Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM60616
Volume:
10 |
4 |
April 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Online reviews for doctors and hospitals have become increasingly common, yet most rating platforms continue to reduce patient experience down to a single star score — which, in our view, barely scratches the surface of what patients actually experienced. This paper presents a Hybrid Sentiment Analysis Framework designed to evaluate healthcare providers more meaningfully, by combining the narrative content of patient reviews with their corresponding numerical scores. We gathered 500 patient reviews and ran them through a preprocessing pipeline covering stopword removal, tokenization, and lemmatization, then applied TextBlob and VADER to compute sentiment polarity for each review. The resulting sentiment score is blended with the numeric rating through a weighted formula to produce what we call the Final Provider Score (FPS). Our experiments show this hybrid approach correlates far more strongly with real patient satisfaction (r = 0.82) compared to star ratings alone (r = 0.61). We believe that deploying a framework like this on healthcare platforms could genuinely help patients choose the right provider — and help hospitals pinpoint exactly where they need to improve.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
4/19/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
0
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...