparison against traditional RAG highlights that GraphRAG's stronger multi-hop reasoning and explainability come at the cost of greater architectural complexity and a considerably less standardized evaluation landscape. Building on these findings, the paper has proposed a controlled, cross-architecture attribution study as the most promising direction for converting GraphRAG's currently anecdotal, architecture-specific claims into generalizable, mechanism-level knowledge — a contribution that would benefit both researchers seeking to understand why GraphRAG works and practitioners seeking to deploy it reliably outside the narrow benchmarks on which it has so far been demonstrated.

References

[1] K. Liang, W. Chen, and J. Park, "Multi-hop question decomposition and LoRA-based fine-tuning for temporal knowledge editing on MQUAKE-T," in Proc. Int. Conf. on Knowledge-Grounded Language Models, 2025. [2] Y. Xu, H. Zhao, and M. Feng, "AMAR: Adaptive multi-aspect retrieval augmentation with relevance gating for knowledge-graph question answering," in Proc. Conf. on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing, 2025. [3] L. Wu, T. Yang, and R. Simmons, "LLM-driven differential testing of graph databases via generated Cypher and Gremlin queries," in Proc. Int. Conf. on Software Engineering, 2024. [4] S. Bai, A. Ramanathan, and P. Nguyen, "KG-FM: Large-scale LLM-driven knowledge-graph construction and Cypher-grounded retrieval-augmented generation for materials science," in Proc. Int. Conf. on Applications of Artificial Intelligence in Science, 2025. [5] Q. Zhu, F. Li, and D. Tanaka, "KG2RAG: Knowledge-graph-guided expansion and paragraph reorganization for retrieval-augmented generation," in Proc. Association for Computational Linguistics, 2025. [6] J. Li, C. Wang, and E. Novak, "SubgraphRAG: Efficient, fine-tuning-free subgraph retrieval for knowledge-graph question answering," in Proc. Int. Conf. on Learning Representations, 2025. [7] Y. Han, B. Osei, and V. Petrova, "A survey of graph-based retrieval-augmented generation: Taxonomy, techniques, and open problems," ACM Computing Surveys, 2025.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

9/18/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

0

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

7

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...