Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM22916
Volume:
7 |
6 |
Jun 2023
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Decentralization, transparency, and immutability are the three pillars on which the blockchain’s digital system is built. Two well-known Blockchain platforms, Bitcoin and Ethereum, allow users to deal anonymously online while being globally connected peer-to-peer. The enormous volume of decentralized transactions and the participants’ apparent anonymity make it possible for scams, cyber frauds, hacks, money laundering, and fraudulent transactions. Since standard auditing approaches require more processing power, time, and memory for complicated queries to join combinations of data, it is difficult to identify such fraudulent acts using them. Utilizing machine learning algorithms is one strategy to get rid of fraud. Machine learning can be either supervised or unsupervised in nature. Several machine learning strategies have been presented in earlier works to address this issue, and while some of the results seem extremely promising, there is no one approach that stands out as being clearly superior. In those studies, the effectiveness of several supervised machine learning models, including SVM, Decision Tree, Naive Bayes, Logistic Regression, and a few deep learning models, was compared in order to identify fraudulent transactions in a blockchain network.We notice that these models have limitations such as scalability and accuracy. We propose a new Machine Learning method i.e, XGB classifier to handle the above problem in addition to existing methods. Where we discuss the limitations like scalability, accuracy and handling of missing values. We conclude by highlighting the advantages of our proposed system in comparison to that of previous existing methods.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
5/5/2023
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
4
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...