Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM21138
Volume:
7 |
5 |
May 2023
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
The New Drugs and Clinical Trials Rules, 2019 (NDCTR) marked a major shift in India’s regulatory framework for approving new drugs, conducting clinical trials, and monitoring drug safety. Before NDCTR, the country’s system — primarily governed by Schedule Y of the Drugs and Cosmetics Rules — faced criticism for its lack of clear timelines, insufficient guidance on advanced therapies, and weak oversight of ethics committees. NDCTR introduced structured approval timelines, expanded definitions to cover biologics, cell and gene therapies, enhanced participant safeguards, and established mandatory ethics committee registration. The adoption of the Central Drugs Standard Control Organization’s (CDSCO) SUGAM portal further streamlined submissions, tracking, and communications, significantly reducing administrative delays. This review discusses NDCTR’s historical background, key features, and its effects on clinical trials and pharmaceutical R&D, with real-world examples including the accelerated approval of Itolizumab during COVID-19, the indigenous DNA vaccine ZyCoV-D, and India’s first CAR-T therapy NexCAR19. Ethical and regulatory implications are analysed alongside criticisms — such as over-reliance on foreign data and variability in ethics committee capacity. Finally, the paper explores opportunities to strengthen India’s position as a global hub for cost-effective, high-quality clinical research.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
8/24/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
3
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...