Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM62462
Volume:
10 |
5 |
May 2026
Pages:
1-7
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Human Resource
Amity University
Human Resource
Amity University
The manufacturing industry in India is quietly going through a pretty big transformation in how it handles people—especially in finding and bringing in new talent. This paper is my attempt to understand what happens when old-school hiring meets the digital world. I’ve pulled together existing research, industry reports, and case studies to see how e-recruitment is really affecting hiring efficiency in manufacturing. The heart of the paper digs into how things like job portals, online assessments, and digital platforms are changing the rhythm of recruitment on factory floors and in plant offices. By looking at what other researchers have found, and adding a few of my own observations from the steel manufacturing sector, a picture emerges: e-recruitment can genuinely slash the time and money spent on hiring while bringing in better candidates. That said, it’s not a magic wand. Manufacturing faces a distinct challenge—how do you reliably judge a person’s technical skills and safety mindset through a screen? The paper rounds off with some down-to-earth suggestions for manufacturers trying to make e-recruitment work without losing the very human judgment that technical and blue-collar roles still absolutely need.
KEYWORDS
So where does this all land? E-recruitment is genuinely helping manufacturing companies hire better, faster, and more affordably. That much is clear. The timelines shrink. The costs come down. The pool of candidates widens. But these wins come with fine print. Manufacturing is its own unique beast—with its spread of roles, its insistence on real skills, its safety-first mindset, and a digital divide that can't be ignored. That demands subtlety, not a blunt instrument. A purely digital hiring process just doesn't cut it. The smart play is a hybrid one: let the technology do what it's good at—sourcing, filtering, organizing—and then let humans do what we're good at—judging character, sensing fit, seeing a person whole. That balance is the sweet spot. What I saw at JSW Coated Steels drove this home for me. Naukri.com was the engine. A disciplined phone screen thinned the herd. But when it came down to the final call, a department head still sat across from the candidate, in person, and made a human judgment. The technology made the whole thing faster. But good people, applying good sense, made the actual decision. For anyone doing HR in this sector, the message feels clear. Say yes to e-recruitment. Let it make your life easier. But don't abandon the basics of solid assessment. Invest in your tech. Invest just as much in your people. Watch your numbers, but trust your instincts too. And never forget that every application on your screen represents a real person—someone whose skill, whose relationship with safety, and whose fit with your culture will shape not just their own future, but your organization's. Manufacturing is moving, steadily, into a more digital world. HR is moving with it. E-recruitment is quietly becoming the floor beneath everything, not just an extra tool on the shelf. The companies that will do this well in the long run will be the ones that use all this digital power wisely—not to sideline human judgment, but to give it more room to do its best work.
These are the voices I spent time with while writing this paper. Some are academic, some practical, and one is just a company that let me hang around and watch how things really work when nobody's trying to impress a visitor. 1. Kapse, Avinash S. (April 2012). E-Recruitment: A Revolutionary Approach to Recruitment. I found this one early on, and it stuck with me. Back in 2012, Kapse was already calling this a revolution, not just a fad. Reading it made me feel like I was catching a wave that had started long before I ever thought about HR. 2. Hada, Dr. Bhupendra Singh. (2015). E-Recruitment: A Trend in Digital India. This paper brought the whole conversation home. Not America. Not Europe. India. It was the first time I felt like I was reading something that genuinely understood the streets and screens I know. 3. Doherty, R. (October 2010). Getting Social with Recruitment. A short article, but it planted a seed in my head. Recruitment isn't just databases and job posts anymore. It's conversations. It's social. Doherty saw that coming before most. 4. Fisher, Elaine, et al. (September 2021). Strategies to Improve Recruitment and Selection in Clinical Research. Honestly, I almost skipped this one because it's about clinical research, not manufacturing. But I'm glad I didn't. It had a clear, almost surgical way of laying out recruitment strategy, and I ended up borrowing some of that structure in my own thinking. 5. Gamage, A.S. (2014). Recruitment and Selection Practices in Manufacturing Sector. Finally, someone talking directly about factories. Not IT parks. Not corporate towers. This paper felt like finding a missing piece. I kept coming back to it. 6. Korsten, A.D. (2003). Developing a Talent Management Framework for Manufacturing. Old, yes. But sometimes old sources give you the roots of a conversation. This one helped me understand what the manufacturing HR world looked like before the internet crashed into it. 7. Potocnik, Kristina. (29 March 2021). Meta-Analysis of Recruitment and Selection Research. A big, sweeping look at everything we think we know about hiring. It humbled me. It also helped me separate what's actually backed by evidence from what people just keep repeating because it sounds good. 8. Hamza, Pshdar Abdalla. (2021). Recruitment Process in Telecommunication Companies. Different industry, same headaches. Reading about telecom hiring made me notice the things that are unique to manufacturing and the things that are just universally human about finding good people. 9. Rynes, Sara L., PhD. (2003). Recruitment Research Over the Last Decade. A legend in the field. Rynes compressed years and years of studies into something I could actually digest. Her name showed up in half the papers I read, and now I understand why. 10. Shafique, O. (2012). Strategic Recruitment in the Digital Age. This one reframed something for me. Recruitment isn't just about filling a seat that's empty right now. It's about being planed ahead. That word—strategic—has stayed with me. 11. Shah, S. (May-June 2022). Human Resource Planning and Recruitment. A recent voice that reminded me hiring doesn't happen in isolation. It's connected to everything else an organization does, or should be doing, about its people. 12. Kundu, Subhash C., Rattan, Desh, and Sheera, Ved Pal. Systematic Literature Review of Recruitment and Selection in Corporate Sector. A thorough, methodical sweep of the landscape. It gave me a map when I was starting to feel lost in all the different studies and opinions. 13. Chakravarthy, C.S. Gowtham. (2018). Recruitment and Selection as Organizational Assets. I loved the framing here. Hiring isn't an expense to minimize. It's an asset. An investment. That shift in perspective has quietly changed how I think about the whole function. 14. Price, Alan. (2007). Human Resource Management in a Business Context. My grounding book. A bit dusty now, maybe, but it reminded me that a lot of the HR fundamentals—respect, fairness, good judgment—don't change just because the tools do. 15. JSW Steel. Company Profile and HR Practices. (Internal Portal Access) This wasn't something I read in a library. This was just me, sitting in a corner of an office in Vasind, near Mumbai, for 45 days. Watching. Listening. Absorbing. Some of the truest things in this paper didn't come from any journal. They came from observing real people trying their best to hire other real people, day after day.
Publication Date
5/4/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
1
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
8
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...