Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM63952
Volume:
10 |
5 |
May 2026
Pages:
1-9
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

PG Department of Commerce and Business Administration
Khalsa College Amritsar
Greenwashing has become a major concern in modern marketing as many companies promote their products as “eco-friendly” or “sustainable” without actually following genuine environmental practices. This study examines the concept of greenwashing and its impact on consumer trust and sustainable buying behaviour. The research highlights how businesses use misleading environmental claims to improve brand image, attract customers, and increase sales. The study also explores consumer awareness regarding greenwashing and how people react when they discover false sustainability claims made by companies. The findings reveal that environmental claims strongly influence consumer purchasing decisions, but repeated cases of greenwashing have made consumers more cautious and skeptical. Many consumers no longer fully trust green advertisements and prefer companies that provide honest and transparent information about their environmental practices. The study further shows that greenwashing negatively affects brand reputation and reduces long-term consumer trust. Social media also plays an important role in exposing misleading environmental marketing practices and spreading awareness among consumers. The research concludes that businesses should focus on genuine sustainability efforts instead of deceptive marketing strategies. Ethical marketing, transparency, and responsible environmental practices are essential for building consumer confidence and maintaining long-term customer relationships in today’s competitive market.
KEYWORDS
Greenwashing has become a serious issue in modern marketing because many companies use false or exaggerated environmental claims to attract consumers and improve their brand image. As people become more environmentally conscious, businesses increasingly promote products as “green,” “eco-friendly,” or “sustainable.” However, when companies fail to support these claims with genuine environmental practices, consumer trust is negatively affected. The study revealed that consumers today are more aware of greenwashing and often become skeptical about environmental advertisements after discovering misleading claims. According to Chen and Chang (2013), greenwashing creates confusion among consumers and reduces trust in green marketing practices. This not only harms dishonest companies but also affects businesses that genuinely follow sustainable and ethical practices. The study also highlights that honesty, transparency, and ethical marketing are essential for building long-term consumer trust and positive brand reputation. Consumers are willing to support and even pay more for products that are genuinely environmentally friendly and socially responsible. Social media and digital platforms have further increased consumer awareness and corporate accountability by exposing misleading environmental practices quickly (Lyon & Montgomery, 2015). Therefore, companies should focus on real sustainability efforts instead of using sustainability only as a promotional strategy. Genuine environmental responsibility and transparent communication can help businesses build stronger relationships with consumers and achieve long-term success in the competitive market.
1. Chen, Y. S. and Chang, C. H. (2013) ‘Greenwash and green trust: The mediation effects of green consumer confusion and green perceived risk’, Journal of Business Ethics, 114(3), pp. 489–500. 2. Delmas, M. A. and Burbano, V. C. (2011) ‘The drivers of greenwashing’, California Management Review, 54(1), pp. 64–87. 3. Lyon, T. P. and Montgomery, A. W. (2015) ‘The means and end of greenwash’, Organization & Environment, 28(2), pp. 223–249. 4. Nyilasy, G., Gangadharbatla, H. and Paladino, A. (2014) ‘Perceived greenwashing: The effects of green marketing on environmental and product perceptions’, Journal of Business Ethics, 125(4), pp. 693–707. 5. Peattie, K. and Crane, A. (2005) ‘Green marketing: Legend, myth, farce or prophecy?’, Qualitative Market Research, 8(4), pp. 357–370. 6. TerraChoice Environmental Marketing (2010) The sins of greenwashing. TerraChoice Group Inc. 7. Banerjee, S. B. (2008) ‘Corporate social responsibility: The good, the bad and the ugly’, Critical Sociology, 34(1), pp. 51–79. 8. Becker-Olsen, K. L. and Potucek, S. (2013) ‘Greenwashing’, in Idowu, S. O. et al. (eds.) Encyclopedia of Corporate Social Responsibility. Berlin: Springer, pp. 1318–1323. 9. Dahl, R. (2010) ‘Green washing: Do you know what you’re buying?’, Environmental Health Perspectives, 118(6), pp. A246–A252. 10. Du, X. (2015) ‘How the market values greenwashing? Evidence from China’, Journal of Business Ethics, 128(3), pp. 547–574.
Publication Date
5/25/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
5
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...