Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM6979
Volume:
5 |
2 |
Feb 2021
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
As data volumes and velocity continue to grow, hybrid data pipelines encompassing both batch and streaming modes have become a cornerstone of modern analytics. Engineers and architects often face a critical question: Which data processing framework Apache Beam, Apache Spark, or Apache Flink best fits their workloads? Each technology offers unique strengths in programming model, runtime efficiency, ecosystem integration, and operational overhead. This paper presents an in-depth exploration of Beam, Spark, and Flink for building hybrid pipelines, examining their respective architectural designs, performance characteristics, fault-tolerance mechanisms, and developer ergonomics. We propose a systematic approach to framework selection by outlining typical data pipeline patterns: pure batch, streaming, micro-batching, unified batch-stream, and continuous dataflows. Through code snippets, architecture diagrams, and performance benchmarks, we reveal how each framework can address scenario-specific constraints such as low-latency ingestion, high-volume batch transformations, or advanced streaming analytics. Finally, we discuss real-world deployment stories, best practices for orchestrating multi-framework data platforms, and relevant anti-patterns that hamper pipeline scalability or maintainability. By combining theory, empirical results, and practical guidelines, this paper aims to equip data engineers, architects, and DevOps teams with the insights necessary to choose and implement a robust, cost-effective hybrid data pipeline strategy.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
1/17/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...