Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM67855
Volume:
10 |
10 |
Oct 2026
Pages:
1-14
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Bachelor of Business Administration
KLEF
Bachelor of Business Administration
KLEF
Purpose: This paper explores how behavioural biases (herding, overconfidence, loss aversion, mental accounting and fear of missing out), digital media exposure (social media usage, finfluencer influence and digital investment platforms) and financial literacy jointly influence the investment decisions of Generation Z investors in India, and tests whether financial literacy moderates the bias–decision relationship. Design/methodology: Primary data were collected using a five-point Likert-scale structured questionnaire administered online between 12 and 25 September 2026. After removing 72 exact duplicate submissions from the raw export of results, 24 unique respondents remained. The data were analysed in Microsoft Excel, using reliability analysis, chi-square tests, one-way ANOVA and multiple linear regression, including an interaction model; and in Python, using the same statistical tests. Findings: Behavioural biases were the only significant predictor of investment decisions in the joint model (β = 0.82, p = 0.002); the joint model explained 50.5% of the variance (F = 6.79, p = 0.002). Digital media exposure did not significantly predict decisions on its own (R² = 0.194, p = 0.219), and financial literacy neither had a significant direct effect nor significantly moderated the effect of biases. None of the demographic factors was significantly associated with investment decisions in chi-square tests, and the only significant ANOVA result (occupation) was due to a two-person group. Implications: The results are exploratory due to the small sample, but they suggest that interventions should focus on behavioural awareness rather than on product knowledge. Originality: The analysis brings together behavioural, digital and literacy-related explanations in a single framework for India’s Generation Z.
KEYWORDS
This study examined how behavioural biases, digital media exposure and financial literacy are related to the investment decisions of Generation Z investors in India, using 24 unique survey responses. Behavioural biases emerged as the main correlate of investment decisions: the joint model explained 50.5% of the variance and only biases were significant within it, with herding the one bias that stood out individually. Digital media exposure and financial literacy were not significant predictors when their effects were tested, and literacy did not significantly moderate the influence of biases. Investment decisions did not differ meaningfully by demographic group. Given the small sample, low scale reliability and the failure of an alternative outcome to reproduce the bias effect, the findings should be viewed as preliminary evidence that motivates a larger, better-instrumented study. Overall, the study adds to behavioural finance evidence from an emerging market by treating psychological, digital and knowledge-based influences within one framework for the investors who will shape India’s capital markets over the coming decades.
Aiken, L. S., & West, S. G. (1991). Multiple regression: Testing and interpreting interactions. Sage Publications. Banerjee, A. V. (1992). A simple model of herd behavior. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107(3), 797–817. Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2000). Trading is hazardous to your wealth: The common stock investment performance of individual investors. The Journal of Finance, 55(2), 773–806. Barber, B. M., & Odean, T. (2001). Boys will be boys: Gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 116(1), 261–292. Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173–1182. Bikhchandani, S., & Sharma, S. (2001). Herd behavior in financial markets. IMF Staff Papers, 47(3), 279–310. Chen, G., Kim, K. A., Nofsinger, J. R., & Rui, O. M. (2007). Trading performance, disposition effect, overconfidence, representativeness bias, and experience of emerging market investors. Journal of Behavioral Decision Making, 20(4), 425–451. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Fisher, R. A. (1925). Statistical methods for research workers. Oliver and Boyd. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. E. (2019). Multivariate data analysis (8th ed.). Cengage Learning. Kahneman, D., & Tversky, A. (1979). Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk. Econometrica, 47(2), 263–291.
Publication Date
10/12/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
10
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...