Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM21032
Volume:
7 |
5 |
May 2023
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Rice Husk Ash (RHA) and Cow Dung Ash (CDA) are agriculturally based pozzolanic materials, these materials are available in huge quantities. This final year project report highlights and presents the results of the study on the use of Cow Dung Ash and Rice Husk Ash as partial replacement of cement in concrete. The experiments were conducted to study the impacts of adding Cow Dung Ash and Rice Husk Ash in several percentages by weight (0%, 5%, 10%, 15%, and 20%) of cement and cure for periods of 28 days before testing for compression strength. The consistency, workability, sieve analysis of aggregates were also tested in this research study. The Compressive test results are 37.75 N/mm2, 31.25 N/mm2, 31.25N/mm2 and 25.25 N/mm2 for 0%, 5%, 10% and 15% replacement of cement with Cow Dung Ash and Rice Husk Ash respectively at 28days. The Workability results gives 45mm, 49mm, 56mm, 68mm and 75mm respectively for 0%,5%, 10%, 15%, and 20% replacement of cement with Cow Dung Ash and Rice Husk Ash. The consistency test results are 0.29, 0.32, 0.36, 0.41 and 0.43 for 0%, 5%, 10%, 15% and 20% replacement of cement with Cow Dung Ash and Rice Husk Ash respectively. The bulk density results are 2452.53 kg/m3, 2370.8 kg/m3, 2380.0 kg/m3 and 2348.5 kg/m3 for 0%, 5%, 10% and 15% replacement of cement with Cow Dung Ash and Rice Husk Ash respectively. The main highlights, it should be highlighted that the more quantity of water is required to standard consistency as the percentages of Cow Dung Ash and Rice Husk Ash are added. Dung Ash and Rice Husk Ash concrete is recommended for use when a ten percentage (10%) of Cow Dung Ash and rice husk ash are not exceeded.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
5/27/2023
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
4
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...