Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM14993
Volume:
6 |
6 |
Jun 2022
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Defect classifiers are widely used by many large software corporations. Defect classifiers are commonly interpreted to uncover insights to improve software quality. Such insights help practitioners formulate strategies for effective testing, defect avoidance, and quality assurance [8, 9]. Therefore, it is pivotal that these generated insights are reliable. When interpreting classifiers, prior studies typically employ a feature importance method to compute a ranking of feature importance (a.k.a., feature importance ranks). These feature importance ranks reflect the order in which the studied features contribute to the predictive capability of the studied classifier. These feature importance methods can be divided in two categories: classifier-specific (CS) and classifier-agnostic (CA) methods. The objective is to propose an improvement to the existing study on the importance of feature ranking in terms of defect classifiers..
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
6/23/2022
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
0
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...