Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM68146
Volume:
10 |
10 |
Oct 2026
Pages:
1-9
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Bachelor of Business Administration
KL University
Bachelor of Business Administration
KL University
With the help of chatbots, recommendations, fraud alerts, and automated processing, AI has seeped into the front office of Indian private banks, providing real-time customer support and customer service.AI has transcended into the front office of Indian private banks with chatbots, personalized recommendations, and real-time fraud detection and automated processing, ensuring swift customer support and customer service. The purpose of this study is to explore the impact of these AI-driven services on customer experience. The questionnaire assessed the overall customer experience using a five-point Likert scale and customer perceptions of four AI service dimensions (chatbots and virtual assistants, personalization, fraud detection and security, and process automation and speed) likewise. Data of 300 customers of four different private sector banks were analyzed through Cronbach's alpha, chi-square test of independence, one way ANOVA and multiple linear regression in MS-Excel. There was a significant association between age group and level of use of AI service, according to the chi-square test (χ² (6) = 49.41, p < 0.001, Cramér’s V = 0.29). The results of the One-way ANOVA indicated that there were significant differences among the low, moderate and high level of AI usage groups in customer experience (F (2, 297) = 42.16, p < 0.001, η² = 0.22). The regression model was significant and explained about 33% of the variance in customer experience (R² = 0.333, F (4, 295) = 36.83, p < 0.001); fraud detection and security (β = 0.38) and chatbots (β = 0.34) were the strongest predictors, followed by personalization (β = 0.19) and process automation (β = 0.15). The results indicate that banks need to emphasize security assurance and the quality of their conversation services and promote the use of AI in their interactions with their older customers.
KEYWORDS
AI-enabled services are significantly associated with better customer experience in private sector banks. Usage differs by age, experience improves as usage rises, and security assurance, chatbots and personalization are the strongest drivers. Banks that combine visible security, reliable conversational service and inclusive adoption strategies are best placed to convert AI investment into customer satisfaction and loyalty.
1.Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. 2.Cronbach, L. J. (1951). Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika, 16(3), 297-334. 3.Davis, F. D. (1989). Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340. 4.Dwivedi, Y. K., et al. (2021). Artificial Intelligence (AI): Multidisciplinary perspectives on emerging challenges, opportunities, and agenda for research, practice and policy. International Journal of Information Management, 57, 101994. 5.Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage. 6.Huang, M.-H., & Rust, R. T. (2018). Artificial intelligence in service. Journal of Service Research, 21(2), 155-172. 7.Krejcie, R. V., & Morgan, D. W. (1970). Determining sample size for research activities. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 30(3), 607-610. 8.Lemon, K. N., & Verhoef, P. C. (2016). Understanding customer experience throughout the customer journey. Journal of Marketing, 80(6), 69-96. 9.Nunnally, J. C. (1978). Psychometric theory (2nd ed.). McGraw-Hill. 10.Oliver, R. L. (1980). A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions. Journal of Marketing Research, 17(4), 460-469.
Publication Date
10/20/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
5
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...