Crossref DOIMemberCiteFactoropen accessissn
SJIF Impact Factor 8.659 | ISSN: 2582-3930
IJSREM Logo

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management

(Gateway to Global Scholars - An International, Scholarly, Multi-Disciplinary, Open Access Journal)

Peer-Reviewed Journal Designed to Meet UGC's Quality Parameters

HomeCurrent IssuePast IssuesPay OnlineConferencesEditorial BoardAbout UsContact Us
IJSREM

Loading article...

Follow Us

  • Google Scholar
  • ResearchGate
  • Academia.edu
  • Mendeley
  • LinkedIn
  • Facebook
  • Instagram

Journal Policies

  • Peer Review Policy
  • Publication Ethics
  • Copyright Infringement
  • Refund & Cancellation Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Privacy Policy

Journal Identifiers & Licenses

  • ISSN Verified: 2582-3930ISSN Verified: 2582-3930
  • Crossref DOI: 10.55041Crossref DOI: 10.55041
  • SJIF Ranking: 08.659SJIF Ranking: 08.659
  • Licensed under CC BY 4.0Licensed under CC BY 4.0
  • ISO Certification: 9001:2015ISO Certification: 9001:2015
  • Indexed & Cited In: Google ScholarIndexed & Cited In: Google Scholar

Contact Us

International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management (IJSREM)

#62/1, New No 7, 1st Cross, 2nd Main, Ganganagar, R T Nagar, Bangalore North, Bangalore, Karnataka, India – 560032
[email protected]+91 93911 67991
logos
logos
Working Hours

Mon – Sat: 9:00 AM – 6:00 PM

Sunday: 10:00 AM – 4:00 PM

+91 93911 67991

© 2026 IJSREM – International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management. This is an open-access journal. Articles are published under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

DisclaimerPrivacy PolicyTerms and Conditions
ArticlePeer ReviewedOpen AccessPlagiarism Passed
Paper ID:IJSREM68079

Interest-Rate Risk and Runaway Deposits: Reassessing the March 2023 US Bank Failures

Stream/Area:

-

Subject:

-

Paper ID:

IJSREM68079

Volume:

10 |

10 |

Oct 2026

Pages:

1-7

Publication Frequency:

Monthly (12 issues per year)

DOI
Digital Object Identifier
10.55041/IJSREM68079

License:International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management follows the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) License, allowing free use and distribution with proper attribution.

Share this article:

Authors

DGBG

Dr Guruprasad B G

Management Studies

BGS B-SCHOOL

Download Author Certificate
DNRM

Dr Naveen Raj M

Management Studies

BGS B-SCHOOL

Download Co-Author Certificate

Author Services & Downloads

Full ArticlesAcceptance Certificate

Abstract

The primary cause of the failures was a lack of liquidity for the banks that were unable to meet depositors' withdrawals, as the three banks and First Republic Bank had experienced credit losses in March and May of 2023. In this essay, the question is posed as to why these banks were fragile, and what changes following the crisis most directly tackle the fragility. It says that unrecovered interest-rate losses, stemming from the aggressive monetary tightening of 2022, and the high concentration, digital mobility and lack of insurance for deposits in banks with weak governance and supervision were responsible for the failures. Both conditions were satisfactory in themselves, but combined to create a run that was more rapid than liquidity conditions at the time were thought to be capable of handling. The essay discusses recent scholarship, as well as official reviews conducted by the Federal Reserve, the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, the Financial Stability Board and the Government Accountability Office, and the FDIC's alternative deposit insurance. It notes a general consensus on the importance of uninsured deposits and interest-rate risk; uncertainty over the extent of the vulnerability beyond the failed banks and whether the runs were basic or panic-related; and the absence of causal evidence related to the impact of regulation tailoring. The essay evaluates capital, liquidity, long-term debt, deposit insurance and supervisory reforms against the backdrop of their interaction, and finds that the interaction most directly affects liquidity readiness and deposit insurance design, and that measurement of capital should be included, though in part.

