Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM42014
Volume:
9 |
3 |
Mar 2025
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
The rapid advancement of generative artificial intelligence (AI) has transformed academic learning, providing students with instant access to problem-solving tools. This study examines the impact of generative AI on students’ problem-solving abilities, critical thinking, decision-making, and academic performance across various disciplines. A structured, closed-ended questionnaire was used to collect data from 250 students through Google Forms. The findings indicate that a majority of students perceive AI as beneficial in improving efficiency, aligning with course curricula, and enhancing their confidence in tackling complex problems independently. Additionally, AI tools encourage students to explore alternative solutions rather than solely relying on generated responses. However, concerns remain regarding AI’s effect on critical thinking, as some students may develop a dependency on automated solutions. While many participants critically evaluate AI-generated responses, a significant portion acknowledges reduced engagement in independent analytical reasoning. The study highlights the need for a balanced approach in integrating AI into education, ensuring that students retain essential cognitive skills while leveraging AI’s advantages. Educators and policymakers must develop strategies that encourage critical thinking alongside AI-assisted learning to optimize educational outcomes. By fostering a thoughtful and reflective approach to AI usage, institutions can harness its potential to enhance learning without compromising students’ independent problem-solving capabilities.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
3/2/2025
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
35
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...