Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM65066
Volume:
10 |
6 |
Jun 2026
Pages:
1-3
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Department of Computer Engineering
Bharati Vidyapeeth's College of Engineering, Lavale
Department of Computer Engineering
Bharati Vidyapeeth's College of Engineering, Lavale
Department of Computer Engineering
Bharati Vidyapeeth's College of Engineering, Lavale
Department of Computer Engineering
Bharati Vidyapeeth's College of Engineering, Lavale
Blockchain-based land registry systems improve transparency and security in property management but assume the owner is always available to sign using their private key. This assumption fails in cases of key loss, temporary incapacity, or death. This paper proposes the Guardian Key Protocol (GKP), a recovery mechanism built atop a dual-signature blockchain land registry. GKP combines Shamir’s Secret Sharing for distributed key custody, government-authorized oracle verification to authenticate off-chain trigger events, and time-locked smart contract finalization to prevent fraudulent recovery attempts. Three guardian nodes pre-registered by the owner hold key shards, and recovery requires a 2-of-3 threshold together with a mandatory government escrow shard, ensuring no single party can unilaterally recover the key. The protocol aligns with Indian legal instruments including the Information Technology Act of 2000, the Registration Act of 1908, and the Indian Succession Act of 1925. GKP extends the security model of dual-signature land registries to cover succession, guardianship, and key-loss scenarios without compromising routine operation.
KEYWORDS
This paper has proposed the Guardian Key Protocol (GKP), a recovery framework that addresses a fundamental vulnerability in blockchain-based land registry systems: the implicit assumption that the property owner is always available and capable of signing transactions. By integrating Shamir’s Secret Sharing for distributed key custody, government-authorized oracle verification for legally anchored trigger authentication, and time-locked smart contract finalization for fraud resistance, GKP provides a comprehensive response to the failure scenarios of key loss, temporary incapacity, and owner death. Unlike general-purpose cryptographic key recovery schemes, GKP is purpose-built for the institutional, legal, and operational context of state-managed property records. It is not merely a technological contribution but a legal and institutional innovation, enabling blockchain-based land registries to reliably support succession, guardianship, and recovery without immobilizing ownership or compromising the security of the underlying registry. Future work should address prototype implementation, formal security proofs, and pilot evaluation within a government land registry environment [3][1].
[1] [General blockchain land registry and cryptographic recovery reference — full citation to be supplied by authors] [2] Government of India, “The Information Technology Act, 2000,” Ministry of Electronics & Information Technology, New Delhi, 2000. [3] Government of India, “The Indian Succession Act, 1925,” Ministry of Law and Justice, New Delhi, 1925. [4] Government of India, “The Registration Act, 1908,” Ministry of Law and Justice, New Delhi, 1908. [5] Drishti Judiciary, “Digital Signature and Electronic Signature,” [Online]. Available: https://www.drishtijudiciary.com [Accessed: 2024]. [6] [Land registry blockchain research / case studies reference — full citation to be supplied by authors]
Publication Date
6/16/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...