Loading article...
Loading article...
Stream/Area:
-
Subject:
-
Paper ID:
10.55041/IJSREM57304
Volume:
10 |
3 |
Mar 2026
Pages:
Publication Frequency:
Monthly (12 issues per year)
License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.
The increasing deployment of complex machine learning models in high-stakes domains has intensified the demand for transparent and interpretable decision-making systems. While state-of-the-art predictive models often achieve high accuracy, their black-box nature limits trust, accountability, and regulatory compliance. This paper presents an interactive explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) framework built using ExplainerDashboard, an open-source Python library designed to visualize and interpret machine learning models through web-based dashboards. The proposed approach integrates feature attribution, global and local explanation techniques, and model performance diagnostics into a unified interface. By combining SHAP-based explanations, permutation feature importance, partial dependence plots, and instance-level analyses, the system enables both technical and non-technical stakeholders to explore model behaviour interactively. Experimental evaluation is conducted on benchmark classification datasets to assess interpretability, usability, and computational overhead. Results demonstrate that interactive dashboards significantly improve model transparency without degrading predictive performance, supporting their adoption in real-world decision-support systems.
KEYWORDS
Publication Date
7/2/2026
Peer Review Type
Double-Blind Peer Review
Review Rounds: 2
Documents
Article Views
0
Total views since publication
PDF Downloads
6
Total downloads since publication
Geographic Reach
5
Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.
Plagiarism Screening
This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.
Funding Information
No funding information available for this research.
Related research in the same subject area
Loading similar articles...