Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM67505
Volume:
10 |
9 |
Sep 2026
Pages:
1-4
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
Department Of Civil Engineering
Dr.J.J. Magdum College of Engineering, Jaysingpur, Maharashtra, India.
Department Of Civil Engineering
D.J.J. Magdum College of Engineering, Jaysingpur, Maharashtra, India.
Department Of Civil Engineering
D.J.J. Magdum College of Engineering, Jaysingpur, Maharashtra, India.
Department Of Civil Engineering
D.J.J. Magdum College of Engineering, Jaysingpur, Maharashtra, India.
Labour productivity is a critical determinant of cost, time, and overall performance in building construction projects. Despite its importance, productivity remains influenced by multiple interrelated factors, including workforce skills and motivation, absenteeism, fatigue, material and equipment availability, site conditions, supervision, and management practices. This review systematically synthesizes findings from existing research studies, review articles, and case studies to identify the key determinants of construction labour productivity and examine effective improvement strategies. The reviewed literature indicates that workforce competency, resource planning, effective supervision, timely material availability, safety management, communication, and technological integration are significant contributors to productivity improvement. The review further highlights gaps in existing research, particularly regarding the integrated assessment of human, managerial, and technological factors. The findings provide a research-based perspective for developing effective productivity improvement strategies and support construction professionals in reducing delays, controlling costs, and enhancing project performance.
KEYWORDS
The future outcome of this study is expected to provide a more systematic and measurable understanding of labour productivity in building construction projects. By using statistical techniques such as correlation, regression analysis, and hypothesis testing, future research can determine the actual influence of individual productivity factors on project time, cost, quality, and overall performance. The study can also help construction managers identify critical factors such as worker skills, absenteeism, fatigue, supervision, material availability, equipment efficiency, safety, and communication that require greater attention. The integration of modern technologies such as Artificial Intelligence, Internet of Things, Building Information Modelling, automation, and digital project management tools may further improve productivity monitoring and decision-making. Future studies can develop productivity prediction models and practical performance indicators that can be applied directly at construction sites. Comparative studies across residential, commercial, and infrastructure projects may also provide a broader understanding of how productivity varies according to project conditions. In addition, greater emphasis on worker training, welfare, safety measures, and incentive systems can contribute to improved workforce performance. The findings may also support the development of standardized productivity measurement frameworks that can be used by construction organizations to regularly assess and improve workforce performance. Real-time monitoring of productivity using digital technologies can help managers identify performance gaps at an early stage and take appropriate corrective actions. Furthermore, the study may contribute to better workforce planning by helping organizations allocate skilled labour, materials, equipment, and other resources more efficiently. The collected data can also serve as a valuable reference for future researchers and construction professionals in developing industry-specific productivity benchmarks. Overall, the expected outcomes include reduced construction delays, better resource utilization, improved cost and time control, enhanced work quality, and more effective management of construction projects.
1. Thomas, A. V., & Sudhakumar, J. (2013). Critical analysis of the key factors affecting construction labour productivity—An Indian perspective. International Journal of Construction Management, 13(4), 103–125. 2. Gupta, V., & Kansal, R. (2014). Improvement of construction labour productivity in Chambal Region. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, 3(10), 34–37. 3. Jarkas, A. M., & Bitar, C. G. (2012). Factors affecting construction labour productivity in Kuwait. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 138(7), 811–820. 4. Jang, H., Kim, K., Kim, J., & Kim, J. (2011). Labour productivity model for reinforced concrete construction projects. Construction Innovation, 11(1), 92–113. 5. El-Gohary, K. M., & Aziz, R. F. (2014). Factors influencing construction labour productivity in Egypt. Journal of Management in Engineering, 30(1), 1–9. 6. Mahamid, I. (2013). Contractors perspective toward factors affecting labour productivity in building construction. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 20(5), 446–460. 7. Jarkas, A. M. (2015). Factors influencing labour productivity in Bahrain’s construction industry. International Journal of Construction Management, 15(1), 94–108. 8. Durdyev, S., & Mbachu, J. (2018). Key constraints to labour productivity in residential building projects: Evidence from Cambodia. International Journal of Construction Management, 18(5), 385–393. 9. Gunduz, M., & Abu-Hijleh, A. (2020). Assessment of human productivity drivers for construction labor through importance rating and risk mapping. Sustainability, 12(20), 8614. 10. Hamza, M., Shahid, S., Bin Hainin, M. R., & Nashwan, M. S. (2022). Construction labour productivity: Review of factors influencing productivity and improvement strategies. International Journal of Construction Management, 22, 413–425.
Publication Date
9/26/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...