Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM67339
Volume:
10 |
9 |
Sep 2026
Pages:
1-17
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
School of Sciences (BCA)
KK Modi University Durg
School of Sciences (BCA)
KK Modi University Durg
Abstract—Artificial Intelligence (AI) has moved from a specialized research area to a technology embedded in everyday digital, domestic, educational, commercial, healthcare, and workplace activities. This review synthesizes evidence from nineteen uploaded research papers covering daily-life applications, social impacts, education, healthcare, transportation, finance, security, automation, and human–AI interaction. The reviewed literature consistently describes AI as a data-driven technology that can automate routine tasks, personalize services, support decisions, improve accessibility, and process information at a scale that is difficult to achieve manually. At the same time, the literature identifies recurring concerns involving privacy, algorithmic bias, cybersecurity, workforce disruption, dependence on automated systems, reduced human interaction, and the need for transparency and human oversight. The sources include narrative reviews, qualitative studies, quantitative survey research, a curriculum-oriented societal resource, a medical-education systematic review, and a public-health education review. The synthesis indicates that the practical impact of AI is domain-dependent: consumer applications such as recommendation systems and virtual assistants are widely integrated, while high-stakes applications such as healthcare and autonomous mobility require stronger validation and governance. The paper proposes a human-centered integration framework in which data quality, model capability, user literacy, domain safeguards, and continuous oversight operate together. The review also identifies research gaps, particularly the need for longitudinal user studies, cross-cultural evidence, measurable evaluation of human–AI collaboration, and stronger analysis of equity and accessibility.
KEYWORDS
intelligence and related applications to examine how AI affects daily life. Across the literature, AI appears in communication, smart homes, healthcare, education, transportation, finance, entertainment, workplaces, agriculture, environmental applications, governance, and cybersecurity. The technologies most frequently discussed include machine learning, deep learning, natural language processing, computer vision, robotics, expert systems, and intelligent control [2], [4], [7], [11], [14]. The reviewed evidence consistently identifies efficiency, convenience, personalization, accessibility, and decision support as major benefits. At the same time, privacy, bias, cybersecurity, job and task disruption, dependence, reduced human interaction, misinformation, and technical reliability recur as significant concerns [5], [7], [10], [16], [17], [19]. High-stakes domains require more than technical accuracy. Healthcare and education sources emphasize validation, human oversight, ethical training, privacy, and institutional readiness [17], [18], [19]. Workplace research highlights the importance of reskilling and adaptation [5], [8]. Social-psychology research shows that AI also changes patterns of interaction and dependence [10]. The paper proposes that responsible everyday AI should follow a human-centered cycle connecting data quality, model capability, human interaction, domain-specific safeguards, and continuous monitoring. This approach does not assume that all AI applications have identical consequences. Instead, it recognizes that risk and benefit depend on context. The main limitation is that the study is a secondary synthesis of the supplied literature and does not introduce new primary data. The sources also differ in methodology, geography, publication type, and scope. Some are review articles, one is explicitly identified as a non-peer-reviewed preprint, and one is a curriculum-oriented resource [6], [16]. Therefore, the paper should be read as an organized synthesis rather than a new empirical measurement of AI adoption. Future work should include longitudinal and cross-cultural studies, standardized measures of human–AI collaboration, domain-specific safety evaluation, accessibility research, and stronger empirical assessment of privacy, fairness, employment transitions, and AI literacy.
[1] Y. Du, “The impact of artificial intelligence on people's daily life,” The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology, vol. 6, no. 6, pp. 12–18, 2024, doi: 10.25236/FSST.2024.060603. [2] S. V, “A study on impact of artificial intelligence on everyday life,” International Journal for Research Trends and Innovation, vol. 8, no. 5, pp. 992–994, 2023. [3] M. Abbas and G. Rasool, “Artificial intelligence in our daily life,” International Journal of Advanced Research in Science, Communication and Technology, vol. 7, no. 1, 2021, doi: 10.48175/568. [4] O. Kofi and O. Allen, “The rise of AI in everyday life: How artificial intelligence is transforming daily tasks,” International Journal of Progressive Research in Engineering Management and Science, vol. 4, no. 6, pp. 2368–2372, 2024. [5] S. Mahajan, “Artificial intelligence and its impacts on the society,” Contemporary Social Sciences, vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 136–149, 2023. [6] O. Pasichnyk and B. Dujkovic-Blagojevic, “Impact of the artificial intelligence on society: Curriculum for primary school children,” European Wergeland Centre and IRIM, AI in STEM Education project. [7] A. Yadav, P. Rai, Satyender, and S. Sofia, “Artificial intelligence in everyday life: A comprehensive review of recent developments and future prospects,” Annals of the Bhandarkar Oriental Research Institute, vol. CI, no. 10, pp. 143–153, 2024. [8] M. A. Islam, S. R. Ithmam, and M. T. Islam, “The impact of artificial intelligence on daily life and the workplace: A qualitative statistical survey in Bangladesh,” International Journal of Science and Business, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 140–151, 2023, doi: 10.58970/IJSB.2239. [9] T. Solanki and S. Doifode, “Usefulness of AI in day-to-day life,” Electronic International Interdisciplinary Research Journal, vol. XII, issue IV, 2023. [10] Z. Lyu and X. Wang, “The impact of artificial intelligence technology on individual behavior from the perspective of social psychology,” International Journal of Frontiers in Sociology, vol. 5, issue 15, pp. 13–18, 2023, doi: 10.25236/IJFS.2023.051503.
Publication Date
9/17/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
4
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...