Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM64837
Volume:
10 |
6 |
Jun 2026
Pages:
1-9
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
computer science and engineering
Shivalik college of engineering
computer science and engineering
Shivalik college of engineering
computer science and engineering
Shivalik college of engineering
computer science and engineering
Shivalik college of engineering
computer science and engineering
Shivalik college of engineering
Dividing long documents into semantically coherent chunks is a foundational requirement for vector-based information retrieval and Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems. Naive chunking methods (e.g., fixed-token windows) create arbitrary splits that cut across topics, leading to semantic dilution in embeddings and reduced retrieval accuracy. In this paper, we propose a Hybrid Weighted Latent Semantic Analysis (LSA) and Embedding-Based Semantic Text Segmentation system. The proposed model combines dense transformer-based sentence embeddings with low-rank, position-weighted LSA topic vectors, structural layout signals, and lexical keyword overlap. Additionally, we implement a Global Semantic Merge Pass guided by a multi-objective Retrieval Utility function to enforce a minimum quality standard on the output chunks. We evaluate our approach on the English Wikisection dataset. The optimized hybrid splitter significantly outperforms standard chunkers, achieving a Topic Coherence of 0.50, reducing WindowDiff to 0.3582, and improving retrieval accuracy to Recall@1 = 0.743 and MRR = 0.786 when indexed in a vector database (FAISS).
KEYWORDS
Empirical results on the WikiSection dataset demonstrate that the proposed framework significantly outperforms conventional chunking approaches, achieving Recall@1 = 0.743 and MRR = 0.786 while maintaining semantically coherent retrieval-ready chunks. Notably, the Hybrid + FT (Optimized) framework successfully satisfies all target performance criteria presented in Table I. These findings highlight the effectiveness of combining transformer-based embeddings with weighted latent semantic analysis and structural document signals for retrieval-oriented text segmentation. Future work will investigate larger-scale evaluation, multilingual corpora, and LLM-assisted boundary detection to further improve semantic chunking for Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems [8], [13].
[1] N. Reimers and I. Gurevych, "Sentence-BERT: Sentence embeddings using Siamese BERT-networks," in Proc. 2019 Conf. Empir. Methods Nat. Lang. Process. (EMNLP), 2019. [2] M. A. Hearst, "TextTiling: Segmenting text into multi-paragraph subtopic discussions," Comput. Linguist., vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 33–64, 1997. [3] F. Y. Choi, "A latent semantic indexing approach to text segmentation," in Proc. 1st Meet. North Amer. Chapter Assoc. Comput. Linguist. (NAACL), 2000. [4] S. Deerwester, S. T. Dumais, G. W. Furnas, T. K. Landauer, and R. Harshman, "Indexing by latent semantic analysis," J. Amer. Soc. Inf. Sci., vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 391–407, 1990. [5] D. M. Blei, A. Y. Ng, and M. I. Jordan, "Latent Dirichlet allocation," J. Mach. Learn. Res., vol. 3, pp. 993–1022, 2003. [6] A. Vaswani et al., "Attention is all you need," in Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. (NeurIPS), 2017. [7] J. Devlin, M. W. Chang, K. Lee, and K. Toutanova, "BERT: Pre-training of deep bidirectional transformers for language understanding," in Proc. 2019 Conf. North Amer. Chapter Assoc. Comput. Linguist. (NAACL), 2019. [8] P. S. H. Lewis et al., "Retrieval-augmented generation for knowledge-intensive NLP tasks," in Adv. Neural Inf. Process. Syst. (NeurIPS), 2020. [9] J. Gao, J. Kulkarni, and B. Zhang, "Text segmentation for information retrieval: A survey," ACM Comput. Surv., vol. 55, no. 8, pp. 1–35, 2022. [10] V. Karpukhin et al., "Dense passage retrieval for open-domain question answering," in Proc. 2020 Conf. Empir. Methods Nat. Lang. Process. (EMNLP), 2020, pp. 6769–6781.
Publication Date
6/11/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
4
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...