KEYWORDS

bank runs; Silicon Valley Bank; interest-rate risk; uninsured deposits; deposit insurance; liquidity regulation; banking supervision; financial stability

Cite This Article

Dr Guruprasad B G, Dr Naveen Raj M, "Interest-Rate Risk and Runaway Deposits: Reassessing the March 2023 US Bank Failures," International Journal of Scientific Research in Engineering and Management, vol. 10, no. 10, pp. 1-7, Oct 2026. https://doi.org/10.55041/IJSREM68079

Full Article/Conclusion

The failures in March 2023 can be better explained in terms of unfulfilled interest rate losses combined with the lack of runability in the deposit base and their extensive uninsured nature, as well as with regards to poor governance and supervision. The recent literature is unanimous that important risk exposures included uninsured deposits and risk to interest rates, but variable in scope on which banks were affected by the runs, and on whether the runs were fundamentally or panic-driven. If the vulnerability was not caused by one component alone, then “remedies” seem to be more likely to be effective if they improve the readiness of liquidity in addition to making changes to how capital is measured, and if they enhance the powers of supervisors to escalate cases. The predominant need for future research is the collection of causal empirical evidence of how the nature of regulation's tailoring and the nature of deposits affected banks' performance, to adjust regulatory reforms on the basis of a wider range of experience than the one in the current episode.

References

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2023). Report on the 2023 banking turmoil. Bank for International Settlements. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System. (2023). Review of the Federal Reserve's supervision and regulation of Silicon Valley Bank. Cipriani, M., Eisenbach, T. M., & Kovner, A. (2024). Tracing bank runs in real time (Staff Report No. 1104). Federal Reserve Bank of New York. Cookson, J. A., Fox, C., Gil-Bazo, J., Imbet, J. F., & Schiller, C. (2023). Social media as a bank run catalyst. SSRN. Diamond, D. W., & Dybvig, P. H. (1983). Bank runs, deposit insurance, and liquidity. Journal of Political Economy, 91(3), 401–419. Drechsler, I., Savov, A., & Schnabl, P. (2017). The deposits channel of monetary policy. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 132(4), 1819–1876. Drechsler, I., Savov, A., Schnabl, P., & Wang, O. (2023). Banking on uninsured deposits (NBER Working Paper No. 31138). National Bureau of Economic Research. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation. (2023). Options for deposit insurance reform. Financial Stability Board. (2023). 2023 bank failures: Preliminary lessons learnt for resolution. Government Accountability Office. (2023). Bank regulation: Preliminary review of agency actions related to March 2023 bank failures (GAO-23-106736). Jiang, E. X., Matvos, G., Piskorski, T., & Seru, A. (2024). Monetary tightening and U.S. bank fragility in 2023: Mark-to-market losses and uninsured depositor runs? Journal of Financial Economics, 159, Article 103899. Metrick, A. (2024). The failure of Silicon Valley Bank and the panic of 2023. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 38(1), 133–152.

Editorial & Review Transparency

Publication Date

10/17/2026

Peer Review Type

Double-Blind Peer Review

Review Rounds: 2

Documents

Review Report (Confidential)
Copyright Form (Office)

Article Metrics & Impact

Article Views

1

Total views since publication

PDF Downloads

6

Total downloads since publication

Geographic Reach

5

Indexing, Archiving & Preservation

Google Scholar
Academia
ResearchGate
Crossref
SSRN
Semantic Scholar
Thomson Reuters
WorldCat
Mendeley
OpenAlex
EBSCO
Zenodo

Digital Preservation: This article is permanently archived on Zenodo and complies with all data preservation standards across major indexing platforms.

Ethics, Compliance & Transparency

Plagiarism Screening

This manuscript has been checked for plagiarism using TurnitinPlagiarismChecker software.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this research work.

Funding Information

No funding information available for this research.

Similar & Recommended Articles

Similar Articles by Topic

Related research in the same subject area

Loading similar articles...