Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM17058

Influence of Faculty Competence and Teaching Methods on Student Outcomes in Management Education

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM17058

Volume:

6 |

12 |

Dec 2022

Pages:

1-7

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM17058

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

DPVR

Dr. P. Venkateswara Rao

MBA

CMR Technical Campus , Medchal

Download Author Certificate
GSK

G Suresh Kumar

MBA

CMR Technical Campus , Medchal

DPRS

Dr. P. Rama Seshayya

MBA

CMR Technical Campus , Medchal

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

This article examines the multidimensional relationship between faculty competence, pedagogical approaches, and student learning outcomes in management education. Drawing on contemporary research in higher education, business schools, and MBA programs, this review synthesizes evidence on how instructor quality, teaching style, and innovative methodologies shape academic performance, student satisfaction, and the development of managerial competencies. The findings collectively underscore that faculty competence and teaching methods are central determinants of student success, engagement, and innovation capacity in management education.

KEYWORDS

Competence and Teaching

Cite This Article

Dr. P. Venkateswara Rao, G Suresh Kumar, Dr. P. Rama Seshayya, "Influence of Faculty Competence and Teaching Methods on Student Outcomes in Management Education," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 1-7, Dec 2022. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM17058

Full Article/Conclusion

Faculty competence and teaching methods are not peripheral to management education — they are central to its purpose. The research is clear: instructors who combine subject mastery with relational warmth, active pedagogical strategies, and genuine support for student growth produce measurably better outcomes across academic performance, engagement, satisfaction, and innovative capacity. As management education continues to respond to technological disruption, globalization, and shifting workforce demands, the quality of those who teach will remain the most consequential variable in student success. Business schools that invest in their faculty — both in terms of pedagogical development and supportive institutional cultures — will be best positioned to produce graduates capable of leading organizations through an increasingly complex world.

References

Alvarez-Bell, R. M., Wirtz, D., & Bian, H. (2017). Instructional guidance, self-directed learning, and team-based frameworks in management education. Journal of Management Education, 41(3), 340–368. Barber, M., & Mourshed, M. (2007). How the world’s best-performing school systems come out on top. McKinsey & Company. Bilal, S., et al. (2019). The impact and effectiveness of faculty development program in fostering the faculty’s knowledge, skills, and professional competence: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Journal of Health Sciences, 9(2), 44–56. Canuto, P. P., Choycawen, M., & Pagdawan, R. (2024). The influence of teaching competencies on teachers’ performance and students’ academic achievement in primary science education. ERIC Document. Danielson, C. (2014). The Framework for Teaching evaluation instrument. The Danielson Group. Hanushek, E. A., & Rivkin, S. G. (2010). Generalizations about using value-added measures of teacher quality. American Economic Review, 100(2), 267–271. Kahu, E. R. (2013). Framing student engagement in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 38(5), 758–773. Laasch, O., Moosmayer, D. C., & Antonacopoulou, E. P. (2023). The interdisciplinary responsible management competence framework. Journal of Business Ethics, 187, 733–757. Mayhew, M. J., et al. (2019). Curriculum interventions for innovation and student learning outcomes. Review of Higher Education, 42(1), 1–34. Price, M., et al. (2021). Pedagogical competence and student satisfaction in higher education. Higher Education Research & Development, 40(3), 603–617.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

12/28/2021

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

2

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

31

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...