Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
IJSREM66800
Volume:
10 |
8 |
Aug 2026
Pages:
1-7
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Elecrical and Electronics Engineering
KLR College Of Engineering and Technology
Elecrical and Electronics Engineering
KLR College Of Engineering and Technology
Elecrical and Electronics Engineering
KLR College Of Engineering and Technology
As the demand for sustainable transportation solutions continues to grow, the demand for battery electric vehicles (BEVs) has soared. Worries about reliability of the system and the limited driving range of EVs, however, are still stopping the EV revolution. Dual-battery systems have garnered much interest as a possible answer to these issues, especially with electric two-wheelers. In this work, two novel reconfigurable converter topologies are proposed which are able to support operation of two batteries. Depending on the requirement, these Converters can be configured in different ways: The batteries can be set in series or parallel, or even one battery can be used alone for charging or propulsion. The converter output can be directly connected to the charging unit or the traction drive system. In order to keep circulation currents to a minimum while using parallel batteries, it is crucial to keep the terminal voltages almost similar. Hence, in order to keep the battery potentials balanced, the suggested topologies have a built-in voltage equalization mechanism. Two batteries can be charged simultaneously as tested by embedding the converter in a non-isolated inverter charger design. System transfer functions are built by using state-space averaging methods and small-signal analysis, the K-factor approach is used to generate controller settings. Extensive calculations (in MATLAB) and experimental prototype results have been used to validate the suggested converter designs regarding their practicality and performance.
KEYWORDS
For use in electric vehicles that use two batteries, this research introduced and examined in detail two novel reconfigurable power converter topologies: the Contactor-Based Converter (CBC) and the Bidirectional Switch-Based Converter (BSC). The suggested dual-battery design's charging capabilities were tested by including a non-isolated Inverter-Charger System (ICS) into the system architecture. Comprehensive MATLAB simulations and experimental hardware implementation were used to test the reconfiguration features of the converters that were suggested. These functions include single battery operation, battery series, battery parallel in charging and traction conditions. The obtained results indicate that the proposed converter topologies enhance the utilization of the batteries and offer greater flexibility in operations due to the battery load sharing among the battery packs. The capacity to choose link either battery pack to the output terminals is a major strength of the suggested system that improves system dependability, fault tolerance, and battery design adaptability. Besides, the suggested converters before the parallel operation provide a voltage-balancing function, which can balance the battery voltages at the battery pack terminals. This allows the batteries to last longer and operate more reliably by minimizing the amount of current flowing between the packs of batteries, which in turn reduces the stress on the batteries. Both simulation studies and hardware validation have been performed and the suggested converter designs are effective, resilient and can be adapted to a wide range of operating conditions. One of the biggest challenges that lie in the path of EVs is their limited range, lack of dependability, and operating flexibility. The proposed dual-battery integration technique is feasible and effective in the solution. Further benefits of the reconfigurable topology are improved functional safety, enhanced system resilience, extended battery life and uninterrupted operation in case of partial battery failure. Despite the slightly higher hardware cost initially introduced by the proposed architecture, it provides a cost-effective and attractive solution for future applications of electric vehicles because of its high reliability, low maintenance, better battery performance and continuity.
[1] I. E. A. Report, “Co2 emissions in 2022–analysis,” 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.iea.org/reports/co2-emissions-in-2022 [2] H. L.Maclean, A.Milovanoff, and I. D. Posen, “The electric vehicle is not enough: To decarbonize road transport we need to complement EVs with bikes, rail, city planning, and alternative energy,” IEEE Spectr., vol. 59, no. 11, pp. 28–33, Nov. 2022. [3] A. Ahmad, Z. A. Khan, M. Saad Alam, and S. Khateeb, “A review of the electric vehicle charging techniques, standards, progression and evolution of ev technologies in Germany,” Smart Sci., vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 36–53, 2018. [4] S. Lu, K. A. Corzine, and M. Ferdowsi, “A new battery/ultracapacitor energy storage system design and its motor drive integration for hybrid electric vehicles,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 56, no. 4, pp. 1516–1523, Jul. 2007. [5] K. Alobeidli and V. Khadkikar, “A new ultracapacitor state of charge control concept to enhance battery lifespan of dual storage electric vehicles,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 67, no. 11, pp. 10470–10481, Nov. 2018. [6] N. Herath, P. Binduhewa, L. Samaranayake, J. Ekanayake, and S. Longo, “Design of a dual energy storage power converter for a small electric vehicle,” in Proc. 2017 IEEE Int. Conf. Ind. Inf. Syst., 2017, pp. 1–6. [7] J. M. Blanes, R. Gutiérrez, A. Garrigós, J. L. Lizán, and J. M. Cuadrado, “Electric vehicle battery life extension using ultracapacitors and an FPGA controlled interleaved buck–boost converter,” IEEE Trans. Power Electron., vol. 28, no. 12, pp. 5940–5948, Dec. 2013. [8] C. -M. Lai, J. Teh, Y. -C. Lin, and Y. Liu, “Study of a bidirectional power converter integrated with battery/ultracapacitor dual-energy storage,” Energies, vol. 13, no. 5, 2020, Art. no. 1234. [Online]. Available: https://www.mdpi.com/1996-1073/13/5/1234 [9] J. P. F. Trovão, M. -A. Roux, É. Ménard, and M. R. Dubois, “Energy- and power-split management of dual energy storage system for a three-wheel electric vehicle,” IEEE Trans. Veh. Technol., vol. 66, no. 7, pp. 5540–5550, Jul. 2017. [10] J. P. Trovão and C. H. Antunes, “A comparative analysis of metaheuristic methods for power management of a dual energy storage system for electric vehicles,” Energy Convers. Manage., vol. 95, pp. 281–296, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/ pii/S0196890415001430
Publication Date
8/17/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
2
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...