Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM67494
Volume:
10 |
9 |
Sep 2026
Pages:
1-8
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Computer Science
P R Pote Patil College Of Engineering And Management, Amravati

COmputer Science
P R Pote Patil College Of Engineering And Management, Amravati

Computer Science
P R Pote Patil College Of Engineering And Management, Amravati

Computer Science
P R Pote Patil College Of Engineering And Management, Amravati

Computer Science
P R Pote Patil College Of Engineering And Management, Amravati

Computer Science
P R Pote Patil College Of Engineering And Management, Amravati
Artificial Intelligence (AI) is transforming preventive healthcare by enabling early disease prediction, intelligent clinical decision support, automated medical report analysis, and personalized healthcare recommendations. This review examines recent advancements in AI-based healthcare technologies, including Machine Learning (ML), Natural Language Processing (NLP), Optical Character Recognition (OCR), Electronic Health Records (EHRs), and Large Language Models (LLMs). The reviewed studies highlight significant improvements in disease prediction, medical documentation, and patient care while identifying challenges such as data privacy, model reliability, interoperability, and clinical validation. Based on these findings, this paper presents the HealthGuardian framework, an integrated AI-powered preventive healthcare platform that combines symptom assessment, medical report analysis, secure health record management, and personalized health guidance. The review emphasizes the need for reliable, explainable, and secure AI solutions to improve preventive healthcare and patient outcomes.
KEYWORDS
Artificial Intelligence is increasingly being applied across different areas of healthcare, including predictive analysis, clinical text processing, electronic health record access, medical summarization, and personalized recommendations. The literature reviewed in this paper demonstrates that these technologies can provide useful capabilities, but it also reveals recurring limitations related to validation, reliability, restricted evaluation settings, privacy, and the quality of AI-generated outputs [1]–[6]. The analysis indicates that many existing systems concentrate on individual healthcare tasks. Machine learning models may focus on disease prediction, NLP systems on information extraction or decision support, chatbots on information retrieval, and recommendation systems on specific treatment-related outputs. These approaches demonstrate the value of individual technologies but do not by themselves provide a unified preventive healthcare workflow. Based on these observations, the HealthGuardian framework is proposed as an integrated platform combining patient input, medical-report processing, OCR, AI-based analysis, health-record management, personalized guidance, and role-based dashboards. The framework is designed to connect complementary AI technologies rather than relying on one model for all healthcare tasks. At the same time, the proposed system should be regarded as a supportive healthcare platform rather than a replacement for qualified medical professionals. Future work should therefore focus on technical validation, external evaluation, privacy and security testing, explainability, interoperability, and expert review. With these safeguards, integrated AI-based platforms can be investigated further as tools for organizing health information and supporting preventive healthcare workflows.
[1] D. Van Veen, C. Van Uden, L. Blankemeier et al., "Adapted Large Language Models Can Outperform Medical Experts in Clinical Text Summarization," Nature Medicine, vol. 30, no. 4, pp. 1134–1142, 2024, doi: 10.1038/s41591-024-02855-5. [2] H. Eguia, C. L. Sánchez-Bocanegra, F. Vinciarelli, F. Alvarez-Lopez, and F. Saigí-Rubió, "Clinical Decision Support and Natural Language Processing in Medicine: Systematic Literature Review," Journal of Medical Internet Research, vol. 26, e55315, 2024, doi: 10.2196/55315. [3] P. B. Gowramma, K. Kumar, M. S. Prema, et al., "AI-powered Chatbot integration for enhanced accessibility of electronic health records in a pediatric hospital," Scientific Reports, vol. 16, art. no. 13287, 2026, doi: 10.1038/s41598-026-42475-2. [4] A. Hamidi and K. Roberts, "Evaluation of AI Chatbots for Patient-Specific EHR Questions," arXiv preprint arXiv:2306.02549, 2023. [5] H. Zhang, J. Wen, J. Li, Y. Song, L.-J. Zhang, and L. Ma, "SSPNet: Leveraging Robust Medication Recommendation with History and Knowledge," in Proceedings of the Thirty-Fourth International Joint Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI), AI4Tech, pp. 9465–9473, 2025, doi: 10.24963/ijcai.2025/1052. [6] World Health Organization, Ethics and Governance of Artificial Intelligence for Health. Geneva, Switzerland: WHO, 2021. [7] S. Secinaro, D. Calandra, A. Secinaro, V. Muthurangu, and P. Biancone, "The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare: A Structured Literature Review," BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, vol. 21, no. 1, 2021. [8] S. Yadav and S. Shukla, "Analysis of k-Fold Cross-Validation over Hold-Out Validation on Colossal Datasets for Quality Classification," in Proc. IEEE International Advanced Computing Conference, 2016. [9] F. Jiang, Y. Jiang, H. Zhi, et al., "Artificial intelligence in healthcare: past, present and future," Stroke and Vascular Neurology, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 230–243, 2017, doi: 10.1136/svn-2017-000101. [10] M. Rajkomar, J. Dean, and I. Kohane, "Machine Learning in Medicine," New England Journal of Medicine, vol. 380, no. 14, pp. 1347–1358, 2019.
Publication Date
9/25/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
4
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...